Eleanor the Great review – June Squibb takes on Holocaust survivor trauma in Scarlett Johansson’s iffy directing debut

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Scarlett Johansson's Directorial Debut 'Eleanor the Great' Misjudges Holocaust Themes"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Scarlett Johansson's directorial debut, "Eleanor the Great," features a heartfelt performance by 95-year-old June Squibb, who plays Eleanor Morgenstein, a widowed Jewish woman navigating the complexities of aging and trauma. The film, based on a screenplay by Tory Kamen, attempts to explore significant themes such as the Holocaust's lingering effects and the challenges of caring for elderly parents. Eleanor's character is depicted as sharp-tongued and spirited, often confronting the dismissive attitudes of younger generations. Following the death of her close friend Bessie, a Holocaust survivor, Eleanor's loneliness drives her to join a Jewish seniors' group, where she feels compelled to impersonate a survivor herself, drawing on Bessie's past. This premise, however, is undercut by the film's overly sentimental tone, which fails to capture the depth and gravity of the Holocaust experience and the moral implications of Eleanor's deception.

As the narrative unfolds, Eleanor befriends Nina, a journalism student whose mother was also Jewish. Their relationship becomes central to the plot, especially as Nina is inspired by Eleanor's story. However, the film struggles to address the serious nature of Holocaust imposture and its potential repercussions, such as the exploitation of such narratives by Holocaust deniers. Instead, the story diverts to a subplot about Nina's father's personal grief, which detracts from the more pressing issues at hand. Additionally, the film touches on Eleanor's resistance to moving into a care home, a choice that is presented without sufficient exploration of her motivations. Despite Johansson's personal connection to the Holocaust, the film ultimately lacks the necessary depth to engage with its themes meaningfully, leaving Eleanor's journey feeling somewhat superficial and unconvincing. "Eleanor the Great" screened at the Cannes Film Festival, yet it remains an odd and misjudged exploration of profound subjects that deserved a more nuanced treatment.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The review of "Eleanor the Great," directed by Scarlett Johansson, delves into the complexities of Holocaust survivor trauma and the challenges of aging. The film's reception appears to be mixed, with praise directed towards June Squibb's performance and criticism aimed at the film's handling of sensitive themes. This review likely serves multiple purposes, including informing potential viewers and critiquing the artistic choices made by the filmmakers.

Artistic Intent and Reception

The article emphasizes the film's "honestly intentioned" nature, suggesting that it aims to address serious themes with sensitivity. However, it also points out the film's shortcomings, particularly its "bland, TV-movie tone" that fails to capture the gravity of Holocaust experiences. This duality in the review hints at a broader conversation about how films can adequately represent trauma. The intent is to prompt readers to consider the implications of such narratives and the responsibilities of filmmakers in portraying historical events.

Cultural and Societal Impact

In discussing the film's themes, the article touches on societal attitudes toward aging and the care of elderly individuals. The protagonist's struggle with her identity and her need for companionship can resonate with many families facing similar dilemmas. By highlighting these personal and societal issues, the review encourages reflection on how we treat the elderly and the importance of sharing stories of survival. This might evoke empathy and a reconsideration of the audience's own relationships with older generations.

Public Perception and Manipulation

The review is somewhat critical of Johansson's directorial debut, suggesting a lack of depth in handling Holocaust themes. This could influence public perception of both the film and Johansson as a director. While the review does not overtly manipulate, it does guide readers towards a critical stance, potentially shaping their expectations and opinions before viewing the film. The language used suggests a cautionary approach to how sensitive subjects should be treated in cinema.

Connection to Broader Contexts

There may be a connection between this review and ongoing discussions about representation in media, especially concerning marginalized communities. It aligns with a growing scrutiny of how trauma and history are depicted in films and could be part of a larger narrative about the responsibility of artists to engage with their subjects thoughtfully.

Potential Economic and Political Implications

While primarily focused on the film, the review could indirectly influence the film industry by setting standards for how Holocaust narratives are approached. If audiences react negatively to the film, it may affect box office performance and future projects exploring similar themes. The socio-political conversations around representation and storytelling in media can also impact broader cultural agendas.

Community Engagement

The film may appeal to communities specifically interested in Jewish history, Holocaust education, and discussions about aging. These groups may find resonance in the narrative, prompting engagement through screenings, discussions, and educational initiatives around the themes presented in the film.

Market Impact

The review may not have a direct impact on stock markets or global economies. However, it could influence the film's reception and future investments in similar projects by studios. The portrayal of sensitive historical topics can dictate market trends in film production and distribution.

Relevance in Today's Discourse

This review is relevant in today's context as discussions around historical representation in media are increasingly prominent. With audiences more aware of the implications of storytelling, the film's reception could contribute to broader conversations about ethical filmmaking and the importance of authentic narratives.

Use of AI in Writing

While it's unclear if AI was used in crafting this review, the structured approach and analysis suggest a methodical examination of the film. If AI were involved, it might have aided in organizing thoughts or analyzing themes effectively. However, the review displays a human touch, particularly in its emotional resonance and critique.

The review of "Eleanor the Great" offers a nuanced perspective that encourages critical reflection on trauma representation in film. It challenges both filmmakers and audiences to consider the complexities of storytelling, particularly in relation to historical events and personal experiences. Overall, the review is credible in its assessment, providing valuable insights into the film's narrative and thematic execution.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Scarlett Johansson’s directorial feature debut, from a screenplay by Tory Kamen, is honestly intentioned and sweetly acted – notably by the film’s 95-year-old star June Squibb, whose remarkable career renaissance began with her being nominated for a best supporting actress Oscar forAlexander Payne’s 2013 film Nebraska.But this frankly odd film is misjudged and naive about the implications of its Holocaust theme. Its bland, TV-movie tone of sentimentality fails to accommodate the existential nightmare of the main plot strand, or indeed the subordinate question of when and whether to put your elderly parent in a care home.

Squibb plays Eleanor Morgenstein, a widowed Jewish lady with a waspish way of speaking her mind to condescending youngsters, including the blandly unhelpful teen working in a supermarket who presumes to tell Eleanor that all pickles taste pretty much the same – although it is difficult to tell exactly how mean twinkly-eyed lovable Eleanor is supposed to be for humiliating the admittedly dopey kid. She lives in Florida, sharing an apartment with her adored best friend Bessie Stern (Rita Zohar). Bessie is also widowed and Jewish, but unlike the US-born Eleanor, Bessie is aHolocaustsurvivor who is tormented by the horrifying experience, by the memory of her beloved brother who did not survive, and also by the fact that she has never experienced even the partial catharsis of telling her story publicly, having only told Eleanor.

When Bessie dies, Eleanor moves back in with her harassed, divorced daughter Lisa (Jessica Hecht) and grandson (Will Price) in their small New York apartment and, from the first, feels sad and lonely. So she joins a Jewish seniors social group in the city, but is mortified to discover, too late, that it is specifically for Holocaust survivors. And so, poignantly keen to fit in and find companionship, Eleanor pretends to be a survivor, recycling Bessie’s memories and telling herself she’s honouring Bessie’s memory.

What could possibly go wrong? Well, the group is attended by NYU journalism student Nina (Erin Kellyman) who becomes best pals with the feisty Eleanor. Nina’s late mum (whose death was agonisingly recent) was Jewish, and Nina is moved by Eleanor’s amazing story and by her intention to get a late-life bat mitzvah; her resulting article interests Nina’s TV news commentator dad, Roger Davis (Chiwetel Ejiofor).

The scene would appear to be set for the most sulphurous black horror non-comedy, surely: an unthinkable humiliation. But when the inevitable happens, nothing much happens at all, as if the film itself wishes to protect sweet old Eleanor from the amazingly stupid and dangerous thing she did. We segue quickly to the tedious non-issue of Roger needing to own his grief, as if that were comparably important or interesting. Everyone accepts Eleanor’s defence about honouring Bessie’s memory and the story isn’t picked up by anyone else. But all grownups know that Holocaust survivor imposture is a serious issue, because such cases can be seized on by neo-Nazis and Holocaust deniers. And it is very fatuous for the “journalists” in this movie not to mention this at all.

Then there is the care home issue. Lisa keeps hinting Eleanor would be better off in one. Eleanor is furious and adamant that she doesn’t want that, and the audience might well agree. She is, after all, razor-sharp mentally and in excellent physical shape. But finally, she seems to blandly accept going into a home. Why?

Johansson has movingly spoken about her own Jewish heritage and about her family forebears who weremurdered during the Holocaust in the Warsaw ghetto. But sadly her Eleanor is far from great.

Eleanor the Great screened at theCannes film festival.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian