Family of man sent to El Salvador prison looks for any signs he’s still alive: ‘We don’t know anything’

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Family Seeks Information on Deported Brother Imprisoned in El Salvador"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Joregelis Barrios is desperately searching for information about her brother Jerce, who was abruptly deported from the United States to El Salvador and imprisoned in the notorious Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo (Cecot). Jerce, a 36-year-old professional soccer player and father of two, had fled Venezuela seeking asylum due to political violence. His last communication with his family was a brief, distressing phone call during which he expressed concern about his impending transfer. Shortly after, he was forcibly sent to El Salvador, where he was labeled by the Trump administration as a gang member without substantial evidence. Despite his family's efforts to raise awareness of his situation, including murals and protests in his honor, they have received little information regarding his well-being since his deportation. The family remains haunted by the abruptness of his last words, which leave them in a state of uncertainty and fear for his safety.

Jerce's family has been closely monitoring legal challenges against the deportations initiated under the Alien Enemies Act, which have targeted individuals based on dubious accusations. His lawyer, Linette Tobin, has argued that Jerce's tattoos, which include a soccer ball, are not indicative of gang affiliation but rather personal tributes. Despite evidence to support his asylum claim, the legal situation has become increasingly complex, with the U.S. government moving to dismiss his case on the grounds of his deportation. The family is left grappling with the emotional toll of Jerce's absence, especially on his young daughters, who are struggling to understand their father's situation. With no clear path to communicate with him or ensure his safety, the Barrios family remains in a state of anguish, uncertain of Jerce's fate and longing for any signs of his survival.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the distressing situation of Jerce Barrios, a man who was deported from the United States to El Salvador and is now in a notorious prison. His family's anguish and uncertainty about his well-being raise broader questions about immigration policies, human rights, and the treatment of individuals seeking asylum.

Purpose of the Article

The narrative primarily aims to highlight the plight of deported individuals, particularly focusing on the trauma experienced by families left in limbo. By detailing Jerce’s background as a professional soccer player and a father who sought asylum due to political violence in Venezuela, the article seeks to evoke empathy and draw attention to the harsh realities facing immigrants under current U.S. policies. The intention appears to be to rally public sentiment against such immigration practices.

Perception Creation

This story is likely designed to foster a sense of urgency and concern among readers regarding the treatment of immigrants, particularly those escaping violence. It portrays a stark contrast between Jerce's hopeful aspirations for a better life in the U.S. and the grim reality he faced upon deportation. The emotional weight of the family’s narrative serves to create a sympathetic perception of immigrants as victims of systemic failures.

Potential Cover-ups

While the article informs readers about Jerce's situation, it may also divert attention from broader systemic issues related to immigration enforcement, such as the legal processes surrounding deportation and the conditions in detention centers. The focus on individual stories can sometimes obscure the larger political and social contexts that contribute to such personal tragedies.

Manipulative Elements

There are elements in the article that could be seen as manipulative, particularly the use of emotionally charged language and vivid descriptions of Jerce's situation. By emphasizing the family’s fear and uncertainty, the article plays on readers’ emotions. The choice to highlight Jerce's optimistic outlook before his deportation serves to deepen the tragedy of his situation, potentially leading to a more visceral reaction.

Truthfulness of the Article

The article appears to be grounded in factual reporting, citing concrete details about Jerce's deportation and the subsequent lack of communication. However, the emotional framing can influence how this information is perceived, which may lead some readers to question the neutrality of the coverage.

Broader Implications

The implications of this article extend beyond individual stories, touching on societal attitudes towards immigration, asylum seekers, and the political climate surrounding these issues. It could galvanize communities advocating for immigrant rights and prompt discussions about the ethical responsibilities of governments towards those fleeing persecution.

Support from Specific Communities

This narrative is likely to resonate with immigrant advocacy groups, human rights organizations, and communities affected by similar immigration policies. The emphasis on personal stories may attract support from those sympathetic to the causes of asylum seekers and refugees.

Economic and Political Impact

While this article may not directly influence stock markets, it contributes to the ongoing discourse that can affect political policies and public opinion regarding immigration. These factors can indirectly impact sectors that rely on immigrant labor and services related to legal and social support.

Global Power Dynamics

In the context of global power dynamics, the article reflects ongoing tensions related to immigration policies, particularly among countries with differing approaches to asylum seekers. It connects to broader discussions about human rights and the responsibilities of nations to protect vulnerable populations.

Use of AI in Writing

Although it is plausible that AI tools could assist in drafting segments of such articles, the emotional depth and human element suggest a human touch in the storytelling process. AI could have been used to analyze data or pull relevant statistics, but the narrative style aligns more with traditional journalistic practices.

Summary of Trustworthiness

In conclusion, the article presents a compelling narrative that raises important questions about immigration and human rights. Its emotional appeal, while effective in drawing attention, may also lead to a biased interpretation of the broader issues at play. Overall, it remains a credible account of a troubling situation, though readers should approach it with an awareness of the potential for emotional manipulation.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The last time Joregelis Barrios heard from her brother Jerce, the call had lasted just one minute.

Immigration officials had moved Jerce from the detention center in southernCaliforniawhere he had been for six months to another one in Texas. He sounded worried, as if he had been crying. He told his sister he might be transferred somewhere else soon.

No one has heard from him since.

Within hours of that call, Jerce was forced on a plane to El Salvador and booked into the country’s most notorious prison: the Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo (Cecot). He was one of more than 260 men that Donald Trump’s administration had accused of terrorism and gang membership. His sister thought she recognized him in the videos shared by the Salvadorian government, among the crowd of deportees with shaved heads and white prison uniforms, being frogmarched to their cells by guards in ski masks. Then CBS News published a leaked list of the deportees’ names, confirming her worst worries.

“It was a shock,” said Joregelis. “Jerce has always avoided trouble.”

Jerce, a 36-year-old professional soccer player and father of two, had come to the US last year to seek asylum, after fleeing political violence and repression in Venezuela.

An immigration hearing to review his case was scheduled for 17 April, just weeks after he was abruptly exiled toEl Salvador.

“He was so optimistic, up till the last day we spoke,” said Mariyin Araujo, Jerce’s ex-partner and the co-parent of his two daughters, Isabella and six-year-old Carla.

“He believed the laws there in the US were the best, that it would all work out soon,” she said. “How far did that get him?”

Barrios was flown to Cecot on 15 March. For the past two months, his family has been obsessively scanning news updates and social media posts for any sign that he is still alive and healthy. They have been closely monitoring the court cases challenging Trump’s invocation of the wartime powers of theAlien Enemies Actagainst the Venezuela-based gang known asTren de Aragua, to exile immigrants – most of whom have no criminal history – to one of the most notorious prisons in the world. And they have been wondering what, if anything, they can do for Jerce.

In Machiques, a small town near Venezuela’s border with Colombia, locals have painted a mural in Jerce’s honor. His old soccer club, Perijaneros FC, started a campaign demanding his release – and children from the local soccer school held a prayer circle for him. “We have created TikToks about him, we have organized protests, we held vigils,” said Araujo.

“We have looked for so many ways to be his voice at this moment, when he is unable to speak,” she said.

But as the weeks pass, she said, she is increasingly unsure what more she can do. TheTrump administrationhas doubled down on its right to send immigrants to Cecot, despite a federal judge’s order barring it from doing so.

To justify these extraordinary deportations, both Trump and El Salvador’s president, Nayib Bukele, have publicly insisted that the men sent to Cecot are the worst of the worst gang members. To mark Trump’s first 100 days in office, his Department of Homeland Security (DHS) released a list of “Noteworthy individuals deported or prevented from entering the US” – and characterized Jerce as “a member of the vicious Tren de Aragua gang” who “has tattoos that are consistent with those indicating membership” in the gang.

Jerce’s family and lawyer say the only evidence DHS has shared so far is that he has a tattoo on his arm of a soccer ball with a crown on top – a tribute to his favorite soccer team, Real Madrid. His other tattoos include the names of his parents, siblings and daughters.

“My brother is not a criminal,” Joregelis said. “They took him away without any proof. They took him because he’s Venezuelan, because he had tattoos, and because he is Black.”

She’s still haunted by the strange sense of finality in his last call. He had asked after his daughters, and whether his Isabella had been eating well. “I told him she had just had some plátano,” Jorgelis said. “And then he said to me: ‘I love you.’ He said to tell our mom to take care.”

Araujo has struggled to explain to her daughters why their father hasn’t been calling them regularly. She lives in Mexico City with Carla, her six-year-old. Isabella, three, is in Venezuela with Jorgelis.

Carla, especially, has started asking a lot of questions. “Recently, she said to me: ‘Mom, Dad hasn’t called me, Mom. Could it be that he no longer loves me?’” Araujo said. “So I had to tell her a little bit about what had happened.”

Now Carla cries constantly, Araujo said. She misses her father, she misses his scrambled eggs, she misses watching him play soccer. She keeps asking if he is being treated well in detention, if he is eating well. “It’s too difficult,” Araujo said. “From a young age, kids learn that if you do something bad, you go to jail. And now she keeps asking how come her dad is in jail, he’s not a bad person. And I don’t know how to explain. I don’t know how to tell her there is no logical explanation.”

Jerce had been in detention of some sort ever since he set foot inside the US.

Last year, he had used the now defunct CBP One app to request an appointment with immigration officials at the border. After more than four months of waiting in Mexico, agents determined that he had a credible case for asylum – but decided to detain him in a maximum-security detention center in San Ysidro, California, while he awaited his hearing.

“Jerce didn’t tell us much about what it was like there, because he didn’t want us to worry,” said Jorgelis. “The only thing he did say was, why did he have to be Black? I believe he faced a lot of racism there.”

When he first arrived at the border, immigration officials had alleged he might be a gang member based on his tattoos and on social media posts in which he was making the hand gesture commonly used to signify “I love you” in sign language, or “rock and roll”.

His lawyer, Linette Tobin, submitted evidence proving that he had no criminal record in Venezuela, and that his hand gesture was benign. She also obtained a declaration from his tattoo artists affirming that his ink was a tribute to the Spanish soccer team and not to a gang. Officials agreed to move him out of maximum security shortly thereafter, in the fall of last year. “I thought that was a tacit admission, an acknowledgement that he’s not a gang member,” Tobin said.

When officials moved him to a detention center inTexas, Tobin worried that transfer would complicate his asylum proceedings. Since she is based in California, she wasn’t sure whether she’d be able to continue to represent him in Texas.

Jerce had been worried when Tobin last spoke to him on the phone, in March, but she had reassured him that he still had a strong case for asylum. Now, the US government has petitioned to dismiss Jerce’s asylum case, she said, “on the basis that – would you believe it – he’s not here in the US”.

“I mean, he’d love to be here if he could!” she said.

Other than ensuring that his case remains open, Tobin said she’s not sure what more she can do for her client. After the ACLU sued Donald Trump over his unilateral use of the Alien Enemies Act to remove alleged members from the US without legal process, the supreme court ruled that detainees subject to deportation must be given an opportunity to challenge their removals.

But the highest court’s ruling leaves uncertain what people like Jerce, who are already stuck in Salvadorian prison, are supposed to do now. As that case moves forward, Tobin hopes the ACLU will be able to successfully challenge all the deportations.

But in a separate case over the expulsion ofKilmar Ábrego García, whom the administration admitted was sent to Cecot in error, the supreme court asked the administration to facilitate Ábrego García’s return to the US – and the administration said it couldn’t, and wouldn’t.

In his last calls with his family, Jerce told them he’d be out of detention soon – that it would all be better soon. Once he was granted asylum, he said, he would try to join a soccer league in the US and start earning some money. He had promised Carla he’d buy her a TV soon.

Now, Araujo said: “I don’t even know if he is alive. We don’t know anything. The last thing we saw was a video of them, and after that video many speculations, but nothing is certain.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian