Fake fitness influencers: the secrets and lies behind the world’s most enviable physiques

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"The Impact of Deceptive Practices Among Fitness Influencers on Body Image and Health"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The world of fitness influencers has been marred by deception and the misuse of performance-enhancing drugs, as exemplified by Brian "Liver King" Johnson, who initially attributed his impressive physique to an extreme diet of raw organ meats. Despite his claims, leaked evidence revealed he was spending over $11,000 monthly on anabolic steroids, showcasing the lengths some will go to in order to sell a misleading narrative of fitness success. This trend is not new; historical figures like Hulk Hogan have similarly misled their audiences, creating a cycle of unrealistic expectations surrounding body image and fitness. Today, many influencers share their routines without disclosing the use of steroids or hormones that significantly enhance their results, leading to disillusionment among followers who may feel inadequate despite their own hard work and dedication to fitness. The rise of social media has made it easier for anyone to monetize their physique, often leading to questionable practices that prioritize profit over honesty.

Furthermore, the pressures to maintain a certain image have led to a culture where many influencers feel compelled to hide their use of performance enhancers while promoting an image of being “natural.” The consequences of this are profound, contributing to a significant number of individuals feeling dissatisfied with their bodies. Studies indicate that a substantial percentage of both men and women struggle with body confidence, exacerbated by the unrealistic standards set by influencers. Some influencers, like Janelle Rohner, have begun to acknowledge their use of weight loss drugs, indicating a potential shift towards transparency. However, the industry still struggles with a lack of accountability, as many influencers continue to promote unattainable physiques without admitting their reliance on substances. The solution may lie in encouraging honesty among fitness figures and reframing fitness goals to emphasize overall health and well-being rather than purely aesthetic outcomes, allowing for a more realistic and healthier approach to fitness in society.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the deceptive practices of fitness influencers, particularly focusing on the case of Brian "Liver King" Johnson. It highlights the gap between the image these influencers project and the reality of their physical achievements, which are often aided by performance-enhancing drugs. This analysis delves into the underlying motivations for the article, its societal implications, and the potential manipulation at play.

Intention Behind the Article

The primary aim seems to be exposing the realities behind the seemingly perfect physiques of fitness influencers. By revealing the truth about the use of anabolic steroids and other enhancements, the article seeks to educate readers about the unrealistic expectations set by these figures. It intends to foster a more informed perspective on fitness, thereby discouraging the glorification of unattainable body standards.

Public Perception

The article cultivates a sense of skepticism towards fitness influencers, aiming to shift the narrative from admiration to critical examination. By highlighting the discrepancies between their claims and the truth, it encourages readers to question the authenticity of what they see online. This could lead to a broader dialogue about the ethics of promoting such misleading representations of health and fitness.

Information Concealment

While the article doesn’t explicitly claim to hide information, it might be inferred that it seeks to redirect attention from the broader cultural issues, such as societal pressures to achieve certain body types, and the role of the fitness industry in perpetuating these ideals. By focusing on individual influencers, it could inadvertently minimize the systemic issues at play.

Manipulation Assessment

The article can be considered somewhat manipulative as it uses sensational language and stark imagery to create a vivid picture of the issues at hand. The portrayal of the “Liver King” as an exaggerated figure serves to evoke a strong emotional reaction from readers, possibly overshadowing more nuanced discussions about fitness culture and individual responsibility.

Truthfulness of the Report

The article appears to be based on factual revelations, particularly concerning the disclosure of steroid use by known influencers. However, the sensationalist tone may impact how the information is received, raising questions about the balance between delivering hard truths and maintaining journalistic integrity.

Societal Implications

The discussion surrounding unrealistic body standards may resonate strongly in today’s society, particularly among younger demographics who are increasingly influenced by social media. This could lead to heightened awareness and potential shifts in consumer behavior, as people seek authenticity in fitness marketing.

Target Audience

The article likely appeals to health-conscious individuals, fitness enthusiasts, and those critical of influencer culture. It seeks to engage readers who are disillusioned with the fitness industry and are looking for more authentic narratives about health and wellness.

Economic Impact

While the article may not have a direct impact on stock markets, it could influence the fitness and supplement industries as consumer trust in influencers diminishes. Companies associated with these influencers might face backlash, affecting their market performance and stock value.

Global Context

In a broader sense, the article touches on issues of trust and authenticity, which are relevant to many industries beyond fitness. As societies grapple with misinformation and the impact of social media, the themes presented here could resonate across various sectors.

AI in Writing

It’s possible that AI tools were employed in drafting the article, especially in terms of structuring the content and enhancing its readability. However, the emotional and critical tone suggests a human touch in the editorial process, likely aimed at engaging the audience effectively.

Manipulative Language

The article employs a critical tone and strong imagery to drive its points home. This choice of language may be seen as manipulative, as it evokes strong reactions and could polarize opinions on fitness influencers.

Considering the analysis, the article provides valuable insights into the fitness influencer culture while employing a critical lens that encourages readers to reassess their perceptions of health and fitness representations. However, its sensationalist approach may impact its overall credibility.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Looking back to 2022, it seems impossible that anyone ever believed that Brian “Liver King” Johnson achieved his physique without pharmaceutical assistance. He looks like a hot water bottle stuffed with bowling balls, an 80s action figure with more veins – an improbably muscular man who put his bodybuilder-shaming physique down to a diet of “raw liver, raw bone marrow and raw testicles”. And that last part, really, was the trick: by crediting his results to a regime that nobody else would dare try, he gave them a faint veneer of plausibilty.Maybe, if you followed a less extreme version of his protocol, you could get comparable (though less extreme) results. And if you couldn’t stomach an all-organ diet, well, you could always get the same nutrients from his line of supplements.

The Liver King, of course, was dethroned – leaked emails revealed that he was spending more than $11,000 a month on muscle-building anabolic steroids,as detailed in a new Netflix documentary. But the story of a charismatic person promising ridiculous results is just the most outrageous example of a phenomenon that’s been around ever since performance enhancers were invented. In the 1980s, Hulk Hogan urged a generation to say their prayers and eat their vitamins in his VHS workout set; then in 1994 he was forced toadmit to more than a decade of steroiduse during a court case against his former boss, Vince McMahon. In 2025, influencers post their morning ice baths and deep breathing exercises, but don’t mention what they’re injecting at the same time, whether that’s steroids intended to encourage muscle growth in the same way that testosterone does, or testosterone itself, or human growth hormone (HGH). As a result, a generation of young men and women – and, to be fair, plenty of middle-aged ones – are developing a completely skewed version of what’s possible with hard work and a chicken-heavy diet. And things might be getting worse, not better.

It’s never been easier to start a business based on your body. With a couple of hundred thousand followers and a decent angle, it only takes a couple of days to whip up an ebook, online course or meal plan. Apps make it easy to start group coaching or habit-tracking services, and even supplement companies are easy to start, if you’re happy to just stick your own label on tubs of protein powder.

“In the current economic climate, the fitness industry is a very appealing place,” says James Smith, a personal trainer, fitness influencer and bestselling author who has been open about using steroids in his early 20s (he’s now 35). “If you’ve got decent genetics, you’re a decent coach and have a grasp of marketing, you can unlock a very good income selling workouts and training plans. So maybe you take a little bit of testosterone to get a little leg up, and suddenly you’re getting compliments at the gym and posting record lifts on Instagram. Surely a bit of human growth hormone couldn’t hurt? OK, business is now at an all-time high; followers are coming up to you and asking about reps and sets. You’ve dug yourself a hole that is hard to get out of. What do you do now? Tell your audience you’re on steroids?”

If you did, you’d be in a very small minority. There are – at a conservative estimate – tens of thousands of fitness influencers globally, and only a small handful have openly admitted to using steroids, even among those posting the most outlandish results.Larry Wheels, an influencer and powerlifter, talked about the muscle cramps, depression, lethargy, loss of appetite and low libido he suffered from steroid abuse in a2018 video. He then announced he was no longer taking them in 2022, followed by a relapse in 2024. Sam Sulek, one of the current kings of fitness on YouTube thanks to his combination of chatty, informal videos and unbelievable physical dimensions, hasn’t elaborated, but in a video last year he did tell fans he’d be unable to reach his goal weight of 300lb “natural”. Rich Piana, famed for inventing an arms workout taking eighthours, was open about his steroid use for much of his career, discussing his own “cycle” and giving out advice for other users on social media. He died in 2017, aged 46, and with a heart weighing twice the normal amount for an adult male.

But while a high-profile handful of people decide to open up, most other influencers continue to maintain that they’re “natural” or just avoid the subject entirely. A few even take tests to “prove” they’re clean, ignoring the fact that tests are easy to cheat: most steroids are undetectable after a weightlifter cycles off them for a month or so, while their effects can linger in the body for ever. And, make no mistake, the effects of enhancement can be huge: in one study, a group of men who took 600mg of testosterone enanthate for 10 weeks and did no exercise sawgreater gainsin strength than a placebo group who took nothing and worked out normally.

“In my first cycle of testosterone in my early 20s, I climbed the status hierarchy in 12 weeks,” says Smith. “I didn’t use steroids to benefit my business, but I completely understand why people do it. It sounds bad to say, but if you want to ever make a living from fitness, you’re almost stupid for even trying to do it naturally.”

Meanwhile, it’s not just influencers getting bigger who might be misrepresenting how they achieve their unbelievable results. In April this year, Peloton instructor Janelle Rohner agreed to refund followers who bought her course on food macros, after admitting to using GLP-1 weight loss drugs. “I could have kept this a secret,” shesaid in a TikTok videoposted after the subsequent backlash. “I could have gone on and on for years and not told, but I don’t want to do that. I don’t want to be that person.” The implication, of course, is that plenty of peopleareprepared to be that person, and it’s hard to argue. In the years since Wegovy and similar drugs have been approved for weight loss, plenty of influencers have undergone near-miraculous transformations, most of them citing clean eating when it’s possible they’re doing the exact opposite. At the same time, some influencers are taking a far more dangerous route than pills or chemicals – injecting synthol, an oil used to bulk up their muscles, or havinghigh-risk“Brazilian butt lifts” to compensate for bodies that won’t change naturally.

How much of any of this is a problem if you, personally, are blissfully unaffected by everyLove Islandcontestant, #NoExcuses Insta-reel and celebrity success story? The answer, on a societal level, might be: quite a lot. In a2022 survey from social enterprise Better, 23% of men and 42% of women reported that they “rarely” or “never” feel body confident. In a small-scale studyfrom 2024, participants who were active social media users, frequently liking and commenting on content, were less satisfied with their bodies and had an increased level of negative feelings about their appearance. For anyone who takes online influencers at their word, training can feel dispiriting and hopeless: even working out multiple times a day and eating perfectly, it can be impossible to reach the same levels of fat-free muscle as your Instagram feed will show you after 20 seconds of scrolling. And, of course, film stars male and female are hardly helping the situation by showing up more lean and muscular than they’ve ever been in their 40s or 50s, preaching the virtues of twice-a-day training and drinking lots of water.

“It’s quite clear there’s been an uptick in this stuff,” says Dan Roberts, a personal trainer who works with actors and Broadway stars. “It takes time to build muscle, so when you suddenly build a lot of it, that’s not possible without extra testosterone in your system, or growth hormone, or something. Also, sometimes the signs are just really obvious … when someone’s neck thickens up suddenly …”

Some fitness enthusiasts, meanwhile, are fighting back. In Reddit’s “natty or juice” community, members debate whether celebrities and influencer physiques are achievable naturally, or if their results show signs of substance abuse: a distended stomach (sometimes known as “roid gut”) can be a sign of excess growth hormone, while gynecomastia (an increase of breast gland tissue in men) is typically caused by an imbalance in hormone levels. On YouTube, bodybuilders and coaches such as Greg Doucette, Dr Mike Israetel and Derek Munro (whose channel, More Plates More Dates, exposed the Liver King) explain what actually goes into a serious steroid regime, as well as the disastrous possible side-effects. But even with millions of viewers well versed in the minutiae of Winstrol or the signs of an HGH habit (it’s all in the jaw), millions more hang on to the hope that the right protein powder or workout regime might be enough, and end up hopelessly disappointed.

So what’s the solution? A good start would be for the most high-profile influencers and celebrities to be honest about what they’re usingandthe risks they’re accepting to do it. “Look at testosterone,” says Smith, whoposted a videoabout his own regime earlier this year. “It’s cheap, easily accessible, well tolerated and arguably less dangerous than a lot of other things young people do. There are multiple implications for using it over the long term, problems with use versus abuse, fertility and many other psychological implications and impacts to using it, but it’s absolutely becoming more common. I look better with my shirt off at 35 than 25 because I now use a TRT [testosterone replacement therapy] service.”

We could also reframe what we’re looking to get out of exercise, from an enviable physique to a better quality of life. “When it comes to our health, there are so many actually proven things we can do to live longer, be happier, fitter, stronger,” says Roberts. “The good information is out there – we just have to look for it through all the noise and nonsense.”

We should also probably ignore the people who have lied to us in the past. The Liver King has now, in a way, come clean: after claiming to go “natty” for 60 days in an Instagram post, he admitted to being back on steroidsin late 2023(although he is still preaching the value of his “nine ancestral tenets”, which include sleep, sun exposure and cold therapy, and which the Netflix documentary claims were made up in conjunction with his marketing agency).

“I think he thought the broader message was more important than the steroids,” says Ben Johnson, former CEO of the Liver King’s holding company, Tip of the Spear, who seems genuinely shocked that his former associate was doing anything untoward. “It’s unfortunate that the messenger has killed the message … when there’s a kernel of truth at the centre of the message, it’s easy to focus on that and ignore the other variables.” What isn’t quite so easy is looking past the abs and the arms, and finding people who value health and wellbeing over aesthetics and false promises. But as anyone who’s put in the work knows, sometimes the hard path is the one that pays off.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian