Dutton’s comments show we are back to punching down on Indigenous Australians for attention – and votes | Lorena Allam

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Political Rhetoric Targets Indigenous Australians Amid Election Campaign"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The article reflects on the political climate in Australia during the election campaign, particularly concerning the treatment of Indigenous Australians in public discourse. The author, a Yuwaalaraay woman, expresses her dismay at the prevalence of derogatory rhetoric aimed at Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, which has become a common tactic for garnering attention and votes. This is illustrated by the controversial billboard campaign by Clive Palmer’s party, which promotes a message of exclusion and disrespect toward Indigenous customs, specifically the practice of 'welcome to country.' The author notes that such sentiments are not isolated, as they have been echoed across various media platforms and public events, including the booing of a welcome to country at the Anzac Day dawn service in Melbourne, an incident condemned by politicians for its disrespect towards Indigenous servicemen and women. The author highlights the irony of these politicians' outrage while simultaneously noting that the political landscape has been rife with attacks on Indigenous practices like welcomes to country since the recent defeat of the voice referendum.

The article also discusses the implications of comments made by prominent political figures, particularly Peter Dutton, who claims that welcomes to country are divisive and suggests that many veterans oppose them. The author critiques this perspective, emphasizing the significant contributions of Indigenous Australians to the defense forces and pointing out the lack of Indigenous policy discussion in the current election campaign. The absence of strong leadership on Indigenous issues has left many feeling disenfranchised and uncertain about the future. The author calls for an urgent need to confront racism in politics and media, advocating for a more respectful and inclusive dialogue regarding Indigenous rights and traditions. The article concludes with a sense of urgency for political leaders to take a stand on these issues, as the current atmosphere allows for the normalization of extremist views and undermines the progress made toward reconciliation and respect for Indigenous Australians.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article provides a critical perspective on the political discourse surrounding Indigenous Australians in the context of an election campaign. It highlights the use of derogatory language and imagery aimed at Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, reflecting a troubling trend in Australian politics where marginalized groups are targeted for votes and attention.

Political Manipulation and Targeting Marginalized Groups

The piece underscores the strategy employed by some politicians to gain traction by appealing to nationalism and populism at the expense of Indigenous peoples. The use of statements like “we don’t need to be welcomed to our own country” serves to marginalize and disempower Indigenous voices, reinforcing a narrative that can be damaging in both social and political contexts. The author suggests that this tactic is not new but rather a re-emergence of past methods that exploit vulnerable communities for electoral gain.

Public Sentiment and Reactions

The article captures the emotional toll on Indigenous Australians, as expressed by the author’s personal reflections while commuting. It indicates a growing fatigue among these communities who have long faced political exploitation. The reactions from politicians, although seemingly supportive, are critiqued as insufficient, reflecting a broader reluctance to confront systemic issues affecting Indigenous Australians. This suggests that while there is an acknowledgment of the problem, the solutions offered remain superficial.

Underlying Issues and Broader Implications

The narrative points to a deeper issue of respect and acknowledgment for Indigenous cultures and practices, such as the “welcome to country” ceremonies. These practices are framed as vital cultural expressions that should be integrated into public life, rather than treated as optional or secondary. The article implies that the failure to fully embrace these traditions could lead to increased social division and resentment.

Trustworthiness and Manipulative Elements

In terms of reliability, the article is rooted in the author's lived experience and presents factual observations about the political climate. However, it also employs emotive language to evoke a strong response from the reader, which could be seen as a form of manipulation. The focus on personal narratives and emotional appeals serves to strengthen the argument, yet it may also obscure other perspectives or solutions.

Possible Scenarios and Community Support

The discourse surrounding this article could influence public opinion and potentially affect electoral outcomes, particularly in constituencies with significant Indigenous populations. It is likely to resonate with progressive communities advocating for Indigenous rights, while possibly alienating more conservative voters who may support nationalist rhetoric.

Market and Economic Implications

While the article may not have direct implications for stock markets or global economies, it could influence sectors related to social justice, Indigenous rights advocacy, and public policy. Companies and organizations that prioritize inclusivity and Indigenous partnerships might see shifts in consumer support based on the broader societal mood.

Global Context and Relevance

In a broader context, the article touches on themes of colonialism and indigenous rights that are relevant globally, particularly in countries with similar histories. The issues raised are pertinent to ongoing discussions about reparations, acknowledgment of historical injustices, and the protection of Indigenous rights.

Artificial Intelligence Influence

There is no direct indication that artificial intelligence was used in the creation of this article. However, the structured presentation of arguments and emotional appeals could suggest a strategic approach to writing that aligns with modern journalistic practices, possibly influenced by AI tools in content creation or editing.

Overall, the article is a poignant reminder of the challenges faced by Indigenous Australians in the political landscape and the need for genuine respect and acknowledgment of their rights and cultures.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Most days during the election campaign, millions of my fellow Sydneysiders and I commute past a big cartoon-yellow billboard for Clive Palmer’s Trumpet of Patriots, whose platform declares that “we don’t need to be welcomed to our own country”.

I cycle through a range of emotions while stuck in traffic: despair, anger and finally fatigue. As a Yuwaalaraay woman, I don’t need to be welcomed to my own country; my elders welcome visitors in an act of generosity and respect that is centuries old. This is all so familiar: another election campaign where punching down on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people for attention and votes is the default setting.

Palmer also paid for big yellow ads in the media. The same message was plastered across the front page of Nine newspapers and their websites. News.com.au ran the ad the same day a small group including a “known neo-Nazi” were questioned by police forbooing the welcome to countryat the Melbourne Anzac Day dawn service.

Sign up for the Afternoon Update: Election 2025 email newsletter

Gunditjmara-Bunurong elder Uncle Mark Brown stayed strong as he spoke over the noise. I hope he felt all his people there in solidarity with him, as he clearly felt the irony of talking about sacrifice, respect and unity in the face of such hate.

Politicians were quick to condemn the booing. It was “deplorable”, an “utter disgrace”, a desecration of a “sacred day” for all Australians, including the generations of Indigenous servicemen and women who fought and died for their country.

Speaking afterwards, Peter Dutton said welcomes to country were “an important part of official ceremonies and should be respected”. Anthony Albanese said it was up to individual organisations to decide whether to open their events with one.

In short: a welcome to country is a modern adaptation of a First Nations practice where visitors would seek and be granted safety and welcome from traditional owners to travel through their country, in exchange respecting traditional protocols and practices. Anacknowledgmentof country can be offered by anyone and is usually given at the beginning of a meeting, speech or event.

In recent years, and especially since the defeat of the voice referendum, there have been sustained attacks on welcomes to country in the media, politics, and in sport. Sam Newman suggested puntersshould boo the welcome to countryahead of the 2023 AFL grand final. So, it is disingenuous for politicians on all sides to be shocked and outraged when people decide to turn those words into action, even in the predawn hush of Anzac Day.

By that evening, Wurundjeri elder Aunty Joy Murphy Wandin said she was told by the Melbourne Storm that she wasno longer needed to give the welcome to countryfor their Anzac Day match against the Rabbitohs.

“We were all just dumbfounded,” Aunty Joy told Nine. “We would dearly love to be out there, but they’ve broken our hearts.”

The Storm released a statement blaming the cancellation on a “miscommunication”.

By Sunday night, in the final leaders’ debate before polling day, Duttonhad returned to his view– that welcomes to country were dividing the nation, and there is “a sense across the community that it is overdone”.

Today Dutton leaned even further into his welcome to country bashing byclaiming that most veterans“don’t want [a welcome to country]” on that day.

Sign up toAfternoon Update: Election 2025

Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key election campaign stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters

after newsletter promotion

Of course we don’t know if that’s the case because we haven’t asked them. But Dutton’s comments show an ignorance of thesignificant Indigenous contributionto Australia’s defence forces.

Thousands of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander men and women have served in the ADF, andfought in every major conflictfrom the Boer war to Afghanistan. At least 70 Aboriginal men were stationed on the front lines and in the trenches at Gallipoli. More than 1,000 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders served in the first world war, though it’s hard to pin down exact numbers because those who signed up to fight for country did so despite the Defence Act preventing people “not substantially of European origin or descent” from enlisting.

Long before this weekend, there has been an absence of Indigenous policy in this election campaign, an extension of the leadership vacuum we have felt since October 2023.

In April, former social justice commissioner Mick Gooda said there is alack of courage on Indigenous affairs.

“We need people to stick a stake in the ground about where we’re going,” Gooda said.

“Once we know where they stand … we can move forward. But at the moment, we just don’t know.”

Meanwhile, the Age reports, rightwing extremists are considering moves toestablish their own political party.

It will be a relief to some when the Trumpet of Patriots’ big yellow billboards are dismantled. I know a few people who’d be happy to help. But the festering resentment over welcomes to country, or indeed any of the rights we as First Nations people have fought for and gained, any of the protocols or acts of respect we have sought to maintain, will remain until we see some strong leadership and action on racism in politics and the media.

Anthony Albanese said the “known neo-Nazi” who booed, the ones who have stalked his and other candidates’ campaigns, are a real threat. We need to take them seriously. But we can’t do that without also addressing the licence they are given by the tone of mainstream political debate.

Lorena Allam is descended from the Gamilaraay and Yuwaalaraay nations of north-western NSW. She is the industry professor of Indigenous media at Jumbunna Institute for Indigenous Education and Research at the University of Technology, Sydney

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian