How an idealistic tree-planting project turned into Kenya’s toxic, thorny nightmare

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"The Impact of Invasive Mathenge Shrub on Livestock and Ecosystems in Northern Kenya"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In the village of Lerata, near Mount Ololokwe in northern Kenya's Samburu County, the introduction of the mesquite shrub, locally known as mathenge, has drastically transformed the landscape and the lives of the pastoralists who inhabit it. John Lmakato, a local herder, recounts how he lost 193 of his cattle after they strayed into a conservation area and were shot. The spread of mathenge, introduced in 1948 as a solution to desertification, has led to significant ecological and economic challenges. Originally planted for its benefits, including preventing soil erosion and providing fodder, mathenge has become one of the world's worst invasive species, covering nearly 2 million hectares in Kenya alone. Its deep-root system extracts moisture from the soil, disrupting local ecosystems and contributing to flooding, and it poses a direct threat to livestock, causing injuries and dental issues that hinder their ability to graze effectively. The invasive plant has also displaced communities and affected watercourses, leading to a dire situation for many pastoralists who rely on their livestock for survival.

Efforts to mitigate the impacts of mathenge focus on its potential utility rather than eradication. Community projects, supported by organizations like Vétérinaires Sans Frontières, are teaching locals how to utilize mathenge pods as livestock feed, thereby reducing the spread of the plant while also providing nutritional benefits to the animals. Additionally, local training has introduced briquette production from mathenge wood, which serves as an alternative fuel source, alleviating pressure on native trees. Despite these initiatives, experts emphasize that more extensive interventions are necessary to control mathenge's growth, as its dense canopy and extensive root system inhibit the growth of native flora and disrupt local biodiversity. The situation remains precarious, as the plant's dominance threatens to alter entire ecosystems and the livelihoods of those who depend on them.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights the unintended consequences of a well-meaning environmental initiative in Kenya, specifically the introduction of the mesquite shrub known as mathenge. Initially viewed as a solution to desertification and land degradation, it has since become an invasive species that disrupts local ecosystems and threatens the livelihoods of pastoral communities. Through personal testimonies and scientific data, the article paints a grim picture of how the project has spiraled into a crisis.

Intent and Public Perception

The purpose behind this coverage appears to be twofold. Firstly, it seeks to raise awareness about the environmental and social impact of invasive species, particularly in the context of Kenya's pastoral communities. Secondly, it aims to critique the oversights in environmental policy that led to the introduction of mathenge. By focusing on personal stories, such as that of John Lmakato, the article aims to evoke empathy and a sense of urgency among readers regarding the plight of those affected.

Hidden Agendas

While the article primarily focuses on the environmental consequences, there may be an underlying critique of governmental and international organizations that promoted the planting of mathenge without fully understanding its long-term effects. The piece could be interpreted as a call for greater caution and responsibility in environmental interventions, suggesting that policymakers may need to reassess their strategies to avoid similar mistakes in the future.

Manipulation and Credibility

The article is grounded in real experiences and scientific research, contributing to its credibility. However, it does carry a certain level of emotional appeal, which could be seen as manipulative to some extent. The use of vivid personal stories serves to capture the reader's attention and may lead them to a more emotional rather than purely rational response. Although the article is factual, its narrative style could influence how the information is perceived.

Comparative Context

When compared to other environmental news reports, this article stands out due to its personal narrative approach, which humanizes the statistics and scientific findings. Similar articles often focus more on data and expert opinions, whereas this piece emphasizes the human impact of environmental policies. Such a narrative can resonate more deeply with the public, potentially leading to a stronger call for action.

Potential Societal Impact

The article has the potential to influence public opinion on environmental policy and land management in Kenya. It may lead to increased scrutiny of governmental decisions regarding land use and conservation strategies. Public awareness could also encourage community-led initiatives aimed at controlling invasive species and protecting local ecosystems.

Community Support

The article likely appeals to environmental activists, local communities affected by invasive species, and policymakers interested in sustainable land management. It underscores the need for collaboration between communities and authorities to address environmental issues effectively.

Market Implications

While the article itself may not have immediate implications for stock markets, it highlights issues that could affect agricultural sectors and land investments in Kenya. Companies involved in environmental management, sustainable agriculture, or invasive species control might find this information relevant for strategic planning and investment.

Global Relevance

On a broader scale, this article contributes to ongoing discussions about biodiversity, invasive species, and environmental sustainability, which are pertinent in today's global context. The challenges highlighted in Kenya reflect issues faced by many countries around the world, making it a relevant case study in international environmental policy debates.

Artificial Intelligence Usage

The article appears to have been written by a human author, as it includes personal narratives and nuanced discussions that are typically beyond the current capabilities of AI. However, if AI were involved, it might have assisted in data collection or initial drafting. Any AI influence would likely be seen in the structuring of information or in generating statistical insights, rather than in the emotive storytelling aspect.

In conclusion, the article serves as a poignant reminder of the complexities involved in environmental interventions. It highlights the need for careful consideration of ecological impacts and the importance of community involvement in policy decisions. The overall reliability of the article is high due to its grounding in real experiences and scientific research, despite an emotional undertone aimed at evoking a response from readers.

Unanalyzed Article Content

For his entire life, John Lmakato has lived in Lerata, a village nestled at the foot of Mount Ololokwe in northern Kenya’s Samburu county. “This used to be a treeless land. Grass covered every inch of the rangelands, and livestock roamed freely,” he says.

Lmakato’s livestock used to roam freely in search of pasture, but three years ago he lost 193 cattle after they wandered into a conservation area in Laikipia – known for the fight over land accessbetween Indigenous pastoralists and commercial ranchers.

“Some of my cows were shot dead,” he says. “People were killed.” Of the 200 cattle Lmakato once owned, only seven remain.

One of the main reasons the livestock of Lmakato, 48, crossed over into the conservation area was themathenge, as the mesquite shrub (Neltuma juliflora,formerly classified asProsopis juliflora)is known in Kenya. The grassland landscape is so dominated by inedible mathenge trees that cattle have to wander further to graze.Introduced in 1948, mathenge – a plant native to South America – became widespread throughout east Africa in the 1970s.

It was seen as a remedy for creeping desertification, providing tree cover and preventing soil erosion in drylands, as well as a source of fuel and animal fodder. In Kenya, the UN Food and Agricultural Organization and the government actively encouraged its planting.

As the shrub spread, it quickly became a nightmare. A closely related species is now considered one of the world’sworst invasive floral species.

Since its introduction, mathenge has spread across the country, and nearly three-quarters of Kenya isat risk of being invaded. It has colonised large swaths of the country’s arid and semi-arid regions, choking vast rangelands and drawing moisture from the soil with its deep roots.

The Kenya Forestry Research Institute (Kefri) estimates it has encroached on2 million hectares(7,700 sq miles).According to Kefri scientists, it is spreading at a rate of up to 15% a year.

In 2006, its harmful effects led to acourt case against the Kenyan government, when people in Baringo – one of the country’s hardest-hit regions – filed a petition seeking compensation for the impact of the introduced mathenge trees. The court ruled against the government.

“The spread is so fast that it has caused entire communities to be displaced, schools to close, and even disrupted river flows, as the plant blocks watercourses – contributing to flooding and displacement,” says Davis Ikiror, Kenya-Somalia country director for Vétérinaires Sans Frontières (VSF) Suisse, an organisation that has worked in Kenya for more than two decades.

In Samburu county, where more than 60% of the population are pastoralists and 30% mix herding with small-scale farming, livestock is a lifeline. Some animalsdie from mathenge toxicityafter ingesting it in large amounts. While grazing, the plant’s tough thorns injure the animals by lodging in their feet and its sweet pods – high in sugar – cause dental decay and the loss of teeth among the animals.

Livestock have become unwitting vectors in mathenge’s dissemination: as animals graze, they eat the pods and deposit the seeds with their dung.

In 2008, Kenya declared mathenge to be a noxious weed and passed laws requiring people to clear invasions of the plant or report them if the infestation was unmanageable.

“There’s no way we’re going to eliminate the plant. That’s why we need to control it,” says Ramadhan Golicha, an environmental officer with the Isiolo county government.

But with resources yet to be allocated for a national action plan on clearing the plant, some projects are exploring the possibility of turning it into raw material. By making mathenge a commodity to be exploited, they hope to keep its spread under control.

Lmakato was among 25 community members taking part in one such project, run by VSF Suisse along with the University of Nairobi and the regional governments of Samburu and Isiolo. “We’ve learned how to use it to our advantage,” he says.

Sign up toGlobal Dispatch

Get a different world view with a roundup of the best news, features and pictures, curated by our global development team

after newsletter promotion

One of the first techniques they adopted was turning mathenge pods into livestock feed by grinding and mixing the seeds with straw, bean husks and acacia pods. “That allows us to produce fodder, which we then store for the entire dry season,” says Martina Lenanyangerra, another community leader involved in the project.

A study of this combination of feed is being carried out nearly 180 miles (300km) away, at the University of Nairobi. In June last year, Edward Musya, a vet and master’s student studying animal nutrition, travelled to Merti – one of the worst-affected areas in the country – to collect more than 20 types of local plants to combine with mathenge.

“The goal is to formulate a feed that is high in nutrients and easily digestible for livestock,” says Musya. “When mixed, the sugar content in the pods decreases, making it a safe feed while also helping to contain the plant’s spread.”

The training in Samburu also introduced briquette production as a fuel source, using barrel-shaped kilns to turn mathenge wood into charcoal. In Samburu – where more than95% of people rely on firewood or charcoal for cooking– this has helped ease pressure on native trees while also offering a new source of income.

But to rein in the plant’s spread, larger interventions will probably be required. Mathenge’s deep root system, reported to go asdown as far as 35 metres below ground, siphons off precious water that other species require.

Its branches grow so thickly and its roots are so deep that an incursion can even alter the course of rivers. In some parts of Isiolo, such as Ires a’Boru, displacement of water beyond the banks caused flooding that forced communities to relocate.

The slowed water flow and dark canopies create ideal breeding grounds for mosquitoes – which worsen the spread ofmalariaandRift Valley fever, and kala-azar, orleishmaniasis, which is carried by sandflies.

The plant’s chokehold has wrought havoc on biodiversity. Once seeded, it forms a dense canopy that stops other plants growing by blocking out light, says Douglas Machuchu, project manager at VSF Suisse.

To protect entire ecosystems, the shrub must be kept in check. “Where mathenge grows properly, nothing grows underneath,” he says.

Find moreage of extinction coverage here, and follow the biodiversity reportersPhoebe WestonandPatrick Greenfieldin the Guardian app for more nature coverage

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian