Forget the DEI hires – meet Trump’s latest WTF hire | Arwa Mahdawi

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Concerns Raised Over Qualifications of Trump's Nominee for Surgeon General"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

During recent congressional hearings, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the U.S. health secretary known for his controversial views on medicine, expressed skepticism about lawmakers seeking his opinions on vaccines. He stated, 'What I would say is my opinions about vaccines are irrelevant,' emphasizing that people should not seek medical advice from him. This admission raised concerns about the qualifications of those in key health positions. The article argues that it would be prudent for the government to appoint individuals with substantial medical expertise rather than those with questionable credentials. Dr. Casey Means, recently nominated for U.S. surgeon general, exemplifies this issue. Although she holds a medical degree and has been vocal about health concerns, she lacks an active medical license and has not completed her residency, raising doubts about her suitability for the role of the nation's doctor.

The nomination of Dr. Means has sparked criticism not only for her qualifications but also for her alignment with the 'Make America Healthy Again' (MAHA) movement, which focuses on issues like processed food and health industry corruption but also delves into conspiratorial territory. Despite her popularity among some MAHA supporters, there is infighting regarding her extremity on issues like vaccines, with some factions demanding a more radical stance. Laura Loomer, a far-right influencer, has publicly criticized Means for her unconventional views, including her interest in psychedelic substances. The article reflects on the broader implications of such appointments in the Trump administration, suggesting that the focus has shifted away from qualifications to a preference for loyalty and ideology, particularly affecting women and minorities who are often dismissed as 'DEI hires.' The conclusion warns that regardless of the outcome of Means's nomination, the likely appointee may be equally unqualified to address the pressing health issues facing the nation.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights the concerning trend in recent appointments within the U.S. government, particularly in health-related positions. The author critiques Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s unconventional views on vaccines and emphasizes the lack of qualified medical professionals in significant government roles, using Dr. Casey Means as a notable example.

Critique of Government Appointments

The commentary suggests that the current administration's approach to health leadership raises questions about the qualifications of its appointees. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s dismissive attitude toward his own authority on vaccine matters illustrates a troubling disconnect between government officials and the expertise typically expected in health policy. The author expresses a desire for scientifically knowledgeable individuals to be appointed to health positions, indicating a belief that the public deserves competent leadership in matters of public health.

Concerns About Dr. Casey Means

Dr. Casey Means, nominated for U.S. Surgeon General, is presented as a controversial choice. Although she holds a doctorate, her lack of completed medical residency and absence of an active medical license raise red flags regarding her qualifications. This highlights a growing trend of appointing individuals more connected to social media influence than to practical medical experience. The implication is that such appointments undermine the seriousness of health governance and public trust.

Public Perception and Trust

The article seeks to instill skepticism among readers regarding the credibility of health leadership in the U.S. The tone suggests a call to action for the public to demand better qualifications for those in power, especially when it comes to health-related decisions. The author’s frustration reflects a broader concern about the erosion of trust in government institutions and their ability to manage health crises effectively.

Potential Manipulation and Bias

The narrative could be seen as manipulative due to its stark criticism of specific individuals without presenting counterarguments or broader context about the political landscape. The choice of language and the focus on disqualifying factors in Means’ career could serve to create a negative perception of her potential role.

Evaluation of Reliability

While the article presents valid concerns about qualifications in government appointments, it is also essential to consider the author's potential bias against the current administration. The piece emphasizes sensational aspects of the appointments, which could color the reader's perception. Thus, while it raises important issues, the reliability of the claims may be affected by the author's perspective.

Societal and Economic Implications

The commentary may resonate with communities advocating for science-based policies and could influence public discourse around health leadership. This could lead to increased scrutiny of future appointments and a push for reform in how health officials are selected. The emphasis on qualifications may also impact political campaigns and voter sentiment regarding health-related issues.

Target Audience

This piece is likely to attract readers who are skeptical of current political leadership, particularly those concerned with public health and science. It aims to engage an audience that values expertise in government roles and is critical of the influence of social media personalities in serious positions.

Market Impact

While the article itself may not directly influence stock markets or economic indicators, the implications of government health policies and leadership can have broader effects on health-related industries, including pharmaceuticals and healthcare services. Stakeholders in these sectors may take note of public sentiment as expressed in articles like this.

Global Relevance

The issues raised in this article reflect ongoing debates about public health management and governance worldwide. As countries navigate health crises, the qualifications and credibility of their leaders remain a critical concern, making this topic relevant beyond U.S. borders.

In conclusion, the article serves as a critique of the current state of health leadership in the U.S., raising essential questions about qualifications and public trust while potentially manipulating public perception through selective emphasis on negative aspects of specific individuals' backgrounds.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The US health secretary doesn’t think you should really listen to him when it comes to health issues. During an appearance before House and Senate committees this week,Robert F Kennedy Jr, famous for his unconventional views about medicine and his revelation that aparasite ate part of his brain, seemed to think it was strange that lawmakers were asking him about vaccines.

“What I would say is my opinions about vaccines are irrelevant,”Kennedy saidwhen pressed on whether he would vaccinate his child for measles. “I don’t want to seem like I’m being evasive, but I don’t think people should be taking advice, medical advice, from me.” The US health secretary repeated his refrain about not wanting to give advice a number of other times.

I, on the other hand, am desperate to dole out a bit of advice. Namely: it would probably be a good idea if a few people who actually knew what they were talking about were brought into the US government. I know, I know. Look at me being a crazy idealist! Still, at the very least, it might be wise to at least ensure that the people who are in charge of health issues know a thing or two about medicine.

Alas, judging by some ofDonald Trump’s latest appointments, it would seem that I am asking far too much. See, for example,Dr Casey Means, who wasnominatedfor US surgeon general last week. Means has got “Dr” in front of her name, which sounds promising, but she’s more of an influencer than a practitioner. Though she trained as a surgeon at Stanford, she never completed her medical residency afterward. Why? She says it’s because she was disillusioned with traditional medicine, but a former colleague told theLos Angeles Timesthat it was due to anxiety. Means also doesn’t have an active medical license. In short: she wouldn’t be able to get a job as a doctor at your local hospital but she’s being considered for the role of “the nation’s doctor”. As for experience working in government? She doesn’t have any of that, either.

What Means does have, Trump announced in a recent social media post, are “impeccable ‘MAHA’ credentials”. That’s the “Make America healthy again” movement: a movement that is preoccupied with some very valid issues (processed food, corruption in the health industry) but mired in conspiracist thinking. Means has been on TV a lot to talk about Maha obsessions such asremoving fluoride from drinking water. She also makes money from dietary supplements that she promotes on social media and has co-authored a book with her brotherthat claims“almost every chronic health symptom that Western medicine addresses is the result of our cells being beleaguered by how we’ve come to live”. Which, of course, isn’t completely false but has been accused of being overly simplistic. Means’s brother, by the way, is also a prominent adviser to Kennedy.

So are all the Maha crowd rejoicing in the streets at the idea of Means becoming surgeon general? Not quite. Her nomination hasactually sparked Maha infighting. Some Maha voices think Means is not extreme enough, particularly when it comes to the Covid shot. These people seem to want a surgeon general who declares Covid was a hoax and bans vaccines altogether.

The far-right conspiracy theoristLaura Loomer, meanwhile, who seems to have become one of Trump’s most influential albeit unofficial advisers, isn’t happy with Means because she thinks she’s unserious.Writing on Twitter/X, Loomer said Means “PRAYS TO INANIMATE OBJECTS, COMMUNICATES WITH SPIRIT MEDIUMS, USES SHROOMS AS ‘PLANT MEDICINE’ AND TALKS TO TREES! SHE ALSO DOESN’T EVEN HAVE AN ACTIVE MEDICAL LICENSE.”

Loomer isn’t theonly one a little worriedabout Means’s enthusiasm for psychedelic drugs including magic mushrooms – which the prospective surgeon general once suggested in a newsletter helped her find a romantic partner. Psilocybin, a psychedelic compound found in certain mushrooms, is currently listed as a schedule I drug, defined as a substance “with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse”.

Means should probably be a little worried about what Loomer thinks, as Loomer may have played a part in ousting Trump’s original pick for the position. That wasJanette Nesheiwat, a former Fox News medical contributor and the sister-in-law ofMike Waltz, the former national security adviser. On X this month, Loomer called Nesheiwat “a pro-Covid vaccine nepo appointee” who “didn’t go to medical school in the US”. (Nesheiwat has said that she got a degree from the University of Arkansas School of Medicine, but it would seem that she actually earned her medical degree from a school in Sint Maarten.)

Will Loomer topple Means before her confirmation (which hasn’t been scheduled yet) as well? I don’t know but I can tell you that if she does, it’s unlikely that her successor will be any more qualified. TheTrump administration, as we all know, has been waging war on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). If you’re a (non-Trump-loving) woman or a minority, it doesn’t seem to matter how many qualifications you have, you’re automatically considered a “DEI hire” and looked upon with suspicion. Many prominent people in the Trump administration, meanwhile, seem to be WTF hires. They are there because they’re white, Trumpy and often in the family of someone influential (or they have been on Fox News). Whether we get Means or not, you can be sure that whoever is confirmed as the nation’s top doctor will be completely unqualified to treat the US’s Trump-induced ailments.

Arwa Mahdawi is a Guardian columnist

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian