Families arrested in LA Ice raids held in basements with little food or water, lawyers say

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Concerns Rise Over Treatment of Families Detained in Recent LA Immigration Raids"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.1
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Recent immigration raids in Los Angeles have raised serious concerns regarding the treatment of detainees, particularly families with young children. According to reports from immigration lawyers, individuals were held in cramped office basements for extended periods without adequate access to food and water. One family, consisting of three young children, was detained for 48 hours after an immigration court hearing, receiving only a bag of chips, animal crackers, and a mini carton of milk during their first day. The conditions were dire, with agents initially denying the family any water and providing only a single bottle for all five members to share on the second day. This lack of basic necessities was compounded by the absence of separate facilities for families, as many detainees were men. Although makeshift tents were eventually set up outside for women and children, these accommodations lacked beds and showers, highlighting the inadequate preparation for the influx of detainees following the raids targeting various businesses and neighborhoods in the area.

As the raids unfolded, federal agents arrested numerous individuals, including those at immigration offices and courthouses, while advocacy groups struggled to access their clients. Lawyers from the Immigrant Defenders Law Center reported being largely blocked from communicating with those detained, raising questions about the treatment and rights of immigrants during these operations. Reports indicate that some individuals were swiftly deported without proper documentation or the opportunity to contest their deportation, while others faced challenges in accessing legal representation. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has faced criticism for its handling of the situation, with claims that facilities were not adequately prepared for the sudden influx of detainees. Additionally, the involvement of Customs and Border Protection officers in the raids has sparked debate about the legality of their presence in Los Angeles, which is significantly more than 100 miles from the U.S.-Mexico border. Legal advocates are working to gather testimonies and understand the rationale behind the arrests, as they express concerns over potential racial profiling and the overall treatment of immigrants during these aggressive enforcement actions.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights the troubling circumstances surrounding the detention of immigrant families in Los Angeles, focusing on the inhumane conditions they faced during their confinement. This coverage serves to draw attention to the treatment of vulnerable populations, particularly in light of recent immigration enforcement actions.

Conditions of Detention

The reported conditions in which families were held—lacking sufficient food, water, and basic amenities—paint a grim picture of the federal government's approach to immigration enforcement. The narrative emphasizes the emotional and physical toll on young children, which is likely intended to evoke a strong emotional response from the public.

Public Perception and Advocacy

By detailing the suffering experienced by these families, the article aims to shape public perception against the current immigration policies. It seeks to mobilize community support for immigrant rights and provoke outrage towards the authorities responsible for the raids. The use of specific examples, such as the inadequate meals provided to children, reinforces the urgency of the issue.

Omission of Broader Context

While focusing on the immediate plight of these families, the article may sidestep larger discussions surrounding immigration policy debates, such as the legal framework supporting these actions or the broader implications of such enforcement on communities. This selective storytelling could lead readers to form a one-dimensional view of the situation.

Trustworthiness of the Report

The reliability of the article hinges on the sources and the veracity of the claims made by the immigration lawyers. The presence of credible organizations like the Immigrant Defenders Law Center lends weight to the reports. However, a lack of official government response or data could leave some questions unanswered.

Potential Impacts on Society and Politics

The emotional narrative presented may galvanize support for immigration reform and influence public opinion. It could prompt protests or advocacy campaigns, potentially leading to policy changes at local or national levels. The reporting also highlights systemic issues within immigration enforcement that could resonate with various activist groups.

Target Audience

This piece appears targeted toward human rights advocates, immigrant communities, and individuals concerned about social justice. It seeks to engage those who may feel compelled to act in response to the injustices faced by detained families.

Market and Economic Implications

While the direct financial implications of such news might be limited, increased public scrutiny of immigration policies could affect businesses operating in immigrant-dense areas. Companies may face pressure to take stances on social issues, impacting their public image and market performance.

Broader Geopolitical Context

The article ties into larger themes of human rights and immigration policy that are prevalent in global discussions. The treatment of immigrants often reflects a country's values and can influence international perceptions of its governance.

Use of AI in Reporting

It is unclear whether AI tools were used in the article's creation. However, if AI were involved, it might have influenced the narrative style or provided data-driven insights that shaped the framing of the story. The choice of language and emphasis on emotional appeals could suggest a tailored approach to engage readers.

In conclusion, the article serves as a poignant critique of immigration enforcement practices, aiming to raise awareness and provoke action among its audience. Its focus on the suffering of families highlights the urgency of reforming policies that affect vulnerable populations.

Unanalyzed Article Content

As federal agents rushed to arrestimmigrantsacross Los Angeles, they confined detainees – including families with small children – in a stuffy office basement for days without sufficient food and water, according to immigration lawyers.

One family with three children were held inside aLos Angeles-area administrative building for 48 hours after being arrested on Thursday immediately after an immigration court hearing, according to lawyers from the Immigrant Defenders Law Center (ImmDef), which is providing non-profit legal services in the region.

The children, the youngest of whom is three years old, were provided a bag of chips, a box of animal crackers and a mini carton of milk as their sole rations for a day. Agents told the family they did not have any water to provide during the family’s first day in detention; on the second day, all five were given a single bottle to share. The one fan in the room was pointed directly towards a guard, rather than towards the families in confinement, they told lawyers.

“Because it was primarily men held in these facilities, they didn’t have separate quarters for families or for women,” said Yliana Johansen-Méndez, chief program officer at ImmDef. Clients explained that “eventually they set up a makeshift tent in an outside area to house the women and children. But clearly, there were no beds, no showers.”

They have since been transferred to a“family detention” centerin Dilley, Texas, a large-scale holding facility retrofitted to hold children with their parents that was reopened under theTrump administration. Lawyers, who had been largely blocked from communicating with immigrants arrested amid theramped-up raids in LA,said family members were able to recount the ordeal only after they were moved out of state.

The harrowing details are the first to emerge about the conditions that people are being held in following the immigration raids targeting LA-area businesses and neighborhoods.

To quell the widespread protests that followed,Donald Trumpsent in military troops despiteopposition from California leaders.The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has said that it arrested 118 immigrants on Friday and over the weekend. Others were arrested at immigration offices and courthouses in the days prior. ImmDef and other local advocacy groups had compiled a separate list of more than 80 people who were apprehended – though many of them still do not appear in the agency’s online databases of detainees.

Many of the people arrested were jailed ad hoc, in LA-area courthouses and administrative offices. Over the past several days, attorneys have taken shifts waiting outside federal immigration offices, attempting to speak to the immigrants, but federal agents and national guard troops have largely blocked lawyers and family members from visiting with those who were arrested, citing safety concerns amid widespread protests in the city. On Tuesday, the immigration court in downtown Los Angles had been shut down – and blocked off.

DHS did not immediately respond to multiple Guardian queries about where it was holding people arrested in LA, and whether local offices had been given instruction to prepare supplies and facilities to hold immigrants prior to the large-scale raids in the region.

Legal aid groups were also largely denied access to immigrants who were transferred to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) processing center and detention center in Adelanto, in the high desert east of LA. “Ice’s excuse was, they’re still processing all the new people,” said Johansen-Méndez. Over the weekend and on Monday, her colleagues were only permitted to visit with a handful of clients at the Adelanto detention center, even though they had called ahead to confirm that at least 40 people referred to the organization had been sent there.

Several people have already been deported. Luis Angel Reyes Savalza, a deportation defense attorney supporting the affected families in LA, said at least one person who was bused to Mexico almost immediately after his arrest was not provided any paperwork or opportunity to contest his deportation. At least two others who were arrested at LA-area carwashes were deported to Tijuana, according to Flor Melendrez, executive director of the Clean Carwash Worker Center.

Another person was told by agents to sign a paper if he wanted to visit an attorney, Johansen-Méndez said – but believes he was tricked into signing some sort of voluntary departure paperwork. “Within hours, he was across the border to Mexico,” she said.

Meanwhile, the family members of workers arrested at a clothing factory in downtown LA, in the parking lot at a Home Depot in the suburb of Paramount, and at a carwash in Culver City were desperately seeking answers about their loved ones’ whereabouts.

Landi, whose husband was arrested on Friday while he worked a shift at the Ambiance Apparel warehouse, said he had reported to work that day as normal. “We never imagined he will be kidnapped by immigration,” she said at a news conference on Monday, outside the business’s gates. The Guardian is not using her surname to protect her family’s privacy and safety.

“The day he was kidnapped, my family went to request information about his abduction, but Ice told us he wasn’t at the center,” she said. “However, after much effort and struggle from our lawyer, Ice simply confirmed that he was there.”

Families were not allowed to bring their loved ones jackets or medications, lawyers said.

Those who were able to confer with attorneys reported that as holding facilities in the city became crowded with immigrants, families were rushed out to detention centers in California’s high desert or in Texas. Agents confiscated belongings and provided little food or water, explaining to immigrants that the facilities had not prepared for the influx of detainees.

Conditions in Adelanto were deteriorating as well, lawyers said. One of ImmDef’s clients reported that meals were provided late, blankets and clothing were scarce, and some people were sleeping on the floor of a day-use recreational room as beds filled up. One client said he witnessed an older man’s health dramatically decline after being denied medication for three days.

On Sunday, Democratic US representatives Gilbert R Cisneros Jr, Judy Chu and Derek Tran said they wereblockedfrom entering Adelanto.

DHS did not respond to a query asking why lawyers and lawmakers have been denied access.

With limited access to immigrants in detention, attorneys are also scrambling to understand the scope of the raids, and the extent to which the Department of Homeland Security has violated immigrants’ rights.

One of the more unusual aspects of the large-scale militarized raids that began last week was that agents from Ice were joined by Customs and Border Protection officers, who are empowered to conduct warrantless stops – but only within 100 miles (160km) of the US border.

Johansen-Méndez believes that the government has justified their presence inLos Angeles– which is more than 100 miles from the US-Mexico border –because the city touches the Pacific Ocean, which the administration could be considering as a “border”.

“They’re counting the entire coastline as a port of entry,” said Johansen-Méndez. “It felt almost like an urban legend that it could be done. But at this point, it’s just they’re everywhere, literally.”

Lawyers from ImmDef and other legal aid and advocacy groups have also been trying to piece together testimonies to better understand how and why immigration agents chose to sweep certain businesses and neighborhoods, and what justifications officers provided when stopping and apprehending people.

“How do they decide who they’re going to ask for their papers and arrest, other than racially profiling?” Johansen-Méndez said. “Did they just ask everyone in the room for their papers or just some people? Did they skip certain people that didn’t fit the profile? We can’t get that information because we can’t talk to everyone.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian