EU retaliation against Trump drug tariffs would be bad idea, says industry

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"European Pharmaceutical Industry Urges Against EU Retaliation to Trump's Drug Tariffs"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The European pharmaceutical industry is expressing strong concerns over potential retaliatory measures from the EU in response to anticipated tariffs on imported drugs proposed by U.S. President Donald Trump. The President indicated last week that these sector-specific tariffs could be implemented imminently, possibly as soon as next week. This has prompted industry leaders in Brussels to caution against any reciprocal actions from the EU that could impose additional import duties. Stefan Oelrich, president of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, emphasized that retaliatory tariffs would negatively impact both sides, particularly the flow of exports from the U.S. to Europe, ultimately harming patients through increased costs of medicine and healthcare services. He argued that a mutual agreement to limit trade barriers should be the priority rather than escalating tariff disputes, which would exacerbate financial pressures on both the pharmaceutical industry and patients in Europe.

The ongoing negotiations between the EU and the U.S. are delicate, with various member states advocating for different approaches. While some countries, like France and Germany, support a swift trade deal, others, particularly in the Baltic region, are eager to strengthen ties with the Trump administration following recent NATO developments. Oelrich pointed out that the EU risks falling behind not only the U.S. but also China in drug development, as evidenced by the number of new active substances introduced to the market this year. He highlighted that non-tariff barriers, such as varying national regulations and pricing structures, are deterring biotech companies from engaging in the European market. Furthermore, he criticized practices like 'clawbacks' imposed by governments, which complicate the procurement process for pharmaceuticals. Oelrich's call for reforms in drug financing, pricing, and regulation reflects a broader concern that the EU must adapt to maintain its competitiveness in the global pharmaceutical landscape.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The European pharmaceutical industry has urged Brussels not to retaliate if Donald Trump brings in threatened tariffs on imported drugs, amid fears he could impose the levies as early as next week.

The US presidentsaid last weekthat the sector-specific tariffs were coming “very soon”. There is concern in Brussels that he could impose them imminently to give himself further leverage ahead of his self-imposed 9 July deadline for trade deals with the EU and about 60 countries.

At a briefing in the Belgium capital on Thursday, the president of the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations said it would hurt everyone if the EU hit back with its own import duties.

“We’re shipping a lot of exports out of the US into Europe,” Stefan Oelrich said. “If we add tariffs to that, it’s going to be negative for both sides. If we reciprocate on tariffs, it’s just a bad idea. It’s a bad concept.”

The dynamics of the EU’s negotiations with the US remain finely balanced. France and Germany both back a quick UK-style deal and many other member states, particularly the Baltic nations, are keen to build on warmer relations with Trump after his“big win” at the Nato summitover increased defence spending, as they want to keep the president supporting Ukraine.

With the clock ticking, speculation is mounting that the EU will do a thin deal on automobiles and steel – similar to thebilateral agreementbrokered by Keir Starmer in May, which comes into force on Monday – but with no optimism in the pharma industry that it will be included.

Oelrich said: “There’s no specific ask [of the US] other than … to the degree possible to limit trade barriers to zero, which would be the ideal case for us and/or something similar to zero.Tariffswill increase the cost of medicine and care. Tariffs will also create, ultimately, higher costs to patients.”

After EU leaders met on Thursday, the German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, urged the EU to do a“quick and simple” trade dealrather than a “slow and complicated” one. The French president, Emmanuel Macron, said he wanted a quick and pragmatic agreement but could not accept terms that were not balanced.

Oelrich, who is a member of the board of management at the German pharmaceutical company Bayer, also called for a series of reforms on financing, pricing and regulation of drugs, saying such changes could help to restore Europe’s former lead in research and development of drugs.

His call comes amid fears that the EU is losing out to the US and, increasingly, China, which outpaced Europe in 2023 as an originator of new active substances, with 25 brought to the world market, compared to the EU’s 17 and the US’s 28.

Oelrich said data showed that a quarter of drugs in the past 10 years approved by FDA in the US had not made it to Europe because of non-tariff barriers, such as differing national regulations and pricing. “Many of the biotech companies are not even bothering engaging in Europe. For them it makes no sense,” he said.

Sign up toBusiness Today

Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning

after newsletter promotion

Among the other non-tariff barriers he cited were practices in the industry known as “clawbacks”, whereby governments in large economies including France and the UK agree a specific budget for procurement of particular drugs. But any surplus used in hospitals and clinics is paid for by the pharma companies as a clawback.

“It’s totally senseless. And that’s happening in Europe, and that needs to stop. I could name you endless countries that actually are doing this in Europe,” he said.

“What happens too much in Europe is that the richest countries would like to align to the lowest prices in lower-equity countries … this leads to a situation which is unsustainable.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian