Go-to author on White House reverses take on Biden and slams former president

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Whipple's 'Uncharted' Critiques Biden's Leadership and Campaign Performance"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In Chris Whipple's latest book, "Uncharted," he provides a critical examination of President Joe Biden's mental and physical state during his 2024 re-election campaign. Whipple, who previously described Biden as mentally sharp and energetic in his earlier work, now highlights a stark contrast, citing accounts from Biden's inner circle that reveal significant concerns about his cognitive abilities. Notably, senior aide Bruce Reed had previously praised Biden's stamina, but Whipple's new revelations suggest a troubling decline. He recounts a meeting with Ron Klain, Biden's first chief of staff, who described a disoriented and fatigued Biden during debate preparations. Klain noted that Biden seemed out of touch with American politics, leading to a disastrous debate performance against Trump, marked by numerous gaffes and an overall lack of coherence. This shift in perspective raises questions about the reliability of the earlier assessments regarding Biden's capabilities and the implications for his leadership and the Democratic Party.

Whipple's exploration does not solely focus on Biden; it also scrutinizes Vice President Kamala Harris and her campaign's shortcomings. Through interviews with key political figures, including Trump's campaign staff and Democratic strategists, Whipple illustrates a broader narrative of missed opportunities and flawed strategies. He reveals that both parties acknowledged the critical importance of authenticity in political campaigns, with Harris being criticized for her perceived lack of connection with voters. The book paints a comprehensive picture of the political landscape, emphasizing that Biden's departure from the race was not just a personal decision but a reflection of the party's struggle to present a credible and effective leadership moving forward. Whipple's insights compel readers to reconsider the dynamics of the 2024 election and the future of the Democratic Party as it navigates the challenges of a rapidly changing political environment.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the evolving perceptions of President Biden's mental acuity and physical condition, particularly as they relate to his political future. It highlights a stark contrast between earlier assessments by Chris Whipple, who praised Biden's stamina and mental sharpness, and more recent observations that suggest a decline. This shift in narrative raises questions about the motivations behind the reporting and its implications for public perception.

Shifts in Narrative

Initially, Chris Whipple portrayed Biden positively in his book, emphasizing his mental sharpness and impressive endurance. However, the narrative has shifted dramatically following Biden's withdrawal from the 2024 election and the revelations from the special counsel's investigation. These developments have led to a more critical view of Biden's capabilities, suggesting a deliberate attempt to frame the discourse around his fitness for office.

Public Sentiment and Perception

The article seems designed to create a sense of doubt regarding Biden's ability to govern effectively. By contrasting earlier optimistic assessments with recent critiques, it may aim to sway public opinion against him, particularly among undecided voters or those already skeptical of his leadership. This shift could be seen as an effort to align with a broader narrative that questions the viability of older political figures in high office.

Concealment of Other Issues

While the article focuses on Biden's mental acuity, it may be distracting from other potential issues within the political landscape, such as the effectiveness of the current administration's policies or the state of the economy. By centering the discussion on Biden's capabilities, it might divert attention from other pressing matters that could be perceived as more significant failures.

Manipulation Assessment

The article exhibits a degree of manipulation through selective reporting and the framing of Biden’s abilities. The use of vivid examples of his alleged decline, such as forgetfulness during interviews, serves to reinforce a narrative that could sway public sentiment against him. The language used carries a tone that suggests concern, which can influence readers to question Biden's fitness for re-election.

Overall Reliability

While the article references credible sources and recent events, the context and framing suggest a potential bias against Biden. The portrayal of his decline appears to be more sensationalized than objective, leading to questions about the overall reliability of the claims being made.

Impact on Broader Context

This article could influence not just public sentiment but also political dynamics leading up to the next election. It may energize opposition parties and their supporters, while also causing discomfort among Biden’s own base. Furthermore, the focus on his mental and physical capabilities could resonate with broader societal concerns about age and leadership.

In conclusion, the article seems to serve the purpose of shaping a narrative that questions President Biden’s capacity to lead, possibly to prepare the ground for political shifts ahead of the upcoming elections.

Unanalyzed Article Content

“Biden was mentally sharp, even if he appeared physically frail,” Chris Whipple wrote inThe Fight of His Life, his 2023 book on the 46th president, who was then warming up his re-election bid at the age of 80.

In that book, Whipple quoted Bruce Reed, a senior aide, describing a long-distance flight. When others appeared exhausted, Biden was raring to go, Reed said. Biden showed “unbelievable stamina”.

Speakingto the Guardianin January 2023, Whipple said Biden’s “inner circle” was “bullish about Biden’s mental acuity and his ability to govern. I never heard any of them express any concern and maybe you would expect that from the inner circle. Many of them will tell you that he has extraordinary endurance, energy.”

Put it this way: much has happened since.

Obviously, there was that whole 2024 election thing. You know – the one when Biden dropped out after a disastrous debate exposed his decline for all to see. There was also the day in February, before the campaign kicked off, when the special counsel Robert Hur declined to charge Biden with mishandling classified documents, because he found him too addled and sympathetic a prospective defendant.

Hur wrote: “He did not remember when he was vice-president, forgetting on the first day of the interview when his term ended (‘If it was 2013 – when did I stop being vice-president?’) and forgetting on the second day of the interview when his term began (‘In 2009, am I still vice-president?’) … He did not remember, even within several years, when his son Beau died.”

Whipple, a former CBS producer, has emerged as a go-to author on the White House and those who work there. In The Gatekeepers, he examined the lives of chiefs of staff. Then came The Fight of His Life. With hindsight, Whipple seems to have missed key evidence of Biden’s decline.

But Whipple is back with a vengeance. Uncharted, his third book, hits Biden and his aides like a bludgeon.Kamala Harris, who became the Democratic nominee after Biden withdrew, fares little better: Whipple depicts a candidate who never should have been there, a sentiment repeatedly expressed by senior Democrats.

Whipple had access. People talked. Ron Klain, Biden’s first chief of staff, is a key source – and demonstrates startling cognitive dissonance about Biden’s mental and physical decline. Klain says Biden should have stayed in the race – but also gives an absolutely witheringaccountof debate prep at Camp David.

At his first meeting with Biden in Aspen Lodge, the president’s cabin, Klain describes Biden as “startled”. Whipple writes: “He’d never seen him so exhausted and out of it. Biden was unaware of what was happening in his own campaign. Halfway through the session, the president excused himself and went off to sit by the pool.” He fell asleep.

“‘We sat around the table,’” says Klain in the book. “‘And I was struck by how out of touch with American politics he was. He was just very, very focused on his interactions with Nato leaders.’” Klain, Whipple writes, “wondered half-seriously if Biden thought he was president of Nato instead of the US”.

Come the debate against Trump, Biden gave perhaps the worst performance of all time. He shuffled, he stared, he made verbal stumbles and gaffes. He handed Trump the win.

Klain also tags Biden for skipping a post-debate meeting with progressives in favor of a family photoshoot with Annie Leibovitz.

“‘You need to cancel that,’” Klain says he told Biden. “‘You need to stay in Washington. You need to have an aggressive plan to fight and to rally the troops.’” Biden rebuffed him and instead held a Zoom call with the progressives. It went badly.

“‘All you guys want to talk about is Gaza … What would you have me do?’” Biden said. “‘I was a progressive before some of you guys were even in Congress.’”

How do you remind people you’re old without saying you’re old?

Whipple also pays attention to Trump. Susie Wiles, now Trump’s chief of staff, and Karl Rove, a veteran of the George W Bush White House, speak on the record. So does Paul Manafort, a campaign manager in 2016, later jailed and pardoned.

“Democrats wanted to know why Harris had lost to Trump and his MAGA movement,” Whipple writes. “Susie Wiles wanted to know why Harris and her team had run such a flawed campaign.”

Wiles did not view a Trump victory as inevitable. Whipple asks Wiles: “‘Did that mean Harris couldn’t have won?’”

Trump’s campaign chair didn’t mince words.

“‘We’ll never know,’” she replies, “‘because it didn’t seem like she even tried.’

“‘Voters want authenticity … and they didn’t get that from her.’”

Leon Panetta, chief of staff to Bill Clinton, echoed Wiles.

“‘I thought they were thinking they could tiptoe into the presidency without getting anybody pissed off at them,’” he tells Whipple. “‘Baloney. You’ve got to make the American people understand that you’re tough enough to be president of the United States.’”

Rove does take a jab at Trump and Chris LaCivita, the ex-Marine who became a senior adviser. Rove introduced LaCivita to Trump, via the late megadonor Sheldon Adelson, but didn’t think LaCivita would take the gig. “‘I’m surprised because I know what he thinks of Trump,’” Rove tells Whipple. “‘He thinks Trump’s an idiot.’”

LaCivita condemned January 6, after which he “liked” a tweet that urged Trump’s cabinet to invoke the 25th amendment and remove him from power. LaCivitadeleted the post– but did not join the second Trump administration.

Back in 2023, in The Fight of His Life, Whipple wrote: “Presidents do not give up power lightly.” Andy Card, chief of staff to George W Bush, weighed in: “‘If anybody tells you they’re leaving the White House voluntarily, they’re probably lying. This applies to presidents, of any age, who are driven by vast reserves of ego and ambition.’”

Biden did go – but not voluntarily. In Uncharted, in merciless detail, Whipple shows he should have gone much sooner.

Unchartedis publishedin the US by HarperCollins

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian