Ghosts review – gasps and laughter greet this modern revamp of Ibsen’s shocker

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Modern Adaptation of Ibsen's 'Ghosts' Captivates Audiences with Contemporary Themes"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.5
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Henrik Ibsen's 'Ghosts', first published in 1881, faced severe backlash due to its provocative themes, including sexual transgression and suicide, leading to its ban by many booksellers and a lack of staging in Norway. The world premiere occurred in Chicago the following year, prompting Ibsen to respond with 'An Enemy of the People', a play addressing the theme of ostracism. Fast forward to the present, Rachel O’Riordan’s modern adaptation of the play, written by Gary Owen, successfully revives the shock value of Ibsen’s original work in a contemporary context. The production captivates audiences, eliciting gasps and laughter, as it explores themes of guilt and family secrets through a modern lens. The characters are reimagined; for example, the widow Helen Alving becomes Helena, who runs a hospital rather than an orphanage, and her son Oswald is now an aspiring actor named Oz, struggling for opportunities. The maid Regina is updated to Reggie, while the pastor is transformed into an agnostic management consultant, highlighting the shift in societal norms and values since Ibsen's time.

Owen's adaptation retains the core themes of familial and social inheritance, even as it modernizes the narrative. Although some of the original elements, such as the theme of venereal disease, have been omitted, the plot remains gripping and relevant, with a shocking storyline that resonates with contemporary issues. The dialogue is sharp and impactful, imbuing familiar terms like 'home' and 'safe' with darker meanings. The performances are compelling, with Victoria Smurfit’s Helena showcasing a modern woman’s moral struggles, while Callum Scott Howells’ portrayal of Oz adds a layer of sarcasm and excitement. Patricia Allison’s Reggie stands out as a voice of decency amidst the chaos, while Rhashan Stone's character represents the moral ambiguities of modern corporate life. Ultimately, this production of 'Ghosts' not only preserves the intense emotional power of Ibsen’s original but also engages a new generation of theatergoers, regardless of their familiarity with the classic play.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article provides a review of the modern adaptation of Henrik Ibsen's play "Ghosts," highlighting its reception and the changes made by the director and playwright. The adaptation aims to resonate with contemporary audiences while addressing themes of guilt, consent, and societal taboos.

Cultural Context and Relevance

By referencing the historical context of Ibsen's original work, the review underscores the enduring impact of the themes present in "Ghosts." The dramatic shifts in societal norms since 1881 make it challenging for a modern production to evoke the same level of shock. However, the adaptation successfully navigates this by modernizing characters and themes to reflect current societal issues—such as the agnostic pastor representing contemporary moral dilemmas.

Audience Engagement

The article notes the audience's reactions, characterized by gasps and laughter, indicating that the adaptation strikes a chord with viewers. This suggests that the production is effectively engaging with its audience, making it relevant in today's social climate. The positive reception may be seen as an attempt to cultivate a deeper engagement with the themes of the play.

Potential Hidden Agendas

While the article primarily focuses on the play's adaptation, it may also serve to draw attention to the evolving nature of dramatic arts and the importance of addressing taboo subjects in contemporary theatre. By presenting the production in a positive light, the article could be seen as promoting openness and challenging societal norms.

Manipulative Elements

The review does not appear overtly manipulative; however, it subtly encourages a particular view of modern theatre as progressive and relevant. The choice of language and emphasis on audience reactions could influence readers' perceptions of both the adaptation and the original work, perhaps idealizing the modern portrayal while downplaying the complexities of Ibsen's original themes.

Credibility Assessment

This review relies on the opinions of the audience and the artistic decisions made by the director and playwright. The description of the adaptation's themes and audience reactions adds credibility, but the lack of critical perspectives may limit a comprehensive understanding of the production's impact.

Connections to Broader Trends

The emphasis on themes such as guilt and consent aligns with broader societal discussions surrounding mental health and ethics in contemporary discourse, suggesting that the play resonates with ongoing conversations. This connection could enhance public interest in both the theatre and the themes explored within.

Impact on Society and Economics

The positive reception of such adaptations could encourage further investments in the arts, potentially leading to increased funding for modern productions. The influence on societal perceptions of taboo subjects might foster more open discussions in various settings, including educational institutions.

Community Support

The adaptation is likely to appeal to progressive audiences interested in contemporary interpretations of classic works, particularly those who value discussions on societal issues. This demographic may include younger theatre-goers and those engaged in social justice movements.

Market Influence

While the article does not directly address financial markets, the arts sector's health can influence local economies. Investments in theatre productions can have a ripple effect on related industries, such as hospitality and tourism, particularly if the production gains widespread acclaim.

Geopolitical Context

The review does not directly connect to global power dynamics; however, discussions around taboo subjects may reflect broader societal shifts that are relevant in various geopolitical contexts today. The themes of guilt and consent are increasingly significant in global dialogues surrounding ethics and human rights.

Use of Artificial Intelligence

It is unlikely that artificial intelligence specifically crafted this article. However, AI-generated content could have been employed in drafting certain sections or analyzing audience reactions. If AI were involved, it might have influenced the tone and style of the writing to enhance engagement.

In conclusion, the article serves to promote the modern adaptation of "Ghosts," eliciting a positive perception of contemporary theatre while navigating the complexities of taboo subjects. The review's focus on audience reactions and modern themes aims to highlight the relevance of Ibsen's work in today's society.

Unanalyzed Article Content

When Henrik Ibsen published Ghosts in 1881 – plays then were often released as texts with no production scheduled – the content (sexual transgression, venereal disease, suicide) so shocked many booksellers that they banned it. The book was reviewed in newspapers but with such fury that no Norwegian theatre would stage it; Chicago hosted the world premiere the following year. The playwright was so shaken that he wrote a great drama about ostracism,An Enemy of the People.

Almost a century and a half later, and with anything going in most areas of life, it’s tough for a modern production to still deliver a Ghosts spooked by taboos. But Rachel O’Riordan’s staging of Gary Owen’s new version achieves it.

“Complete silence would, in our opinion, be the most fitting reception for this work,” said one late 19th-century media critique. Turning this into a compliment, the 2025 theatre was filled with intense attention, broken by loud gasps at plot twists and laughter for dark jokes implicit in the original but spoken louder here.

Owen and O’Riordan memorably relocated Euripides to modern Cardiff inIphigenia in Splottand similarly update Ghosts. Helen Alving becomes Helena, still the guilt-haunted widow of a local hero, though honouring him not with an orphanage but a hospital funded by private equity. Her troubled artist son, Oswald, turns into Oz, an actor short on auditions. The Alving’s maid, Regina, and carpenter father, Jacob, retain their relationship and roles, though she goes by Reggie. In the most striking modernisation, Pastor Manders, the creepy priest, becomes an agnostic management consultant, Andersen, whose church is Zoom and his bible workplace guidelines.

The original contains (1881 plot-spoiler) a strand about assisted dying that is hotly topical now. Owen boldly jettisons that and the VD theme but still constructs a shocking plot around guilt, consent and, drawing audible shock, a plot line overlapping with season three of HBO’sThe White Lotus. The play’s theme of terrible familial and social inheritance survives in jagged dialogue that gives “home” and “safe” dark new meanings.

Ghosts exemplifies Ibsen’s creed that the key events of a play take place before it starts: everyone is either hiding, or having hidden, something from them. The actors grippingly chart the negotiation of these secrets and suspicions. Victoria Smurfit’s Helena shows how the greater agency of a modern Mrs Alving has not prevented moral compromises but also allows her contemporary solutions. Callum Scott Howells as Oz is sassy, sarcastic but ecstatic at the prospect even of dangerous love. Patricia Allison’s confident, rebellious Reggie movingly becomes the story’s core of common decency. Rhashan Stone plausibly makes a corporate fixer the equivalent of a sanctimonious cleric and Deka Walmsley’s Jacob trails the exhaustion of a man who has kept quiet to survive.

Crucially, this Ghosts, retaining the toxic power of the original, will grip whether you know the play or don’t.

At Lyric Hammersmith, London, until 10 May

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian