Five vice-chancellors in Victoria paid more than $1m in 2024, prompting claims of ‘largesse’

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Victoria's Vice-Chancellors See Salary Increases Amid Financial Struggles"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In Victoria, a recent report has revealed that despite ongoing scrutiny regarding university governance and executive compensation, six out of nine vice-chancellors received pay increases or maintained their salaries from the previous year. Notably, five vice-chancellors earned over $1 million annually, with Duncan Maskell of the University of Melbourne leading the pack at $1.5 million for 2024, despite the institution facing a significant operating deficit. Maskell's pay was adjusted to $1.4 million in 2023, yet the university's financial situation worsened, with a reported deficit of $99 million this year. A university spokesperson attributed the salary increase to annual leave entitlements, a claim met with skepticism by critics who argue that such increases are indicative of excessive executive compensation amid financial struggles in the sector.

The National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU) has voiced strong objections to the rising salaries of vice-chancellors, calling it an example of 'executive largesse.' Dr. Alison Barnes, the union president, highlighted a disparity where 306 senior executives earn more than their respective state premiers, and criticized the ongoing trend of raising executive pay while universities claim budget deficits necessitate job cuts. While some vice-chancellors, like those at the University of Divinity and La Trobe University, took pay cuts, the overall trend indicates a troubling disconnect between university financial health and executive compensation. The education minister has pointed out the need for improved governance and compliance in the sector, as the universities continue to navigate their financial challenges, with some universities reporting deficits while others, like Swinburne and Victoria University, managed to post surpluses. The situation raises critical questions about the priorities and management practices within Victoria's higher education institutions.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the significant salaries of vice-chancellors in Victoria's universities, highlighting the ongoing debate around executive compensation amid financial challenges faced by these institutions. The growing public concern over governance issues and perceived excessive pay raises for senior executives is emphasized, drawing attention to the disparity between administrative salaries and budget constraints that lead to job cuts.

Public Sentiment and Outrage

The article reflects a rising sentiment of discontent among the community regarding the remuneration packages of university leaders. With five vice-chancellors earning over $1 million, there is a palpable frustration, particularly as institutions report substantial operating deficits. The statement from Dr. Alison Barnes of the National Tertiary Education Union underscores the disconnect between financial challenges faced by universities and the continued escalation of executive pay, suggesting a deeper issue with governance.

Governance Concerns

The article points out that despite previous recommendations for governance reforms, the situation appears unchanged. The reference to the Universities Accord indicates that there is an acknowledgment at the governmental level of the need for improvement. However, the lack of significant action towards addressing the governance issues raises questions about the effectiveness of oversight and accountability in the higher education sector.

Implications for Stakeholders

This news could have widespread implications for various stakeholders, including students, faculty, and policymakers. As universities grapple with budget deficits while senior executives receive substantial pay increases, the potential for public backlash could influence future funding and policy decisions. The article suggests that continued reports of such disparities might lead to calls for reform, impacting how universities operate and allocate resources moving forward.

Community Impact

The article likely resonates more with community groups and individuals concerned about educational equity and fiscal responsibility within public institutions. It may serve to mobilize public opinion against what is perceived as mismanagement and excessive spending at the top levels of university administration.

Financial Market Reactions

While the article focuses primarily on governance and salary concerns, it does not directly address implications for financial markets. However, if public dissatisfaction leads to changes in university funding or governance, it could indirectly affect university endowments and related investments. Investors in educational institutions may want to monitor how governance issues influence operational stability and reputation.

Global Relevance

This issue is part of a broader global conversation about executive pay and governance in public institutions, especially in times of economic strain. The findings might resonate with similar discussions in other countries facing comparable challenges in higher education funding and governance.

The article appears to be grounded in factual reporting, highlighting specific salary figures and quotes from relevant stakeholders. However, it also carries an implied critique of the current state of university governance, which could be seen as a form of advocacy for reform. The focus on executive compensation amid fiscal challenges suggests an agenda to provoke discussion and potentially push for accountability within the sector.

In conclusion, while the article presents verifiable data regarding vice-chancellor salaries, it also aims to raise awareness about governance issues and the need for reform in the university sector, reflecting ongoing public concerns about educational equity and financial responsibility.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Just three of Victoria’s vice-chancellors took pay cuts last year despite growing outside pressure to address“broken” university governanceand accusations of “executive largesse”.

The universities’ latest annual reports,tabled in state parliamenton Tuesday, showed six of Victoria’s nine vice-chancellors increased their pay or left it unchanged last year compared with 2023.

Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email

Five were paid more than $1m annually, none higher than the University of Melbourne’s Duncan Maskell, whose salary hit $1.5m in 2024 before his retirement this year.

Maskell’s pay was reduced to $1.4m in 2023 amid an operating deficit of $71m. Last year, the university recorded a larger deficit of $99m, the report revealed.

A spokesperson for the university said the main reason for the remuneration increase was annual leave entitlements, paid on completion of the contract.

The president of the National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU), Dr Alison Barnes, said despite “years of community outrage”, Victoria’s chancellors were continuing to sign off on “even more executive largesse”.

A November report by the NTEU found306 senior executives were earning more than the premiers of their university’s state, at an average of six per institution.“On one hand, universities blame budget deficits for job cuts, and with the other they push vice-chancellor pay into the stratosphere,” she said.“Add these insulting pay bumps to the sky-high pile of evidence showing university governance is completely broken.”

The education minister, Jason Clare, has previously flagged that theUniversities Accord, handed down last year, “made clear” that university governance needed to be strengthened and workplace relations compliance improved in the tertiary sector.

The largest pay bump went to Swinburne University’s Prof Pascale Quester, who received a $130,000 annual increase to a total salary of $1.1m.

Deakin University ($1m), Victoria University ($850,000) and Federation University ($910,000) also increased the pay of their vice-chancellors by $50,000, $10,000 and $20,000 respectively. RMIT’s vice-chancellor’s pay remained unchanged at about $1m.

Overall, six universities were in the red in 2024 and three posted a surplus – including Swinburne ($28.1m), Victoria University ($66.1m) and RMIT ($1.8m), however overall deficits largely improved on 2023.

A spokesperson for Victoria University said the vice-chancellor, Prof Adam Shoemaker, had received his first increase, in alignment with public sector benchmarks, since his appointment in 2021.

Shoemaker said 2024 had been a “remarkably successful year for VU, but our work continues in the context of the University Accord”.

Sign up toBreaking News Australia

Get the most important news as it breaks

after newsletter promotion

A Federation University spokesperson said the vice-chancellor’s $910,000 salary was set independently by the University Council and benchmarked against other sectors and peer institutions.

They said under Prof Duncan Bentley’s leadership, the university had dramatically reduced student attrition, grown domestic student numbers by 15% and improved in its rankings and equity performance.

A Swinburne spokesperson said its surplus would be reinvested in “even better facilities, technology and campus upgrades, and ensuring our financial sustainability”.

The vice-chancellor of the University of Divinity, Prof James McLaren, took a pay cut of about $40,000, paid $210,000 to $219,999 annually amid a $289,000 deficit, the reports showed, as did La Trobe University’s vice-chancellor, Prof Theo Farrell.

Farrell, who commenced the role last year, earned between $860,000 and $869,999 in 2024, $100,000 less than the previous vice-chancellor. The salary of Monash University’s vice-chancellor was reduced from $1.5m to $1.1m.

A Monash University spokesperson said the reduction was principally due to the departure of the previous vice-chancellor.

Excluding philanthropic funds, donations and investment income, Monash University’s underlying result was a $6m deficit, an improvement on its $123.5m deficit in 2023.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian