Exodus review – broadside against Erdoğan’s Turkey takes the multi-narrative, multi-character route

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Film 'Exodus' Critiques Authoritarianism in Erdoğan's Turkey Through Fragmented Narrative"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The film 'Exodus' serves as a pointed critique of the authoritarian tendencies present in Erdoğan's Turkey, addressing the impact of such governance on various societal sectors including education, policing, freedom of expression, and the treatment of minorities. Directed by Serkan Nihat, the film takes a fragmented narrative approach that is reminiscent of early 2000s ensemble films, such as '21 Grams' and 'Babel'. It follows academic Hakan, who becomes a fugitive after his pro-democracy lecture is disrupted by government agents. Hakan's journey intertwines with that of his former bully turned cop, Yilmaz, and another policeman, Mehmet, who grapples with his conscience regarding the political nature of his work. The story not only illustrates the direct consequences of Erdoğan's regime but also touches on the broader theme of forced migration, as the characters find themselves in a safehouse with migrants attempting to escape to Greece.

While 'Exodus' aims to highlight the extensive damage caused by the current political climate in Turkey, its execution leaves much to be desired. The film's ambition to cover multiple narratives results in characters that often feel more like representations of societal issues than fully developed individuals. This lack of depth is exacerbated by the film's production choices, which depict a supposed migrant safehouse in a manner that appears more stylized than realistic, detracting from the authenticity of the portrayed experiences. As a result, despite the film's well-intentioned messages, it struggles to resonate on a deeper emotional level with its audience. 'Exodus' is currently available on various digital platforms, offering viewers a glimpse into the complex realities of modern Turkey, albeit through a lens that some may find overly polished and detached from the actual struggles faced by individuals in such dire circumstances.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The cinematic response to populism and incipient fascism worldwide over the last decade hasn’t fully mobilised – but this broadside on the authoritarian leanings of Erdoğan’sTurkeydoesn’t pull its punches. (Unsurprisingly, it’s produced by a UK-based team.) It’s a shame then that, lambasting the effects on education, policing, freedom of expression and the demonisation of minorities, director Serkan Nihat is wedded to a hectoring, didactic method that dulls the audience’s engagement, instead of firing us up.

Nihat opts for the fragmented, multi-character narrative beloved of big-picture global film-makers in the 00s (think 21 Grams or Babel). Academic Hakan (Denis Ostier) becomes a fugitive after his pro-democracy lecture is invaded by regime goons. Hakan is later assaulted by vengeful cop Yilmaz (Murat Zeynilli), his one-time school bully, and then hooks up with another policeman, Mehmet (Umit Ulgen), also on the lam after a crisis of conscience about the politicisation of his work. The pair hole up in a safehouse full of migrants being chivvied to Greece by people-smuggler Sahab (Doga Celik). Meanwhile, Hakan and Mehmet’s wives find themselves targeted by the security forces in a clampdown.

This carousel of woe certainly conveys the scale of the damage inflicted by Erdoğan. But by dovetailing both the civil society elements with the forced migration narrative that is arguably a secondary consequence, Exodus bites off more than it can chew. The haste to make big statements on every front makes the characters more representative than actually alive. And even the film’s glossy production values work against it: the supposedly grimy migrant bolthole, backlit with billowing drapes, is more akin to the foyer of a distressed-decor boutique hotel, and it is filled with Kurds and Yazidis who look more like models than refugees. For all the real-world talk, Nihat’s approach feels removed from reality.Exodus is on digital platforms now.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian