Hancock defends moving hospital patients to care homes during Covid pandemic

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Hancock defends controversial patient discharge policy during Covid inquiry"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

During a recent public inquiry into the UK's handling of the Covid-19 pandemic, former Health Secretary Matt Hancock defended the controversial decision to discharge untested hospital patients into care homes. He characterized this move as the 'least worst decision' available at the time, made in an effort to free up hospital beds during the early weeks of the pandemic. Despite a subsequent high court ruling deeming the policy illegal, Hancock maintained that there were no viable alternatives that would have saved more lives. He expressed regret over the lack of better options but insisted that keeping patients in hospitals would have led to worse outcomes. Hancock acknowledged the decision was officially a government one but asserted that it was primarily driven by then NHS chief executive Simon Stevens, while also accepting personal responsibility for the consequences of the policy.

Critics, including solicitor Nicola Brook representing bereaved families, condemned Hancock’s remarks as disrespectful to those who lost their lives due to the policy. Brook pointed out that many care homes lacked the capacity to isolate discharged patients and highlighted the fact that Covid-19 is an airborne virus. She called for a review of the decision-making process, noting that the inquiry has not summoned Stevens for questioning. The inquiry revealed that nearly 46,000 care home residents in England and Wales died with Covid-19 during the pandemic's initial phase, with many deaths linked to the rapid discharge policy. Hancock's claim of having created a 'protective ring' around care homes has been met with skepticism, as evidence emerged of significant staffing shortages and a lack of proper isolation measures during the critical period. The inquiry continues to investigate the care sector's response to the pandemic, with further testimonies expected in the coming weeks.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Discharging untested patients from hospitals to care homes during the Covid pandemic was the “least worst decision”, the former health secretaryMatt Hancockhas told a public inquiry.

In his testimony to theUK Covid-19 inquiryon Wednesday, Hancock defended the decision – which was laterruled illegal in a high court judgment– to move hospital patients into care homes during the early weeks of the pandemic to free up space.

“Nobody has yet provided me with an alternative that was available at the time that would have saved more lives,” he said. “I still can’t see a decision that would have been less bad. None of the options were good. It was the least worst decision that could have been taken at the time. While I wish there had been a better option, I still can’t find one.

“The likelihood of things being worse if people had stayed in hospital was very high.”

Nicola Brook, a solicitor representing more than 7,000 people from Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice UK, said Hancock’s words were “an insult to the memory of each and every person who died”.

“He knew at the time that many care homes did not have the ability to isolate the people who would be discharged from hospital and that Covid was airborne,” she said. “It’s frankly ridiculous and insulting that he says they tried to throw a protective ring around care homes when his department’s policies caused Covid to spread like wildfire amongst society’s most vulnerable loved ones.”

Hancock said the discharge policy was “formally a government decision” but that it was “driven” by the thenNHSchief executive Simon Stevens. He also said that while he had not taken the decision himself, he took responsibility for it.

Brook said: “Mr Hancock claims the decision to discharge people into care homes was driven by Simon Stevens, the chief executive of the NHS, yet the inquiry is not calling him. We call for this decision to be urgently reviewed.”

Hancock was giving evidence as part of the sixth module of the inquiry, focusing specifically on the care sector.

Earlier this week, it was heard that a senior civil servant said there had been a “generational slaughter within care homes” in written evidence to the inquiry.

Almost 46,000 care home residents died with Covid in England and Wales between March 2020 and January 2022, many of them in theearly weeks of the pandemic.

The decision to rapidly discharge hospital patients to care homes in order to free up beds, when testing and isolation facilities were not yet widely available, has been strongly criticised for causing rapid spread of the disease in care homes.

In 2022, the high court said the policy not to isolate discharged hospital patients in the first weeks of the pandemic without testing was “irrational”.

On Tuesdaya care home owner and manager giving evidencesaid she had refused to allow untested hospital patients into her nursing home, and was told she would be reported to the care inspectorate for bed blocking.

Hancock said that isolation of discharged patients had not been clinically recommended at the time, but “in hindsight” it should have been.

When questioned about whether there had been enough staff to care for the discharged patients, amid evidence of a widespread shortage of carers, Hancock said: “We knew that people would do what they needed to do.”

He has also been heavily criticised for his claims that a “protective ring” had been placed around care homes, previously admitting to the inquiry that it was not an “unbroken circle”.

The care sector module of the inquiry is expected to run until the end of July.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian