Godfather of climate science decries Trump’s plans to cut Nasa lab: ‘They’re trying to kill the messenger’

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies Faces Closure Amid Budget Cuts"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), NASA's foremost climate and space monitoring laboratory, is facing shutdown due to the Trump administration's decision to end its lease in Manhattan. Established in 1966, GISS has been pivotal in advancing our understanding of climate change and the universe. It has launched significant scientific careers, including that of a Nobel Prize winner, and has contributed to missions exploring other planets, as well as developing early climate models that highlighted the growing threat of global warming. Despite its storied history and critical contributions, the administration's budget cuts to NASA's Earth science sector have rendered GISS's future uncertain, with 130 staff members now forced into remote work. Dr. James Hansen, a leading figure in climate science and former director of GISS, expressed his dismay, suggesting that the administration's actions signify an attempt to silence crucial climate science amid an atmosphere of denial regarding global warming.

The closure of GISS raises serious concerns about the future of climate research in the U.S. The decision has been framed as a move for efficiency, but critics argue that it represents a broader attack on climate science, as the lab's unique culture and autonomy have been pivotal to its success. Gavin Schmidt, the current director of GISS, lamented the loss of their recently renovated space and noted the emotional impact on staff, who are dedicated to public service and scientific inquiry. As the lab prepares to vacate its premises, the uncertainty looms over where the researchers will be relocated, if at all, and what this means for the continuity of their vital work. The situation reflects a troubling trend in which scientific inquiry is increasingly subject to political whims, raising alarms about the implications for future climate science and policy in an era marked by skepticism towards established scientific consensus.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights the closure of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) under the Trump administration, emphasizing the implications for climate science. It features Dr. James Hansen, a prominent figure in climate research, who criticizes the decision as an attack on vital scientific work. The setting of the story, in a well-known diner, adds a touch of cultural relevance but also serves to humanize the scientists affected by the closure.

The motivation behind this report appears to be a call to attention regarding the diminishing support for climate science during an administration known for its skepticism about climate change. The tone suggests a sense of urgency about the potential loss of scientific expertise and a critique of political decisions impacting environmental research.

Public Perception Influence

The narrative aims to foster a perception of vulnerability within the scientific community, particularly those involved in climate research. By framing the closure as a political attack, it seeks to rally public support for climate science and highlight the detrimental effects of such policy changes.

Potential Concealment of Information

While the article emphasizes the negative impact of the closure, it may downplay other factors influencing NASA's budget decisions, such as shifting priorities or broader economic considerations. This could lead to a one-sided understanding of the issues at play.

Manipulative Elements

The use of emotive language and the portrayal of Dr. Hansen as a victim of the administration's policies can evoke sympathy and anger from readers. This strategy may serve to galvanize public opinion against the administration and reinforce the narrative of an ongoing battle between science and political agendas.

The article's credibility hinges on its sourcing and the authority of Dr. Hansen. His stature in the climate science community lends weight to the argument presented. However, the framing of the story may introduce bias, as it primarily reflects one viewpoint.

Comparison with Other Reports

In relation to other news regarding climate science and government policy, this article amplifies a narrative consistent with ongoing discussions about climate change denial and the threats faced by scientific institutions. It resonates with reports highlighting the erosion of support for science in various sectors.

Impact on Society and Economy

The closure of GISS could have far-reaching implications for climate research and policy-making. It might hinder advancements in understanding climate change, potentially affecting future environmental regulations and public awareness. Economically, this could influence sectors reliant on climate science, such as renewable energy and sustainable development.

Support from Specific Communities

This report is likely to resonate with environmental advocates, scientific communities, and the general public concerned about climate change. It targets those who prioritize scientific integrity and environmental protection.

Market and Economic Repercussions

In the financial markets, this news could sway investor sentiment towards companies engaged in climate-related technologies or research. Stocks in renewable energy sectors may see fluctuations based on perceived governmental support or backlash against anti-science policies.

Geopolitical Relevance

In a broader context, the article underscores ongoing debates about climate change at national and global levels. The actions of the U.S. government in relation to climate science can impact international cooperation and agreements on climate initiatives.

The writing style and presentation of the article do not strongly indicate the use of AI. However, if AI were involved, it might focus on structuring the narrative to emphasize emotional appeal or highlight particular quotes for impact. The language used suggests a conscious effort to engage readers and provoke thought, rather than merely report facts.

Overall, while the article presents valid concerns regarding climate science funding, its framing and emotional appeal suggest an underlying agenda to influence public opinion against the Trump administration's policies.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Perched above theNew YorkCity diner made famous by the TV show Seinfeld, Tom’s Restaurant, a small research laboratory became, improbably, crucial to humanity’s understanding of our changing climate and of the universe itself.

Now, it is being shut down by Donald Trump’s administration.

Nasa’s top climate and space monitoring lab, called theGoddard Institute for Space Studies(Giss), has been housed in six floors of a leased building owned by Columbia University on Manhattan’s Upper West Side since 1966.

Since then, it has launched the career of a Nobel prizewinner, aided missions to Venus and Jupiter,mappedthe Milky Way and alerted the world to global heating by creating one of the firstclimate models. The climate model ran on an IBM computer, the fastest in the world in the 1970s and so gargantuan it took up the entire second floor.

But this storied history has meant little to the Trump administration, which is ending the lab’s lease on 31 May, releasing 130 staff to work from home with an uncertain future ahead. Donald Trump, who has called climate science “bullshit” and a “giant hoax” in the past, wants to slash Nasa’s Earthscience budget in half.

“They are trying to kill the messenger with the bad news, it’s crazy,” said Dr James Hansen, known as the godfather of climate science and previously director of Giss for more than 30 years.

The Guardian talked to Hansen, who was wearing a trademark felt fedora, as he tackled a plate of eggs and bacon at Tom’s Restaurant, which sits below the Giss office. The eggs, as well as some pancakes for your Guardian reporter, were ordered at the barked behest of the manager: “$12 minimum on food! $12! Each!”

The diner is famous – its neon-lit exterior regularly appeared on Seinfeld (photos of Jerry, Kramer and Elaine, some signed, adorn the walls inside) and it inspired Suzanne Vega’s 1980s songTom’s Dinerand so is now regularly thronged by tourists as well as Columbia students, though perhaps less so by Giss staff.

“Are they going to destroy this place? Are they bombing it?” said Hansen about the dismantling of the institution above where we were poking at our food. “That’s the approach of Doge [Elon Musk’s so-called ‘department of government efficiency’] to blow things up, to use a chainsaw,” he said. “That’s a big mistake because science isn’t something you start over. You’ve got a lot of knowledge there.”

Hansen gave Congress and the world its first majorwarningof a climate crisis in 1988 but left Giss in 2013 to speak out more publicly about climate breakdown. Hislatent activismbecame so concerning to Nasa that, Hansen claims, it sought to install a camera outside his office to monitor his movements.

Giss’s independence and nimbleness allowed it to chart the dangerous heating of our planet but also spurred resentment from senior officials who long desired to subsume it within Nasa’s mainGoddard space flight centercampus in Greenbelt, Maryland.

“We survived under a non-supportive situation for decades,” Hansen said. “Somewhat it was a matter of jealousy, of scientists in Greenbelt thinking: ‘Why are these guys getting to this privileged position?’”

Ironically for a place that has produced world-leading climate science for a tiny fraction of Nasa’s budget, however, it will be closed down ostensibly for efficiency reasons. Last month, the US president signed anexecutive ordercalling for a review of all leased federal office space, particularly in cities, to slash costs.

“Over the next several months, employees will be placed on temporary remote work agreements whileNasaseeks and evaluates options for a new space for the Giss team,” a Nasa spokesperson said.

It’s unclear where, or if, such a space will eventuate. The move will likely not even save the federal government any money – the $3m a year lease is between Columbia and a different federal agency and cannot be broken early. Researchers, their books and equipment are being packed up and removed so that the US taxpayer can fund an empty building in New York City’s moneyed Upper West Side.

“Ours is not to reason why,” said Gavin Schmidt, the current Giss director who noted the lab was only recently renovated at a cost of several million dollars. “It is frustrating.” The final weeks of Nasa’s time in Armstrong Hall, the name of the Columbia property, have been marked by team picnics with a farewell party planned among past and present staff.

“There are a few wobbly lips, the contribution of this place to science has been huge and people are emotional about that,” Schmidt said.

“Giss has a unique culture of autonomy, there’s a special sauce here that’s responsible for some really great science. Everyone knows why they are here – they could’ve gone anywhere else but they stay in an office that is dedicated to public service. Science for the public good is imbued in the floors and walls and elevators here.”

The work will, for now, continue in a different, disparate form. “It’s doable but it is disruptive,” said Kate Marvel, a climate scientist at GISS. “People would rather be doing science than thinking about moving. This is a building full of nerds who love doing science, love learning new things about our planet.”

But for how long, and from where? A best case scenario could be that Giss goes into some sort of hibernation before being resurrected under a future administration. Or it could be a terminal end of an era, an apt outcome in an age of anti-enlightenment where climate science is torn fromwebsites,scientistsand theirworkare jettisoned,vaccinesand evenweather forecastingare eyed with suspicion and the president canopinethat therising seaswill happily create balmy new beachfront property.

“I see this as an attack by this administration on climate science,” said van Diedenhoven. “We were afraid of something like this because we saw what was happening at other agencies, so obviously Giss is on their list because of the good climate science done there. I don’t see how it can survive without a building. It’s really quite devastating.”

After making the most of his eggs and bacon, Hansen wandered to the nondescript side-door that gains entry to Giss, to say hello to those who followed him. Shortly after he first came to Columbia, in 1967, the building’s second floor windows were bricked up after student protestseruptedover the Vietnam war. Today a different sort of tumult is in the air – before Hansen can walk in he bumps into a Nasa scientist who is delighted to see him but then swiftly asks: “Do you have space somewhere where I can work?”

Schmidt said he’s unsure what comes next, but that he won’t want to move to Maryland and that others at Giss will feel the same. “People have lives, some just won’t want to go,” he said. “The mission hasn’t changed, though. We’ve punched above our weight for a bunch of folks living above a diner in New York. We’ve had a good run. But it’s not over just yet.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian