‘Everything is opportunistic’: how will Iran war affect Netanyahu’s polling?

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Netanyahu's Leadership Tested Amid Iran Conflict and Domestic Polarization"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently expressed optimism regarding the potential for peace following the country's military operations against Iran. In a pre-recorded statement, he highlighted the success of the operation as a pivotal opportunity for expanding peace agreements, a sentiment that resonated with his supporters. However, critics, including political analysts, have characterized Netanyahu's approach as inherently opportunistic, suggesting that he seeks to leverage every situation for political gain without taking responsibility for past failures. This perspective reflects a broader skepticism about his leadership, especially in the wake of the October 7 Hamas attack, which was one of the worst security breaches in Israel's history and occurred under his watch. The political landscape in Israel remains deeply polarized, with Netanyahu's coalition government facing significant challenges and public divisions intensifying as the conflict in Gaza continues to unfold.

As the dust settles from the military engagement, the question of Netanyahu's political future looms large. Although recent polls indicate a slight uptick in support for Netanyahu's Likud party, analysts caution that these gains may not translate into a decisive electoral advantage, particularly given the ongoing corruption allegations against him and the rising cost of living. Political observers note that while Netanyahu's supporters may rally around him due to the perceived success against Iran, the public has not forgotten the catastrophic events of October 7. His ability to navigate these complex political waters is under scrutiny, especially as opposition parties express renewed hope based on polling data. Ultimately, the dynamics within Netanyahu's coalition and the broader Israeli political scene suggest that while he may have temporarily bolstered his position, the underlying issues that have historically fueled division and dissent remain unresolved, leaving his long-term prospects uncertain.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

WhenBenjamin Netanyahudescribed the opportunities for peace that Israel’s successes in its brief war with Iran might bring, supporters took him at his word.

“This victory presents an opportunity for a dramatic widening of peace agreements. We are working on this with enthusiasm,” Israel’s longest-serving prime ministersaid on Thursday in a pre-recorded statement.

Critics of the 75-year-old leader saw something else.

“Whatever he does, he tries to turn everything to his advantage … This is a guy who never takes responsibility but only credit … Everything is opportunistic and everything is transactional,” said Prof Yossi Mekelberg at Chatham House in London.

Quite how long Netanyahu will stay in power is now a burning question inIsrael, as the country recovers from the rollercoaster of fear and elation of the last weeks.

With the Iran war apparently over, the conflict in Gaza has returned to the headlines. On the day after the US declared a ceasefire,seven Israeli soldiers diedin an attack on an outdated armoured vehicle in the south of the devastated territory, prompting further urgent calls within Israel for the hostilities there to be brought to a close.

Back in the headlines, too, are the deep divisions in Israeli society and within the coalition Netanyahu put together after elections in November 2022. This is themost rightwing governmentever seen in Israel, and has survived multiple challenges since the 7 October 2023 Hamas raid into Israel, in which militants killed 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took another 251 hostage.

For Prof Tamar Hermann, a specialist in public opinion at theIsrael Democracy Institute, the war has changed little in terms of Israel’s polarised domestic politics.

“Netanyahu’s supporters support him even more and opponents oppose him like before. They see the [war against Iran] as very successful but don’t credit Netanyahu. He gets some points … but not so many,” Hermann said.

Netanyahu loyalists hope for a major boost in the polls.

Udi Tenne, a strategic adviser and campaign manager for ministers in the current government, said: “The operation [against Iran] led by Prime Minister Netanyahu was unquestionably justified, but it also, undeniably, benefited him politically. To put it metaphorically, the missiles launched at Iran also landed on the Israeli opposition.”

A key question is whether the perceived victory over Iran will convince enough voters to forget thatthe 2023 attack– Israel’s worst ever security failure – not only occurred on Netanyahu’s watch but can be attributed in part to policies he had pursued over a decade or more.

“Since that horrific day, Israel’s security situation has dramatically improved: the Iranian threat has been neutralised, Syria has collapsed, [the Lebanese militant group] Hezbollah has been severely damaged, and Gaza lies dismantled. We are living through a profound security transformation – and for that, great credit is due to the IDF [Israel Defense Forces] and to the government,” said Tenne.

Others are less convinced, andrecent pollsare inconclusive. The relatively minor gains made by Netanyahu’s ruling Likud party have largely been at the expense of other coalition parties, notably the far right, and would not necessarily guarantee a win at any election.

And a requirement for a 90-day gap between a dissolution of parliament and new elections means a snap poll would be a big risk for Netanyahu, even if his personal ratings have risen.

“People are going to give Netanyahu a lot of credit for the operation against Iran and polls show this. But they haven’t forgotten [the 7 October attack] and politics have not become less divisive,” said Lahav Harkov, a senior political correspondent at the US-based Jewish Insider.

Netanyahu’s tactical instincts have never been in doubt throughout his long and controversial career. They are still admired by his supporters and bitterly regretted by detractors. “One of his greatest political talents is he knows how to delay and come up with temporary workarounds so he can live another day,” said Harkov.

Advisers to leaders of Israel’s opposition parties said last week they were encouraged by recent polls and believed that the many other issues that have riled voters – persistent corruption allegations, Netanyahu’s ongoing graft trial, a bitter row over whether Orthodox Jews should be exemption from conscription and the rising cost of living – will come to the fore as new elections loom.

Others point out that Netanyahu’s political base is far from monolithic, and that his comments about thecost to his familyof the recent conflict have provoked much anger.

Netanyahu’s political demise has been often predicted, most recently in October 2023. However, he has not only retained power but consistently outmanoeuvred rivals and opponents. A bid to bring down his government was only narrowly defeated a day before he launched Israel’s warplanes against Iran.

“He desperately needed some success. I don’t think it was a coincidence that it happened as he was being cross-examined in his corruption trial,” said Mekelberg.

Loyalists have no doubt who will be in charge in the coming years. “He has returned to power with a firm grip,” said Tenne. “If David Ben-Gurion declared Israel’s independence, then it is Benjamin Netanyahu who is now securing its future.”

Netanyahu appears convinced, too. With only weeks of the parliamentary term to go before a three-month summer recess, he has at least bought himself time until the late autumn.

“I have many more objectives, and as long as I believe I can fulfilthem, I will,”he saidlast week.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian