Fruit stickers are annoying and bad for the environment. So why did an Australian ban come unstuck?

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"South Australia Delays Ban on Fruit Stickers Amid Industry Concerns"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In Australia, an astonishing 5.62 billion plastic stickers are removed from fruits and vegetables annually, contributing approximately 110 tonnes of plastic waste to landfills. These stickers, which are often deemed annoying by consumers, serve a practical purpose by providing essential information about the produce, such as its variety and origin, through a price look-up code system. Despite widespread public support for a ban on these stickers, particularly in South Australia, the implementation of such a ban has faced delays. The South Australian government had initially planned to enforce a ban on these plastic labels alongside other problematic plastics by September, but requests from growers and industry bodies for additional time led to the postponement of this deadline. This situation reflects a broader challenge faced by various jurisdictions in Australia and New Zealand as they attempt to phase out single-use plastics, particularly given the complexities involved in transitioning to alternative labeling methods.

Environmental advocates have raised concerns about the ecological impact of these stickers, particularly when they contaminate organic waste streams or contribute to litter. Experts like Ryan Collins from Planet Ark emphasize that these plastic labels can disrupt composting processes and harm wildlife when they enter the environment. While there are potential alternatives, such as compostable stickers or fruit tattoos, these options are not yet available at a commercial scale. The South Australian environment minister, Dr. Susan Close, reassured the public that the government remains committed to phasing out fruit stickers and will work collaboratively with industry stakeholders over the next year to find feasible solutions. Other Australian states, including New South Wales and Tasmania, are also exploring similar initiatives, reflecting a collective effort to address the pressing issue of plastic waste in the region.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Fruit stickers may be small, but they can bemighty annoying.

Each year 5.62bn plastic labels are picked off fruit and vegetables in Australia,data shows. Those that are not accidentally eaten, washed down the sink orburied in compost, usually end up in landfill, adding about 110 tonnes of plastic to the pile.

South Australia was set to ban the stickers from September, along with other problematic plastics like soy sauce fish, and it would have been the first Australian jurisdiction to do so.

Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton’s Clear Air column as a free newsletter

Residents overwhelminglysupported the proposed ban. “These are so bloody annoying and unnecessary,” one wrote in a submission. “I hate these stickers and consider them totally unnecessary on my fruit products,” said another.

But the stickers will be sticking around a little longer.

This week SA shelved its September deadline, after growers and industry bodies asked for more time. Meanwhile, across the Tasman Sea, New Zealand’s ban, instituted in 2023, has beenput on hold.

Are fruit sticker bans coming unstuck?

The plastic labels become a problem when they end up in home compost or in the curbside organics bin, says Ryan Collins, the head of research at Planet Ark.

“If they’re left on those scraps, on the skin, and they go into curbside collection, then it ends up being a contaminant for the organics processor or composter,” he says. That becomes a cost and quality issue for organic waste companies, whose products are used in agriculture and urban landscaping.

They could also become litter, Collins says.

Cip Hamilton, the plastics campaign manager at the Australian Marine Conservation Society, says the stickers often end up in compost bins and eventually contaminate the soil. “Once in the environment, plastics are almost impossible to recover. Plastic fragments can cause devastating impacts to our wildlife and ecosystems.”

The plastic labels, glued to the skin of apples, bananas, pears and more, are for convenience: there is nothing in Australia’s Food Standards Code that requires retailers to label fresh fruits and vegetables.

Most include a PLU: the acronym for price look-up code, four or five digits used to identify the variety of fruit and how it was grown – part of a voluntary global system for categorising fresh produce. Some featureeye-catching designs.

The stickers are the best option for providing information to consumers and retailers (about origin, variety and price) with the least amount of packaging, the Australian Fresh Produce Alliance saidin a submissionlast year.

“Additionally, they play a vital role in inventory management, traceability, reducing food waste and quality control for both producers and retailers.”

Sign up toClear Air Australia

Adam Morton brings you incisive analysis about the politics and impact of the climate crisis

after newsletter promotion

There were non-plastic alternatives – like compostable stickers – the industry group said, but they were not yet available at commercial scale.

Fruit tattoos – labels lasered on to skin or peel – have also emerged as an option, trialled by producers and supermarketsacross Europeandthe UK.

Several Australian jurisdictions have flagged fruit stickers for the chopping block, as they look to get rid of single-use plastics. And governments have agreedthey are a priority, where better coordination is needed.

The South Australian environment minister, Dr Susan Close, said the state remained committed to the reform. “Many South Australians told us through previous surveys and consultations that they ‘loathed’ fruit stickers as an inconvenience to remove before they recycle their food scraps.”

It was a short delay – rather than a stop – Close said, and over the next 12 months the government would be working with growers, industry bodies and other jurisdictions.

New South Waleshas proposedto require compostable labels by the end of 2030. In Tasmania, fruit stickers have been slated for the second stage of the state’ssingle-use plastic phase-out.

New Zealand, which has delayed its bar on non-compostable labels to 2028 toalign with the EU, was “not stepping back from its leadership role in tackling plastic waste”, the environment minister, Penny Simmonds, said.

“We are taking a more measured approach to ensure that alternatives are available, that industry has time to adapt, and that any changes are well-considered and manageable so that cost-of-living impacts are limited for businesses and households.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian