Grenfell: Uncovered review – heartwrenching account of avoidable tragedy

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Documentary 'Grenfell: Uncovered' Explores Causes and Consequences of 2017 Tower Fire"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The documentary "Grenfell: Uncovered," directed by Olaide Sadiq, presents a poignant and harrowing exploration of the catastrophic Grenfell Tower fire that occurred in London in 2017, resulting in the tragic loss of 72 lives. Through moving interviews with survivors and their families, the film uncovers the deep-rooted issues that contributed to this avoidable tragedy. It critiques the complacency of politicians who advocate for deregulation without considering the human cost of such actions. The documentary highlights the role of Eric Pickles, the housing secretary during the tower's refurbishment, whose subsequent elevation to life peerage in 2018 serves as a stark reminder of the lack of accountability for those in power. The film underscores the importance of remembering the victims and the glaring failures of those responsible for ensuring public safety in high-rise buildings.

The documentary, aided by housing journalist Peter Apps, delves into the systemic failures that led to the disaster, including incompetence, greed, and a disregard for safety regulations. The local council's decision to install inexpensive, highly flammable cladding in an effort to improve the tower's aesthetic appeal is particularly criticized. This decision was made despite previous warnings from similar tragedies, such as the Lakanal House fire in 2009, which had already exposed the dangers associated with such materials. The narrative also reveals the lack of awareness among senior London fire brigade officials regarding the cladding's risks, contributing to the flawed policy of instructing residents to remain in their flats during a fire. The film features interviews with key figures, including former Prime Minister Theresa May, who acknowledges existing regulations but suggests they were inadequate. As legal repercussions remain elusive, the documentary calls for the establishment of a database for buildings with unsafe cladding and urges ongoing support for Grenfell survivors, emphasizing the need for vigilance in fire safety to prevent future tragedies.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The 2017 Grenfell Tower fire in London which caused 72 deaths is now the subject ofOlaide Sadiq’s heartwrenching and enraging documentary, digging at the causes and movingly interviewing survivors and their families, whose testimony is all but unbearable. At the very least, the film will remind you that when politicians smugly announce they wish to make a bonfire of regulations, they should be taken, under police escort if necessary, and made to stand at the foot of the tower. As for the housing secretary at the time of the tower’s refurbishment, the abysmally arrogant Eric Pickles, he was made a life peer in 2018.

With the very considerable help of thehousing-issues journalist Peter Apps, the film shows how the horror was created by a perfect storm of incompetence, mendacity, greed, and (that heartsinking phrase) systemic failure. The local council were keen to spruce up its brutalist, concrete (but safe) Grenfell Tower because it was a “poor cousin” and depressing property values. Decorative cladding was just the ticket and the council allowed the installation of the cheapest tiles,made of aluminium composite material which was terrifyingly flammable. A US aluminium firm’s French division sold the council those tiles; in the subsequent inquirythey were accused of suppressing their own researchinto how dangerous another of their products was.

The coalition government of David Cameron, dominated by red-tape-burners, had ignored the terrible warning of the2009 Lakanal House fire, also in London, with comparable cladding which killed six. Other cladding-related fires in other countries had resulted in tighter regulations – but not in the UK. Andsenior officers of the London fire brigade had not been aware of the cladding issueand so failed to update the policy of “stay put”, asking people in tower fires to stay in their flats. Firefighters were courageous, though this was a fatal flaw in their managers’ approach.

Among the government figures, Theresa May, then prime minister, at least has the courage to be interviewed on camera here, though there is something slippery in her statement: “There was regulation there, it just wasn’t up to purpose.” Brian Martin, the civil servant in charge of building regulations at the time, was notoriously dismissive but did have the grace to sound embarrassed at the inquiry. The same can’t be said for Pickles, whohigh-handedly told the inquirythat he didn’t have all day to answer the questions and talked about the “96” deaths – apparently confusing Grenfell with Hillsborough.

Criminal proceedings and convictions and class-action lawsuits seem as far away as ever. What is there left for us in the meantime? To establish a database of all UK buildings that still have the unsafe cladding, always to make sure we know where the stairwell is whenever we check into a hotel or enter any high-rise – and to support the continuing campaign of the survivors.

Grenfell: Uncovered is onNetflixfrom 20 June.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian