First Nations writer stripped of $15,000 State Library of Queensland award over Gaza tweet

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"State Library of Queensland Withdraws Fellowship from Indigenous Writer Over Controversial Gaza Tweet"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The State Library of Queensland has made the controversial decision to suspend its national Indigenous fellowships and withdraw the $15,000 black&write! fellowship awarded to First Nations writer Karen Wyld, who writes under the name K A Ren Wyld. This decision was made in response to a social media post she made regarding the Gaza conflict, shortly before the award ceremony was scheduled to take place. The library’s chief executive, Vicki McDonald, informed Wyld of the cancellation just minutes after she arrived for the event, citing a directive from the Queensland government. The decision has sparked significant debate about freedom of expression for artists and raised questions about the influence of political pressures on the arts sector. The library's statement emphasized that the awards are meant to support First Nations writers based on the literary merit of their work and not personal opinions expressed on social media. However, the spokesperson acknowledged that the media coverage surrounding Wyld's comments overshadowed the awards' intent and the impact on individual artists involved in the program.

Wyld expressed her disappointment and frustration over the cancellation, stating that she would not be silenced by authorities attempting to intimidate artists into conformity over their views. Her fellowship was awarded for a manuscript documenting the experiences of seven generations of stolen Indigenous children, a topic she argues is crucial and should remain separate from her personal opinions on current events. The incident has prompted the library to launch an independent review of all its awards and fellowships, including the David Unaipon award for emerging Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander writers. The Queensland government, represented by Arts Minister John-Paul Langbroek, defended the decision by asserting that it was necessary to uphold community standards and maintain public trust in taxpayer-funded awards. The situation highlights the ongoing tension between artistic expression and political accountability in the realm of public funding for the arts.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article reports on the controversial decision by the State Library of Queensland to withdraw a fellowship award from Indigenous writer Karen Wyld due to her social media comments about the Gaza conflict. This incident raises significant questions about freedom of expression, the role of institutions in moderating public discourse, and the impact of social media on professional recognition.

Institutional Response to Social Media Commentary

The State Library's swift action to rescind Wyld's award highlights a growing trend among institutions to respond to public sentiment on social media. Wyld's comments, which were likely aimed at addressing a sensitive and polarizing issue, led to backlash that prompted the library's decision. This raises concerns about whether institutions are prioritizing public relations over artistic integrity and the freedom of expression of their award recipients.

Impact on Future Awards

The article mentions the suspension of other Indigenous fellowships and awards pending an independent review. This indicates that the library is reevaluating its policies in light of this controversy, which could have a chilling effect on future applicants who may fear similar repercussions for expressing their views on contentious issues. The uncertainty surrounding the David Unaipon award further complicates the situation and casts a shadow over the library's commitment to supporting Indigenous voices.

Public Sentiment and Community Response

Wyld's reaction, where she refuses to be silenced by institutional pressure, resonates with many in the community who value freedom of speech. By labeling the library's actions as an attempt to "bully" voices like hers, she positions herself as a defender of artistic expression, which may garner support from those who are sympathetic to her cause. This incident may also spark broader discussions within Indigenous communities about the implications of institutional power on individual expression.

Potential Manipulation and Media Influence

The article could be viewed as a form of manipulation, as it emphasizes the conflict between artistic expression and institutional governance. The language used suggests a divisive environment where institutions might be prioritizing their image over authentic cultural representation. This framing could influence public perception and lead to increased scrutiny of similar institutions facing backlash over controversial topics.

Credibility and Reliability

While the article presents factual information about the award withdrawal and Wyld's perspective, it also seeks to elicit an emotional response from readers regarding the implications for free speech and artistic integrity. The reliance on direct quotes from Wyld lends credibility, but the overall narrative aims to highlight the tension between individual expression and institutional authority.

This situation is reflective of broader societal debates about the role of social media in shaping public discourse and the responsibilities of institutions to uphold diverse voices. As such, the article serves as a lens through which we can analyze the evolving dynamics of cultural expression in the face of institutional constraints.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The State Library ofQueenslandhas suspended its national Indigenous fellowships and withdrawn the award to one of this year’s recipients over a social media post about Gaza.

The First Nations writer Karen Wyld, who now writes under the name K A Ren Wyld, was stripped of her Creative Australia-funded $15,000 black&write! fellowship, less than five hours before it was to have been awarded to her, over comments she made on social media in October about the conflict in Gaza.

The entire ceremony, due to take place in Brisbane on Tuesday afternoon, was cancelled without notice.

The future of other awards and fellowships is now also under a cloud, including the David Unaipon award for an emerging Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander writer, as the library launches “an independent review of the suite of awards and fellowships we administer”.

A library spokesperson told the Guardian its review would include “all awards and fellowships administered by State Library of Queensland, including the Queensland Literary Awards and the Queensland Memory Awards”.

But the spokesperson denied the David Unaipon award, which is part of the Queensland Literary Awards, had been put on hold.

The black&write! ceremony would be rescheduled for a later date, she said.

Speaking to Guardian Australia, Wyld said she would not be silenced by authorities intent on “bullying nobodies like me” over their stance on the Gaza war.

TheIndigenous Adelaide writerhad been awarded the fellowship for her 110,000-word manuscript documenting seven generations of stolen Indigenous children.

But just after arriving at the State Library of Queensland on Tuesday afternoon she was surprised to receive an email from a News Corp journalist asking for comment on the decision to rescind her fellowship.

Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email

Ten minutes later, she said, she was ushered into a private room, where the library’s chief executive, Vicki McDonald, informed her that the contract for her fellowship, which had previously been signed by the writer and the library’s board, had been cancelled.

“She wouldn’t tell me why or who was doing it … whether it was from the minister or the board [of the library],” Wyld said. “She just said it didn’t come from her.”

Wyld said she told McDonald the withdrawal of the fellowship would add to an increasingly divisive public debate over the right of artists to speak out about Gaza.

McDonald said it had been decided that was a risk worth taking, Wyld claimed.

A spokesperson for McDonald said the decision to rescind Wyld’s fellowship had been “respectfully communicated to the writer at that time”.

When asked if the fellowship had been withdrawn at the request of the Queensland government, the spokesperson said in a statement the decision had been made after the arts minister, John-Paul Langbroek, told parliament he had “taken the decision that this award should not be presented” at the state library.

“Based on that decision, State Library of Queensland yesterday postponed the black&write! ceremony,” the statement said.

A storypublished in The Australianon Tuesday afternoon said the grant had been withdrawn after Langbroek and the Queensland premier, David Crisafulli, wrote to McDonald and the library’s chair, Debbie Best, voicing concerns about social media posts made by Wyld.

Wyld said at their meeting McDonald referred to a tweet Wyld had posted aboutthe death of the Hamas leader Yahya Sinwarin October, which referred to him as a martyr. Wyld deleted the tweet shortly after posting it.

“I probably could have worded it less emotional,” Wyld told the Guardian. “It was mostly me being really devastated at the Albanese government’s approach to the whole [Gaza] situation.”

Wyld said the tweet bore no relevance to her hefty manuscript on the Stolen Generations, funded to the tune of about $40,000 from Creative Australia, for which she was awarded the fellowship.

“I wrote it to highlight that theBringing Them Home reportis 28 years old next week, and only 6% of the recommendations have been actioned,” she said.

“I wrote it to bring awareness to the stories of the Stolen Generations, to propose some positive features, because it ends in the future, and to talk about justice. It has nothing to do with anything else.”

A statement posted on theState Library’s websiteon Tuesday said the black&write! fellowships, “awarded solely on the literary merit of submitted manuscripts”, were designed to encourage and support First Nations writers in fiction and poetry genres and facilitate publication.

“Regrettably, media coverage and commentary today in relation to the personal views of the recommended recipient has overshadowed the intent of the awards,” the statement said.

Sign up toBreaking News Australia

Get the most important news as it breaks

after newsletter promotion

“This has significantly impacted the individual artists and people involved.”

The statement did not name Wyld or state that her fellowship had been withdrawn. The library’s statement said it would undertake an independent review of the awards and fellowships it administered.

“It will have specific focus on how we balance our strong commitment to freedom of expression and our role as a state government funded cultural institution,” the statement said.

Crisafulli’s office did not respond to a request for comment. A spokesperson for Langbroek referred the Guardian to his speech delivered to the legislative assembly on Tuesday, less than two hours before the ceremony was due to begin, confirming the Queensland government had intervened.

Langbroek told parliament it was incumbent on the State Library’s board to ensure that the activities and associations of the library reflected community standards and upheld the integrity of the institution.

“Whilst I support the principles of free expression and creative diversity, any perception that taxpayer-funded awards being granted to individuals who justify terrorism undermines public trust, both in our institutions and in the cultural sector more broadly” Langbroek said.

“Whilst individuals are free to hold and express their views, we must ensure that publicly funded arts programs and venues are held to the highest standards, promoting artistic excellence and fostering social cohesion … Words matter, and that’s why we’ve taken the decision that we have said to this board that this award should not be presented at the State Library.”

The federal arts minister, Tony Burke, said in a statement on Wednesday the decision was a matter for Creative Australia.

“On support for artists, I never interfere with the decisions of Creative Australia,” he said.

“We brought back arm’s-length decision-making in the arts.

“The moment you start [interfering], you become George Brandis,” he said, referring to a previousLiberal government decision on arts fundingthat redirected $104.7m from Creative Australia – then called the Australia Council – to a separate kitty, to be dispensed at the discretion of the then arts minister, Brandis.

However, Creative Australia told the Guardian it was not consulted about the decision to withdraw Wyld’s fellowship.

“Decisions about recipients are made independently by the library,” its statement said.

“Creative Australia provides funding to the State Library of Queensland’s black&write! program, but plays no role in selecting, approving, or rescinding individual fellowships.”

A library spokesperson told the Guardian its review would include “all awards and fellowships administered by State Library of Queensland, including the Queensland Literary Awards and the Queensland Memory Awards”.

But the spokesperson denied the David Unaipon award, which is part of the Queensland Literary Awards, had been put on hold.

The black&write! ceremony would be rescheduled for a later date, she said.

The national black&write! fellowships have furthered the careers of more than a dozen First Nations writers since Creative Australia began funding them in 2014. The fellowships also come with a publishing contract, which this year was to have been signed with University of Queensland Press.

The Guardian has sought comment from UQP.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian