Endangered sharks being killed at alarming levels in Pacific, Greenpeace claims, after cutting 20km of vessel’s longline

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Greenpeace Reports Alarming Shark Kill Rates Amid Industrial Fishing in the Pacific"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.1
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Greenpeace has raised alarms regarding the alarming level of endangered shark killings in the Pacific, attributing this crisis to industrial fishing practices that threaten marine biodiversity. This concern was highlighted after Greenpeace activists disrupted a Spanish fishing vessel, Playa Zahara, which was operating in the South Fiji Basin north of New Zealand. During their intervention aboard the Rainbow Warrior, the activists reported witnessing the vessel haul in three endangered mako sharks within just half an hour. In a concerted effort to mitigate the situation, the activists managed to free 14 marine animals caught on the vessel's longline, including eight near-threatened blue sharks and four swordfish, alongside the endangered longfin mako shark. Furthermore, they successfully removed over 210 hooks and 20 kilometers of longline from the water, underscoring the urgency of addressing this environmental issue. Georgia Whitaker, a senior campaigner with Greenpeace Australia Pacific, expressed her distress at witnessing the suffering of these creatures, highlighting the brutal conditions they endure due to fishing practices.

The fishing company, Viverdreams Fish, which owns the Playa Zahara, defended its operations by stating that they were adhering to international laws regarding fishing quotas and sustainability. Patricia Rodríguez, a spokesperson for the company, claimed that the species captured were within the limits set by regulatory authorities and accused Greenpeace of disseminating disinformation. Meanwhile, a Greenpeace analysis revealed that nearly half a million blue sharks were caught as bycatch in the Pacific Ocean last year, marking a significant increase in shark mortality rates. This trend poses a grave threat to marine ecosystems, as highlighted by Dr. Leonardo Guida from the Australian Marine Conservation Society, who emphasized that one-third of shark and ray species are currently facing extinction. The upcoming UN ocean conference in Nice will address the high seas biodiversity treaty, which Australia has signed but has yet to ratify. Greenpeace is advocating for swift action from the Australian government to ratify this treaty to enhance protection for marine life and ensure sustainable fishing practices going forward.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights a concerning issue regarding the increasing killing of endangered sharks in the Pacific, drawing attention to the detrimental impact of industrial fishing on marine biodiversity. The involvement of Greenpeace activists, who intervened in a fishing operation, serves as a focal point for the narrative, emphasizing the urgency of the situation.

Purpose Behind the Publication

The primary aim of this news piece appears to be raising awareness about the plight of endangered shark species and the threats posed by industrial fishing practices. By showcasing the direct actions of Greenpeace, the article seeks to mobilize public sentiment against practices perceived as harmful to marine life. This aligns with broader environmental advocacy efforts aimed at promoting sustainable fishing and marine conservation.

Public Perception Targeted

The article is likely targeting environmentally conscious readers, aiming to evoke a sense of urgency and emotional response regarding the fate of sharks and marine ecosystems. By detailing the distressing imagery of sharks being caught and injured, it seeks to create a narrative that compels the audience to support conservation efforts. There is a clear intention to foster a negative perception of the fishing practices described while encouraging public discourse on marine life protection.

Potential Concealments or Omissions

While the article brings to light the actions of the Playa Zahara, it also presents the company's defense that its operations are legal and within quotas. Therefore, there may be an oversight in discussing the broader context of fishing regulations and the complexities of international law on marine conservation. This could lead readers to form opinions without a full understanding of the legal frameworks involved.

Manipulative Elements in the Article

The narrative employs emotionally charged language and vivid descriptions of the sharks’ suffering. This approach may enhance the manipulative aspect of the article by prioritizing emotional engagement over a balanced presentation of facts. The potential for bias arises from the focus on Greenpeace's perspective without adequate counterarguments from the fishing company, which could provide a more nuanced view of the issue.

Truthfulness of the Content

The article appears to be based on factual events, including Greenpeace's intervention and the fishing operation's details. However, the portrayal of the situation may carry an inherent bias aimed at galvanizing public opinion against industrial fishing practices. Therefore, while the underlying facts may be accurate, the interpretation and emphasis can skew perceptions.

Societal and Economic Implications

This news could influence public opinion, potentially leading to increased pressure on policymakers to enforce stricter regulations on fishing practices. A growing awareness of endangered species may spur actions that impact the fishing industry and related economies. If the public sentiment shifts significantly, it could result in changes to fishing quotas or even broader campaigns against certain fishing practices.

Target Audience and Community Support

The article likely resonates more with environmental activists, conservationists, and individuals concerned about marine life. It aims to galvanize support from communities that prioritize ecological sustainability, appealing to those who are already predisposed to environmental advocacy.

Market Impact Considerations

The implications of this news might extend to companies involved in fishing or marine products. Negative public perception can influence stock prices, particularly for companies like Viverdreams Fish, which could face backlash if associated with harmful practices. Investors in these sectors may react to changing consumer sentiments regarding sustainability.

Global Power Dynamics and Relevance

While the article primarily focuses on environmental issues, it touches on broader concerns regarding the sustainability of marine resources, which are vital for global food security. As such, it connects to ongoing discussions about resource management and international environmental agreements.

Artificial Intelligence Influence

It is conceivable that AI tools were employed in the drafting or editing process to enhance clarity or engagement, though there is no direct evidence in the article's content. If AI were involved, it might have contributed to the emotive language or the structure of arguments presented, steering the narrative toward a more impactful delivery.

In conclusion, the article serves as a call to action for environmental awareness while potentially framing the fishing industry's practices in a negative light. The balance between factual reporting and emotional engagement raises questions about bias, which influences the overall credibility of the message conveyed.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Endangered sharks are being killed at alarming levels in the Pacific and industrial fishing is putting marine biodiversity at increasing risk,Greenpeacehas claimed, after its activists disrupted a Spanish vessel operating north of New Zealand.

The campaign group said activists on the Rainbow Warrior this week observed a longline fishing operation by the Playa Zahara in the South Fiji Basin.

Georgia Whitaker, a senior campaigner with Greenpeace Australia Pacific, was on board during the operation. She claimed the activists watched as the vessel hauled in and killed three endangered mako sharks in half an hour.

She said a small crew, including a trained shark handler, boarded a support boat to approach the Spanish vessel and released 14 animals caught on its line – among them eight near-threatened blue sharks, four swordfish and an endangered longfin mako shark.

The activists also removed more than 210 hooks and 20km of longline.

“It was devastating seeing these beautiful creatures being caught, often on their gills, in their mouth, by huge baited hooks,” Whitaker said. “They were fighting for their lives and then minutes later you’d see blood spilling over the side of the boat.”

Whitaker said the vessel’s crew told Greenpeace they were acting legally and primarily targeting swordfish.

Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email

According to the European Union’s reporting to the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission (WCPFC), the Playa Zahara caught more than600,000kg of blue sharkin 2023 in thePacific Southwest.

Patricia Rodríguez, a spokesperson for Viverdreams Fish, the company that owns Playa Zahara, said in a statement the boat acted in accordance with international law and capturing species such as the mako shark and blue shark was not prohibited.

“The species mentioned by Greenpeace are within the quotas and limits allowed by the competent authorities, and the capture, handling and unloading procedures are controlled and documented, by all the systems established by the EU and Spanish authorities,” Rodríguez said.

The statement accused Greenpeace of “a campaign of disinformation”, violating maritime laws, stealing the fishing gear and posing risks to crews on both vessels by its intervention.

“Our company is strongly committed to the sustainability of marine resources and regularly collaborates with scientists, independent observers and fisheries authorities to ensure compliance with conservation standards,” she said.

AGreenpeace analysishas estimated that almost half a million blue sharks were caught as bycatch in the Pacific Ocean last year – the highest number recorded since 1991.

The same report found nearly 70% of EU longline catches in the region in 2023 were blue sharks.

World leaders will meet in Nice next week for the UN ocean conference to discuss thehigh seas biodiversity treaty, which Australia signed in 2023 but is yet to ratify.

Greenpeace has urged the government to ratify the treaty within the first 100 days of its second term. The treaty requires 60 countries to ratify it before it comes into force, but as yetonly 32 have done so.

Shark fishing is a lucrative global trade, worth an estimated$1bn annually. Global demand for shark meathas doubled in the past two decades.

Dr Leonardo Guida, a shark scientist with the Australian Marine Conservation Society, said the level of exploitation was alarming, given more thanone-third of shark and ray species are threatened with extinction globally.

“Sharks are important in the ecosystem, they typically occupy the top of marine food webs,” he said. “Steep population declines will cause food webs to potentially become unstable and ultimately collapse, there is a clear impact their loss could have on food security for a lot of nations.”

Guida said the creation of no-take marine sanctuaries was essential – to preserve marine life and to understand how ecosystems respond to the combined pressures of overfishing and the climate crisis.

“These sanctuaries act as controls,” he said. “They help us compare areas impacted by fishing with those that are not, which is critical to building resilience in ocean wildlife and managing our fisheries in a rapidly changing world, such that we reduce our impact on different species.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian