Ethical super fund says QBE ‘not joining the dots’ between fossil fuel projects and rising premiums

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Ethical Super Fund Urges QBE to Reform Fossil Fuel Underwriting Policies Amid Rising Insurance Costs"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.1
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

An ethical super fund, Australian Ethical, is calling for significant changes to QBE's insurance policies as criticism mounts over the company's ability to underwrite fossil fuel projects without restrictions while simultaneously attributing rising premiums to climate change. The call for reform comes just ahead of QBE's annual general meeting in Sydney, highlighting a growing concern as insurance premiums have surged, making coverage unaffordable for many households. Particularly affected are homes located in flood and fire-prone regions, where rising costs have led to some properties becoming uninsurable. Amanda Richman from Australian Ethical criticized QBE for allowing the underwriting of new oil and gas projects with minimal oversight, extending to at least 2030 and in some cases to 2040. This approach, she argues, makes QBE an outlier among its peers, who are increasingly recognizing the linkage between fossil fuel investments and the escalating risks of climate change. Richman expressed skepticism regarding QBE's engagement with fossil fuel clients, suggesting that it serves more as a data collection effort than a genuine accountability measure.

As insurance costs continue to rise, driven by extreme weather events, inflation, and increasing home values in high-risk areas, QBE has acknowledged climate change as a significant risk in its annual report. Despite this recognition, the company’s policies still allow for the development of new fossil fuel reserves, which contradicts the broader goals of the Paris Agreement. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has warned that emissions from existing fossil fuel infrastructure alone could surpass global climate targets. There is also political momentum for change, with recommendations for the government to impose a levy on coal and gas extraction to fund disaster mitigation and help offset rising insurance costs. As the pressure mounts on QBE and other insurers to align their practices with climate goals, the upcoming AGM may serve as a pivotal moment for shareholders and stakeholders advocating for a more sustainable approach to underwriting practices and climate risk management.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights the tension between an ethical super fund and QBE Insurance regarding the insurer's policies on underwriting fossil fuel projects. It raises significant concerns about the impact of these policies on insurance premiums and climate change, suggesting that QBE is not adequately addressing the connection between its support for fossil fuel projects and the rising risks associated with climate-related disasters.

Critique of QBE's Policies

The criticism from Australian Ethical, represented by Amanda Richman, underscores a growing frustration with QBE's approach to underwriting fossil fuel projects without restrictions. This position is seen as inconsistent with the rising costs of insurance premiums driven by climate change, particularly in areas prone to natural disasters. By allowing these projects to continue unabated, QBE is accused of ignoring the long-term implications of climate risk, which directly affects the affordability and accessibility of insurance for households.

Implications for the Insurance Market

The rising premiums and the increasing number of homes being deemed uninsurable illustrate a troubling trend in the insurance market, particularly in Australia. This situation not only impacts individuals and families but also poses broader questions about the sustainability of the insurance industry itself. The financial strain on households could lead to a significant shift in the market, as more people may be forced to forgo essential coverage due to rising costs.

Community Response and Investor Pressure

The article suggests that there is potential for community and investor pressure to influence QBE's policies. While Australian Ethical, holding $56 million in QBE shares, has raised these issues, the absence of specific resolutions at the upcoming AGM indicates a cautious approach. This scenario highlights the delicate balance between ethical investment practices and the financial realities of large insurance providers.

Broader Economic and Political Context

The discussion around QBE's policies is situated within a larger context of climate change and economic pressures on households. As extreme weather events become more frequent, the insurance industry's response will be critical in shaping public sentiment and government policy regarding climate action. The article reflects a growing awareness among investors and the public about the interconnectedness of fossil fuel investments and climate risk management.

Potential Market Impact

This article could have significant implications for the stock market, particularly for QBE and other insurance companies. Investors may reassess their positions based on the ethical considerations raised, potentially influencing stock prices and investor confidence. The insurance sector may face increased scrutiny, leading to a reevaluation of underwriting practices related to fossil fuels.

The article does not suggest an explicit manipulation but rather a call for accountability from QBE. The language used highlights the urgency of the situation, aiming to raise awareness about the risks associated with fossil fuel underwriting in the context of climate change. Overall, the article appears to present a legitimate concern rather than a manipulative narrative.

In conclusion, the article is a credible critique of QBE's practices, emphasizing the importance of aligning insurance policies with the realities of climate change. It aims to foster discussion about the ethical responsibilities of insurers in the face of rising climate risks.

Unanalyzed Article Content

An ethical super fund is pushing for QBE to overhaul its coverage policies amid criticism the insurer can underwrite fossil fuel projects without restriction while blaming the climate crisis for steep premium rises.

The critique comes ahead of QBE’s annual general meeting in Sydney on Friday, and against a backdrop of rapidly rising premiums that has priced some households out of insurance coverage altogether.

Homes in flood and fire-prone areas have been subject tohuge insurance cost increases, and in some cases homes have been deemed uninsurable, as climate-driven disasters hit more frequently and with greater intensity.

Australian Ethical’s Amanda Richman said QBE’s policies allow it to underwrite new oil and gas projects without any restrictions to at least 2030, and in some cases out to 2040, making it an outlier among insurers.

Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton’s Clear Air column as a free newsletter

She said while QBE says it engages with its fossil fuel clients, the approach appears to be “little more than a data collection exercise that serves to delay accountability”.

“We’re not seeing any suggestion that QBE is prepared to escalate where there is a lack of progress,” Richman said.

She said the Australian-based global insurer “was not joining the dots” between support for fossil fuel projects and the need to reduce climate risks.

Australian Ethical held $56m worth of QBE shares at the end of January.

There are no resolutions listed at QBE’s upcoming AGM specifically targeting the insurer’s underwriting policies. Fund managers often publicly raise such issues to gauge support from other investors, before taking more forceful action such as seeking the removal of directors, or voting down remuneration arrangements.

Insurance premiums for numerous categories, including house, home contents and motor vehicle insurance, have rocketed in recent years with near annual double-digit increases, pressuring households and fuelling inflation.

Insurers have blamed extreme weather events, increasing home values in high-risk areas, high inflation and rising reinsurance premiums for some of the steep increases.

Sign up toBreaking News Australia

Get the most important news as it breaks

after newsletter promotion

A QBE spokesperson said the insurer regularly assesses a range of material risks, including global heating.

“Our approach to addressing key environmental and social risks across our underwriting and investments activities is set out in our environmental and social risk framework,” the spokesperson said.

“Engagement remains a key component of our climate strategy as we seek to understand our stakeholders, and we continue to support their transition through existing products and services and offering new ones.”

QBE said in its annual report that climate change is one of its top risks.

While a growing number of insurers, lenders and coal, oil and gas companies state their support for the landmark 2015 Paris agreement, many policies allow for the development of new fossil fuel reserves.

According to Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change analysis,greenhouse gas emissions from existing fossil fuel infrastructureare more than enough to push the world beyond its climate goals.

To improve the chances of limiting global warming to 1.5C above preindustrial times, emissions need to be reduced by 45% by 2030 and reach net zero by 2050.

A parliamentary committeerecommended last yearthat the government create a levy on coal and gas extraction to be invested in disaster mitigation and used to offset the cost of rising insurance.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian