Fist fights, ghostly pranks and schism: a brief history of conclaves past

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Historical Overview of Papal Conclaves: Secrecy, Factionalism, and Notable Incidents"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Modern conclaves are characterized by strict secrecy, with cardinal electors and their supporting staff swearing oaths to maintain confidentiality. Before the upcoming conclave, the Sistine Chapel will undergo rigorous security measures, including the sweeping for electronic surveillance devices and the installation of jamming technology to prevent unauthorized listening. This modern approach contrasts sharply with historical conclaves, where personal accounts from cardinals and their attendants revealed the often tumultuous and dramatic nature of the papal elections. For instance, one notable event involved the election of Pope Fabian, who was believed to be divinely chosen after a dove landed on his head. In stark contrast, the election of Celestine IV was marred by poor conditions and factional strife, resulting in a pope who died just 17 days after his election, having never been officially enthroned.

The longest papal election in history took place over two years and nine months, primarily due to infighting among cardinals. Locked in the Palazzo dei Papi by frustrated locals, the cardinals faced severe deprivation, which ultimately led them to elect Gregory X, who established the conclave system to streamline future elections. The political and social pressures surrounding papal elections have often resulted in extraordinary circumstances; for instance, during the election of Urban VI, a mob's threats of violence prompted a hasty decision by the cardinals. The subsequent schism that followed, with rival popes in Rome and Avignon, lasted for four decades. Several conclaves have been marked by bizarre incidents, such as fistfights among cardinals and ghostly pranks, reflecting the high tensions and unique personalities involved in these historic decisions. The conclave that elected John Paul II marked a significant moment, as he became the first non-Italian pope in 455 years and went on to become one of the most beloved pontiffs in history, serving for 27 years.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article delves into the intriguing history of papal conclaves, highlighting both the solemnity and the chaos that have characterized these secretive gatherings over the centuries. It presents a narrative that captures the reader's imagination, showing how the process of electing a pope has evolved into a highly guarded affair, contrasting sharply with past events that were often rife with conflict and drama.

Purpose of the Article

The intent behind the publication seems to be to engage readers in the historical context of the papal election process. By recounting vivid stories of past conclaves filled with tension, illness, and even desperation, the article seeks to create a sense of intrigue and reflection on the significance of the papal selection today. This not only educates the audience about the complexities involved but also invites contemplation on the current practices compared to historical precedents.

Public Perception

By presenting a historical overview filled with dramatic elements, the article may foster a perception of the papacy as an institution fraught with challenges and controversies. This can lead the audience to view the process of electing a pope as a more dynamic and contentious affair than it may appear at face value. The juxtaposition of past events with modern-day practices could highlight the tension between tradition and contemporary security measures.

Potential Concealments

There might be an underlying intention to draw attention away from more current issues facing the Church or the global community. By focusing on historical conflicts, the article could inadvertently mask ongoing controversies or debates within the Church today, inviting readers to ponder the past rather than address present challenges.

Manipulative Nature

While the article does not overtly manipulate information, it does employ a storytelling technique that could influence readers' emotions and perceptions. The choice of language and the focus on historical turmoil could evoke a sense of drama that overshadows rational discourse on the current state of the papacy.

Overall Credibility

The information presented appears to be rooted in historical accounts and scholarly insights, lending credibility to the narrative. However, the article's focus on sensational aspects of past conclaves may skew the audience's understanding if not balanced with contemporary context.

Societal Impact

The discussions around conclaves could have implications for the Catholic Church's image, potentially impacting its followers' trust and engagement. As the public reflects on the tumultuous history, it may lead to increased interest or skepticism regarding the Church's current governance and transparency.

Target Audience

This article likely appeals to a broad audience interested in history, religion, and governance, particularly those with a curiosity about the complexities of the papal election process. It may resonate more with individuals who appreciate historical narratives and the interplay of tradition and modernity.

Market Influence

Although the article itself may not have direct implications for financial markets, it could influence perceptions of organizations associated with the Church. Stocks of companies linked to the Catholic Church or those that operate in religious tourism could be indirectly affected by shifts in public sentiment concerning the Church's leadership.

Geopolitical Relevance

The article connects to broader themes of governance, authority, and tradition, which are relevant in many global contexts. As discussions of leadership and transparency continue to evolve, the historical lens offered in this piece provides a backdrop for understanding current dynamics within the Church and beyond.

Use of AI in Writing

It's plausible that AI tools may have been employed to assist in drafting or structuring the article, especially in retrieving historical data and synthesizing information. If AI was involved, it might have shaped the narrative's coherence and flow, ensuring that historical facts were presented in an engaging manner. However, the emotional and dramatic elements suggest a human touch in crafting the storytelling aspect.

In conclusion, while the article presents a compelling narrative rooted in historical events, it also serves to provoke thought about the ongoing evolution of the papacy and the complexities that accompany it.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Modern-day conclaves are steeped in mystery: cardinal electors swear an oath of secrecy – and so do the cooks, drivers, medics and others who support their deliberations. Before the conclave begins next week, the Sistine Chapel will be swept for electronic bugs, jamming devices will be installed, and special coatings will be placed on windows to stop laser scanners picking up anything audible.

It wasn’t always this way: in the past, letters, diaries and other writings by cardinals and their attendants gave revealing accounts of what happened in the meetings convened in order to choose a pope.

Here, with the help of the historians Vanessa Corcoran of Georgetown University in Washington and Miles Pattenden of the University of Oxford, we look at some of the more noteworthy conclaves from the past.

This was the year that a dove landed on the head of a priest named Fabian, which the cardinals took to be the Holy Spirit descending upon him. Fabian was unanimously elected pope.

Cardinals were locked inside Rome’s Septizodium Palace in stifling heat and unsanitary conditions. One died and several fell ill, and the factions were unable to agree on a new pope.Frustrated by the slow deliberations, Romans threatened to dig up the recently departed Gregory IX’s body. Eventually the cardinals chose an aged and enfeebled man, who took the name of Celestine IV. He died 17 days later, before he had even been enthroned.

The longest papal election in history lasted two years and nine months – mainly due to factional infighting between cardinals. Three of the 20 cardinal electors died before a decision was made.

The cardinals met in the city of Viterbo, which was made the papal base as Rome had descended into criminality. Two years after they began their deliberations, exasperated local people took drastic measures to try to force a conclusion. They locked the cardinals in the Palazzo dei Papi, walled up the doors and windows, and reduced rations to bread and water. When that failed they removed the roof, exposing the cardinals to the elements.

Amid these austere conditions, the cardinals at last agreed on Tebaldo Visconti, who became Gregory X. One of his first acts was to create the conclave, with daily voting, as a way of electing future popes.

The papacy had only recently returned to Rome after 70 years in Avignon, in modern-day France. Gregory XI, a Frenchman, died soon after. As the cardinals met to decide his successor, a mob – fearing that the return to Rome would be short-lived – surrounded the conclave, demanding they choose a Roman pope – and“se non che tutti vi occideremo”(“if not we will kill you all”).

The cardinals swiftly elected Bartolomeo Prignano from Naples, who became Urban VI. But he was a disaster, and within a few months some of the cardinals had declared his election invalid and held a rival conclave. Their choice, Clement VII, re-established a papal court in Avignon. The schism lasted four decades, with each line of popes claiming to be the true successor and excommunicating the other.

The college of cardinals met for the first time in the newly built Sistine Chapel. One of their number, Rodrigo Borgia, a powerful and wealthy man who fathered several children with a string of mistresses, offered his colleagues lucrative sinecures in exchange for their votes. He duly became Alexander VI.

The death of Pius III led to the shortest conclave in history. Within a few hours, Giuliano della Rovere, a man of little charm and with a violent temper, had become Julius II, also known as the “warrior pope” for personally leading military campaigns on behalf of the papal states. He also began the rebuilding of St Peter’s Basilica and established the Swiss Guard.

The conclave that elected Paul V included a fist fight between cardinals in which they ripped the lacy bits off their rochets.

A group of young cardinals, bored with weeks-long deadlock, decided to play a prank on older colleagues. One dressed up as the Holy Ghost and surprised older members of the college in the dead of night. A cardinal is said to have died of pneumonia after falling and lying on a cold floor in shock after a nocturnal visit.

This conclave elected a man who became the longest reigning pope after St Peter, the first pope. Pius IX was pontiff for 31 years.

There were two conclaves this year, in August and again in October following the 33-day tenure of John Paul I. The second conclave chose the first non-Italian pope for 455 years when they elected the Polish cardinal Karol Wojtyla. The charismatic John Paul II – later canonised byPope Francis– became one of the most popular pontiffs of all time and spent 27 years as the head of the Roman Catholic church.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian