Guardian Essential poll: Labor leads Coalition in final pre-election poll as Dutton’s approval rating slips further

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Labor Maintains Lead Over Coalition in Final Poll Before Election"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The latest Guardian Essential poll indicates that Anthony Albanese is leading the Coalition ahead of the upcoming election, with Labor securing a 52% to 48% advantage on a two-party basis. Albanese's approval rating has shown a modest increase since the last poll, while Peter Dutton’s approval has declined for the fourth consecutive poll, suggesting a shift in public sentiment as the campaign progresses. Notably, a significant portion of voters, approximately two-thirds, report that their voting intentions are based on which party they believe will improve their situation over the next three years, rather than reflecting on their circumstances from the past three years. This perspective may be influencing the growing support for Labor, as the campaign's dynamics evolve, with 32% of voters indicating a preference for Labor compared to 34% for the Coalition and 13% for the Greens. The poll surveyed 2,163 voters and also noted that One Nation garnered 10% of first preference votes.

In examining voter demographics, the Essential poll reveals that Labor is favored by both men and women, with leads of 51% to 49% among men and 54% to 46% among women. Additionally, Labor leads significantly among younger voters aged 18-34, with 58% supporting them compared to 42% for the Coalition, while the Coalition maintains a lead among those over 55 years of age. Despite a slight improvement in Albanese’s approval ratings, he still holds a net disapproval rating of minus-3%. In contrast, Dutton’s ratings have deteriorated to a net of minus-12%, marking a significant decline since December 2024. The poll results reflect broader trends observed in other surveys, although the Coalition has disputed their alignment with internal research. As the election approaches, the key question remains whether voters will prioritize their past experiences under the Labor government or their expectations for the future as they make their electoral choices.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article presents polling data leading up to an election, highlighting Labor's position against the Coalition as well as trends in voter preferences. This analysis will explore the implications of these findings, potential biases in the reporting, and the broader context surrounding the election.

Public Sentiment and Perception Management

The Guardian Essential poll indicates a favorable shift for Labor under Anthony Albanese, suggesting a significant lead over the Coalition. The narrative constructed around Albanese’s rising approval and Dutton’s declining standing appears to aim at reinforcing the perception of Labor’s viability as the governing party. By emphasizing that voters are focused on future benefits rather than past comparisons, the article seeks to shape public sentiment towards Labor's progressive stance. This could be a strategic move to galvanize support for Labor while simultaneously undermining Dutton's credibility.

Implications of Polling Data

The article notes that 32% of voters favor Labor as their first choice, with a two-party preference of 52% to 48%. This statistical framing could be interpreted as an attempt to solidify Labor's position as a frontrunner, which may influence undecided voters. The mention of additional parties like the Greens and One Nation provides context but also highlights potential fragmentation in voter preferences that could dilute the Coalition’s base.

Comparative Analysis with Other Reports

The piece aligns with other published polls, which might suggest a consensus in the polling landscape. However, the Coalition’s claim of differing internal research indicates a tension between public data and party strategies, potentially casting doubt on the reliability of external polls. This dissonance could confuse voters and lead to skepticism about the polling process itself.

Potential Economic and Political Impact

If Labor maintains its lead and forms the government, it could lead to significant shifts in policy, particularly in areas like healthcare, education, and climate change. The economic implications of these policies might affect market sentiments, particularly in sectors sensitive to government spending and regulation. The article does not directly address these economic implications, which could be relevant to investors and market analysts.

Target Audience and Community Engagement

The article appears to cater to a politically engaged audience, particularly those leaning towards progressive values. The focus on approval ratings and voter demographics suggests an intention to resonate with younger voters and women, demographics where Labor shows strength. This targeting may not appeal as much to conservative constituents, indicating a clear ideological division.

Market Reactions and Broader Implications

The publication of such polling data could influence stock markets, especially in sectors tied to government spending and regulation. Investors often react to anticipated policy shifts, making this information critical for financial decision-making. While the article does not delve into specific stock implications, the broader electoral context is indeed relevant for market participants.

Artificial Intelligence Influence

There is no explicit indication that AI was used in the article’s composition. However, the structured presentation of polling data and analysis could suggest the influence of advanced data processing tools, which help in delivering concise information. If AI were involved, it might have shaped the narrative to focus on key findings and trends, thereby steering public discourse.

The nature of this article suggests a level of manipulation through its framing and selective emphasis on favorable statistics for Labor. The language employed presents a narrative that supports Labor’s potential governance while casting doubt on the Coalition’s effectiveness. Such a focus on approval ratings and future-oriented voting may obscure other significant issues facing the electorate, indicating a deliberate shaping of public perception.

In conclusion, this article, while grounded in factual polling data, serves the dual purpose of informing and influencing public opinion in favor of Labor, potentially at the expense of a balanced view of the political landscape.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Anthony Albanese holds an election-winning lead with just days left of the campaign, according to the latest Guardian Essential poll, with Labor leading the Coalition 52% to 48% on a two-party basis.

Albanese’s approval ratings have ticked up slightly since the last poll two weeks ago, but Peter Dutton’s has slipped for the fourth poll in a row, with the Liberal leader’s public standing dropping as the campaign has progressed. TheEssential pollshows more people have switched their support to Labor because of the campaign over recent weeks, and that two-thirds of Australians say they’re voting based on who will leave them better off in three years – rather than comparing their situation to where it was three years ago.

Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter

The final Essential poll before Saturday’s election has found 32% of voters would give Labor their first preference, compared to 34% for theCoalitionand 13% for the Greens. The poll of 2,163 voters found One Nation attracted 10% of first preference support, Trumpet of Patriots 2%, while other independents won 9%.

It would give Labor a total 52.1% on a two-party basis, compared to 47.9 for the Coalition. On Essential’s separate “two-party-plus” vote, which allows voters to remain undecided, Labor was at 49.6% and the Coalition on 45.6%, with 4.8% undecided.

Tuesday’s poll result was a slightly better result for the Coalition fromthe previous poll in mid-April, where Labor was ahead 50% to 45%, with the balance undecided.

The Essential poll isin line with all other published polls. The Coalition has recently claimed that published polls are not in line with their internal research, which they claim paint a rosier picture for Dutton’s prospects of forming government.

The Essential poll finds Labor leads the Coalition among men (51% to 49%) and women (54% to 46%) on a two-party basis. Labor also leads among those aged 18-34 (58% to 42%) and those aged 35-54 (57% to 43%), while the Coalition leads among those over 55 years of age (56% to 44%).

Albanese himself retains a slight negative approval rating, with 44% approving of his performance and 47% disapproving, for a net approval of minus-3%. Albanese’s total approval remained the same from the last poll, but the number of people who “strongly” approve of his performance moved from 10% to 13% over the month.

Dutton’s approval ratings, however, further deteriorated to a net of minus-12% (39% approve, 51% disapprove). It continues a major cratering from December 2024, when Dutton had a plus-3% rating (44% approve, 41% disapprove).

The Liberal leader’s disapproval shot up another three points from mid-April.

Sign up toAfternoon Update: Election 2025

Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters

after newsletter promotion

Asked about the election campaign itself, and how it had affected their vote, 23% of respondents said they were now more likely to vote Labor, compared with 19% of people saying they were more likely to vote Coalition. Another 12% said the campaign made them more likely to vote Greens, 17% said they were more likely to vote independent, while 28% said the campaign had no impact on their voting intention.

A key question at the heart of the election is whether Australians will vote based on their feelings about the last three years of Labor government, or based on their expectations for the coming years. After three years of high inflation, rising prices and concerns about social cohesion, Dutton’s campaign has regularly asked, “are you better off today than three years ago?”

Meanwhile, Albanese and Labor have said Australia is “turning the corner” and that better days are ahead.

Asked what was more important when considering their vote, 66% said they were thinking about which party would make them better off in three years, and 34% said they would think about whether they were better off than three years ago. In December, the last time this question was asked in the Essential poll, the numbers were 68% and 32% respectively.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian