Government sells final shares in NatWest 17 years after £45bn bailout

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"UK Government Completes Sale of NatWest Shares, Ending 17-Year State Ownership"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The UK government has officially sold its final shares in NatWest Group, marking the conclusion of a 17-year period of state ownership that began with a £45 billion taxpayer bailout during the 2008 financial crisis. This full privatization is significant for NatWest, previously known as the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS), as it signifies the end of a turbulent chapter in the bank's nearly 300-year history. However, this transition comes at a cost, with taxpayers incurring a £10 billion loss, as the state has only recovered about £35 billion of its initial investment, largely due to the shares' long-term performance, which has remained below the average purchase price of 502 pence per share. In contrast, the government managed to recoup a profit of £900 million from the sale of shares in Lloyds Banking Group, which was privatised in 2017 after receiving £20.3 billion in state aid.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves emphasized that the decision to bail out RBS was necessary to protect millions of savers and businesses, averting a potential collapse that would have had dire economic and social consequences. The government has now exited all banks it previously assisted during the financial crisis, thus marking a pivotal moment in the UK banking sector's recovery. RBS, which became a symbol of the financial sector's failures due to its aggressive expansion under former CEO Fred Goodwin, was forced into state ownership following risky investments, including a £49 billion acquisition of ABN Amro at the market's peak. Since then, RBS underwent a significant restructuring, shedding thousands of jobs and refocusing its operations. The bank eventually returned to profitability in 2018 and rebranded as NatWest in 2020. With the completion of the share sales, NatWest is now fully privately owned, allowing it to move forward while acknowledging the lessons learned from the past financial crisis.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The UK government's sale of its final shares in NatWest Group marks a significant moment, concluding a 17-year state ownership that began with a £45 billion taxpayer bailout during the 2008 financial crisis. The narrative surrounding this sale is complex, reflecting both a sense of closure and the financial implications of the bailout.

Financial Implications and Losses

The government’s exit from NatWest comes with a £10 billion loss to taxpayers, as it only recouped about £35 billion of the initial bailout cost. This raises questions about the effectiveness of the bailout and subsequent management of the bank's shares. In contrast, the government made a profit from the sale of shares in Lloyds Banking Group, highlighting discrepancies in the handling of different banking institutions during the financial crisis.

Symbolism and Political Messaging

The sale is framed as a positive development, symbolizing a return to private ownership and the restoration of confidence in the banking sector. Chancellor Rachel Reeves emphasized the necessity of the initial bailout to protect savers and businesses, suggesting that the government’s actions were justified despite the financial losses. This narrative seeks to frame the government’s past decisions in a favorable light and reassure the public about the stability of the financial system moving forward.

Public Perception and Trust

By portraying the sale as a move towards a new era of economic stability, the government aims to regain public trust. However, the substantial loss incurred may lead to skepticism about the government’s financial stewardship. The public's perception of the banking sector and government accountability could be influenced by this narrative, potentially impacting future political discourse.

Comparative Analysis with Other Banking Bailouts

The article draws comparisons with the Lloyds Banking Group case, where the government earned a profit rather than incurring a loss. This juxtaposition may serve to highlight the complexities and challenges faced during the financial crisis, as well as to mitigate criticism of the NatWest bailout by illustrating that the situation was not entirely hopeless.

Impact on Communities and Stakeholders

The closure of this chapter with NatWest could have implications for various stakeholders, including investors and the general public. The government’s decision to sell may be perceived positively by those advocating for reduced public ownership in banking. However, it may alienate those who feel the financial losses should have been more effectively managed for the benefit of taxpayers.

Market Reactions and Economic Context

The completion of NatWest's privatization might influence market sentiment regarding other financial institutions. Investors may see this as a sign of recovery in the banking sector, though the loss associated with NatWest’s bailout could temper enthusiasm. Analysts and stakeholders in the financial markets will be closely monitoring the implications of this sale on stock prices and investor confidence in UK banks.

Potential Use of AI in Reporting

While it is uncertain if AI was employed in crafting this specific news article, the structured presentation of facts and statistics suggests a level of analytical rigor that might be enhanced by AI tools. If AI were used, it could have influenced the framing of the narrative to emphasize government success in managing economic crises, while downplaying the financial losses.

Overall, the article serves to communicate the completion of a significant financial undertaking by the UK government, while simultaneously addressing the complexities and challenges of managing public funds during a crisis. The framing of the narrative appears aimed at fostering a sense of optimism and stability, despite the underlying financial losses.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The UK has sold its final shares inNatWest Group, ending 17 years of state ownership since the £45bn taxpayer bailout that saved the bank from collapse at the height of the 2008 financial crisis.

The full privatisation of NatWest is a symbolic moment for the banking group – formerly known asRoyal Bank of Scotland(RBS) – and draws a line under the most tumultuous chapter in its near 300-year history.

However, it comes at a £10bn loss to the taxpayer, with the state having only recouped about £35bn of its costs, because its shares have long languished below the average 502p level paid in the bailout.

That compares with the £900m profit recouped from the sale of shares in LloydsBankingGroup, which was privatised in 2017 nine years after receiving £20.3bn in state aid for rescuing HBOS during the banking crash.

The Treasury said that while it did not recover the entirely of the RBS bailout bill, “the alternative would have been a collapse with far greater economic costs and social consequences,” shattering confidence in the UK’s financial system and putting savings and livelihoods at risk.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves, said: “Nearly two decades ago, the then-government stepped in to protect millions of savers and businesses from the consequences of the collapse of RBS.”

“That was the right decision then to secure the economy and NatWest’s return to private ownership turns the page on a significant chapter in this country’s history. We protected the economy in a time of crisis nearly seventeen years ago, now we are focused on securing Britain’s future in a new era of global change.”

The government has now exited all of the banks it helped bail out during the financial crisis, the Treasury said.

RBS became a symbol of the UK banking sector’s implosion during the 2008 global financial crisis, with public ire focusing on itsaggressive expansion under the former chief executive Fred “The Shred” Goodwin. Goodwin was later stripped of his knighthood in 2012, but is now estimated to be receiving a pensionworth nearly £600,000 per year.

In 2007 RBS led a consortium to buy the Dutch bank ABN Amro for £49bn – a huge sum at the top of the market. It was then the largest deal in financial services history, and for a short period made RBS the world’s biggest bank. With £2.2tn in assets, it was more than double the size of the UK economy.

Executives’ excessive spending, which extended to private jets and a lavish £350m campus outside Edinburgh, also stretched the bank’s finances just as the sector was facing a credit crunch.

RBS was eventually forced to take a state bailout in October 2008, with the taxpayer eventually injecting £45bn into the lender, without which millions of customers’ savings would have been put at risk.

It left the government with an 84% stake in the banking group, leading to years of government austerity that many blame for hollowing out public services across the country.

Sign up toBusiness Today

Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning

after newsletter promotion

RBS, for its part, was forced to cancel bonuses and begin a long turnaround that involved slashing tens of thousands of jobs, shrinking its investment bank, and pulling out of almost 50 countries to become a UK-focused lender.

It finally returned to profit in 2018, but ditched the toxic RBS name in 2020, rebranding the group – and its branches in England and Wales – as NatWest.

The government started to recoup its costs through dividends paid out by the lender, and slowly sold its shares through a combination of sales to institutional investors and a drip-feeding of stock into the open market. NatWest alsofast-tracked the processthrough multibillion-pound share buybacks.

That process is now completed, bringing NatWest back into full private ownership nearly two decades after taxpayers saved it from the brink.

NatWest chief executive, Paul Thwaite, said: “This is a significant moment for NatWest Group, for all those who work here and for the UK more widely. As we turn the page on the financial crisis, we can look to the future with confidence, without forgetting the lessons of the past.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian