Dieselgate pollution killed 16,000 people in UK, study estimates

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Study Estimates Dieselgate Scandal Responsible for 16,000 Premature Deaths in the UK"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

A recent analysis has revealed that the excess pollution resulting from the Dieselgate scandal has led to approximately 16,000 premature deaths in the UK and 30,000 cases of asthma in children. The study also warns that an additional 6,000 premature deaths are anticipated in the coming years if no corrective measures are taken. The Dieselgate scandal, which surfaced in 2015, involved the discovery that diesel vehicles were emitting significantly higher levels of toxic air pollutants on the road than during regulatory tests, primarily due to the installation of illegal 'defeat devices.' While the US implemented large fines and mandatory recalls to address the issue, experts argue that the UK and many EU nations have not taken adequate steps, resulting in severe public health implications as millions of highly polluting diesel vehicles remain operational across these regions. The analysis specifically focused on the excess emissions attributed to the defeat devices, estimating that these have caused 800,000 days of sick leave and an economic burden of £96 billion due to health-related issues by 2024.

The broader impact of Dieselgate extends beyond the UK, with estimates suggesting around 124,000 early deaths and economic damages of €760 billion (£637 billion) across the UK and EU combined. Without intervention, projections indicate a further 81,000 premature deaths and €430 billion in economic costs by 2040, when many of the implicated vehicles are expected to be off the roads. Researchers emphasize that this public health crisis requires urgent action from governments to mitigate its long-term consequences. Advocacy groups have criticized the UK government for its inadequate response, claiming that the level of accountability for auto manufacturers has been insufficient compared to measures taken in the US. Legal actions are underway as consumers pursue claims against manufacturers, with nearly two million cases currently being considered in the courts. The report, based on extensive data analysis, underlines the critical need for regulatory reforms and effective enforcement to protect public health from the harmful emissions of diesel vehicles.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the alarming health and economic consequences linked to the Dieselgate scandal, emphasizing the significant number of premature deaths and health issues attributed to excess pollution from diesel vehicles in the UK. It aims to raise awareness about the ongoing impact of this scandal and the urgent need for governmental action to address the situation.

Public Perception and Urgency

By presenting stark statistics regarding health impacts, such as the estimated 16,000 deaths and 30,000 asthma cases in children, the article seeks to create a sense of urgency among the public and policymakers. This is likely intended to galvanize support for stricter regulations and actions against polluting vehicles still on the roads.

Potential Concealment and Broader Context

There may be aspects of the broader automotive industry or environmental policies that are not fully addressed in this article, such as the role of other pollutants or the complicity of various stakeholders in allowing the scandal to unfold. The focus on Dieselgate could serve to distract from other environmental issues or regulatory shortcomings.

Manipulative Elements and Trustworthiness

The article employs a persuasive tone, using emotional language to convey the health crisis caused by diesel emissions. While it is grounded in research, the selective presentation of information may lead to perceptions of manipulation. The credibility of the findings hinges on the reliability of the research conducted by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air, which is mentioned in the article.

Comparative Context

When compared to other environmental news, this article aligns with a growing trend of highlighting corporate accountability and public health. It connects with ongoing discussions about climate change and pollution, suggesting a collective responsibility to mitigate these issues.

Implicated Communities and Support

The article is likely to resonate with environmental advocacy groups, health organizations, and communities affected by air pollution. It aims to engage those who are concerned about public health and environmental sustainability, seeking to mobilize support for policy changes.

Economic and Political Implications

The potential economic burden highlighted in the article, estimated at £96 billion due to health impacts, underscores the need for urgent action. This could influence political discourse around environmental regulations, prompting discussions about the financial implications of inaction. It may also affect the automobile industry, particularly companies still producing diesel vehicles.

Global Relevance and Power Dynamics

The implications of this article extend to global discussions about environmental standards and corporate responsibility. It reflects a growing awareness of the health impacts of pollution, which is relevant in the context of international efforts to combat climate change and protect public health.

Artificial Intelligence Influence

While the article does not explicitly indicate the use of AI in its writing, it is possible that AI tools were employed in data analysis or in generating relevant statistics. The structured presentation of data suggests a systematic approach to conveying information, which may have been enhanced by AI technologies.

In conclusion, the article presents significant findings supported by research, emphasizing the dire consequences of diesel emissions. However, the framing of the issue and the focus on certain aspects may suggest a degree of manipulation to achieve its aims. It is essential to consider the broader context and potential biases when interpreting its content, though the underlying statistics appear credible.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The excess pollution emitted as a result of the Dieselgate scandal has killed about 16,000 people in the UK and caused 30,000 cases of asthma in children, according to a new analysis. A further 6,000 premature deaths will occur in coming years without action, the researchers said.

The Dieselgate scandal erupted in 2015 when diesel cars were found to be emitting far more toxic air pollution on the roads than when they passed regulatory tests, due to the use of illegal “defeat devices”.

Large fines and compulsory recalls of vehicles to remove or disable the defeat devices took place in the US. But experts say the UK and most EU countries have lagged far behind, leading to devastating impacts on health, and urge immediate action. Many millions ofhighly polluting diesel vehicles remain on the roadsin the UK and EU.

The analysis estimated the impact of only the excess pollution released due to the defeat devices, not the total emissions from the cars. In the UK, these excess emissions had led to 800,000 days of sick leave and a total economic burden due to deaths and poor health of £96bn by 2024.

Across the UK and EU combined, the fallout from Dieselgate has included about 124,000 early deaths and economic damage of €760bn (£637bn), the study estimated. Without action, a further 81,000 premature deaths and €430bn are projected by 2040, by which time most Dieselgate vehicles will no longer be in use.

“Our calculations reveal the widespread and devastating health impacts of excessive diesel emissions – thousands of lives cut short, countless children developing asthma, and an immense burden of chronic illness,” said Dr Jamie Kelly, at the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (Crea), which conducted the research for environmental law group ClientEarth.

“This is a crisis with a long and lingering legacy,” he said. “Without action, these impacts will stretch far into the future, affecting generations to come. Governments have a responsibility to break this cycle.”

ClientEarth lawyer Emily Kearsey said: “The scale of the UK government’s response has been completely disproportionate to the public health crisis that we’re facing. Auto manufacturers have been trying to sweep the Dieselgate scandal under the carpet for too long. The UK government has the opportunity to finally stand up for people’s health and hold polluters accountable.”

Jemima Hartshorn, of campaign group Mums for Lungs, said: “Millions of diesel cars on our roads are still emitting toxically high levels of pollution and it’s costing our health, especially the health of our children.”

Defeat devices have been illegal since before the Dieselgate scandal but in 2020 new UK law placed a duty on the government to investigate vehicles suspected of using defeat devices. New powers in 2021 enabled the government to create laws that could force manufacturers to recall vehicles on environmental grounds. These powers have yet to be used, although it is believed a consultation is planned.

In 2023, ClientEarth sent a legal complaint to the government based on the strong evidence that many vehicles using defeat devices remained on the road. After this, thegovernment said in 2024that it was investigating 47 different car models under 20 brands by 11 manufacturers, and that more would follow.

In the US, regulators fined Volkswagen £1.45bn and the company also had to pay $5bn into pollution mitigation funds for its role in Dieselgate. It was also forced to fix the cars or buy them back. In contrast, the UK has imposed no fines on any car company nor forced any recalls. “In the UK, and the EU on the whole, there’s just not been anywhere near the same level of accountability,” said Kearsey.

Instead, individual consumers have been left to fight for financial compensation from manufacturers through the UK courts, leaving the excessively polluting vehicles on our roads. Almost 2 million consumer claims are now being pursued in the high court against 18 auto-manufacturers alleged to have used prohibited defeat devices.

In 2022, Volkswagen agreed to pay£193m to 91,000 driversin England and Wales. Some car manufacturers have undertaken voluntary recalls to fix the vehicles but public information on this is limited and only a small fraction of affected vehicles are likely to have been covered.

TheCrea reportused data on car fleets and real-world emissions and modelling to estimate the impact of the excess emissions due to Dieselgate. The models have been widely used in scientific research and the relationships between nitrogen dioxide and small particle pollution and ill health and deaths were taken from published studies.

The analysis considered emissions that were more than double the legal limit as excess and almost certainly due to the use of defeat devices. It covered such diesel vehicles approved from 2009. A stricter real-world emissions test was fully implemented in the EU in 2021.

Prof Suzanne Bartington, at the University of Birmingham, UK, said it was clear that the toxic emissions led to early deaths and disease. She said a more conservative approach would not have added the premature deaths from NO2 and from small particles together, as it is unclear to what extent each contributes to mortality individually.

“We tend to use the higher of either estimate,” she said. That approach would give an estimate of 13,000 Dieselgate deaths in the UK by 2024, rather than the Crea central estimate of 16,000.

On Monday, a regional court in Germanysentenced four former VW managers for fraud, with two sent to prison and two given suspended sentences.

A Department forTransportspokesperson said:“Defeat devices are illegal, misleading for drivers and can have negative health impacts on the public. We routinely and robustly check vehicles against emission standards and acted quickly to set up an investigation on this matter. We will work with industry to resolve any issues identified.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian