‘Deeply traumatic’: the families failed by a broken post-adoption system in England

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Adoptive Families in England Face Challenges from Inadequate Support System"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.1
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Victoria Bristow's experience highlights the profound challenges faced by adoptive parents within England's post-adoption support system. After adopting two neurodiverse siblings in 2013, Bristow struggled for years with inadequate resources and support, ultimately leading to her decision to place her son back into care due to his violent behavior. Despite her unwavering love for her children and her dedication to providing them with a stable home, Bristow felt overwhelmed and unsupported. Medical professionals and law enforcement recommended that social services accommodate her son, but she had to fight to receive the help she desperately needed. Now, her son is in a residential placement receiving the necessary support, while her daughter depends on therapy, which has seen significant funding cuts from the government. Bristow worries that the system is unable to support existing adoptive families, let alone new ones, highlighting a looming crisis in post-adoption care.

The stories of Bristow and others illustrate a broader issue affecting adoptive families across England. Many parents report feeling threatened by social services when seeking help, with fears of prosecution for abandonment or losing custody of their other children. The children’s minister acknowledged that a considerable number of adopted children return to the care system each year, although comprehensive data on this issue is lacking. Advocacy groups like PATCH are emerging to address these concerns, calling for trauma-informed approaches and better resources for adoptive families. They stress the need for systematic changes to prevent adoption breakdowns and to ensure that love alone is not viewed as sufficient for healing children who have experienced early trauma. The call for a public inquiry into current social work practices and the establishment of independent oversight reflects a growing recognition of the urgent need for reform in a system that is currently failing many families.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights the struggles of families navigating a post-adoption system in England, particularly focusing on Victoria Bristow's experience with her adopted son. It sheds light on the inadequacies of support systems in place for adoptive families, especially those dealing with neurodiverse children from traumatic backgrounds. The emotional weight of Bristow's story serves to illustrate the broader systemic failures within the adoption framework.

Systemic Failures in Support

The article paints a grim picture of the support—or lack thereof—provided to adoptive families. Bristow's experience of having only basic parenting courses as support underscores the inadequacy of resources available to families facing significant challenges. The reduction in funding for therapeutic services further exacerbates the situation, indicating a systemic failure that leaves families feeling abandoned and overwhelmed.

Public Sentiment and Awareness

By sharing Bristow's heart-wrenching narrative, the article aims to galvanize public awareness about the struggles faced by adoptive families and the urgent need for reform in the post-adoption support system. The emotional appeal serves to elicit empathy and provoke discussions about government accountability and the necessity for better resources.

Potential Concealment of Broader Issues

While the article focuses on the personal story of Bristow, it could also be seen as an avenue to highlight deeper systemic issues within social services that may not be fully addressed in public discourse. By concentrating on individual narratives, there may be an implicit avoidance of discussing larger structural problems in the adoption and child welfare systems.

Assessment of Credibility and Manipulation

The article appears credible as it draws on specific experiences and quotes from Bristow, providing a personal touch that often resonates with readers. However, the emotional language used may lead some to perceive it as manipulative, especially if it oversimplifies complex systemic issues in favor of a more emotionally charged narrative. The manipulation lies not in deceit but rather in the emotional framing of the subject matter, which seeks to inspire action or change.

Connection to Broader Issues

In comparison to other reports on social services, this article fits within a larger narrative concerning the inadequacies of public welfare systems in the UK, particularly in how they cater to vulnerable populations. The focus on adoption and systemic failures can resonate with related issues in healthcare, education, and social services, suggesting a need for holistic reform across multiple sectors.

Implications for Society and Economy

The narrative has the potential to impact societal perceptions of adoption and child welfare policies. If public sentiment grows in favor of reform, it could lead to increased funding and resources for social services. Economically, this could entail reallocating budgets or increasing government spending to address these pressing needs.

Community Support and Target Audience

The article likely resonates more with communities involved in adoption, foster care, and child welfare advocacy. It appeals to those who have experienced similar challenges and seeks to foster a sense of solidarity among families navigating these complex systems.

Market Impact and Investment Relevance

In terms of market implications, this article may not directly influence stock markets or specific industries. However, companies involved in mental health services or child welfare technology could see a rise in interest or investment if public awareness leads to increased demand for innovative solutions in these areas.

Geopolitical Context

While the article primarily addresses domestic issues within England, it reflects a broader global conversation about child welfare and adoption. As nations grapple with similar challenges, the insights shared could influence international discussions on best practices in supporting adoptive families.

Use of AI in Content Creation

There is no clear indication that AI was used in creating this article, though AI models could potentially assist in analyzing data or generating content. However, the human touch in storytelling, emotional engagement, and personal experience suggests that this piece is driven more by personal narrative than by algorithmic generation.

The article's focus on personal experience, systemic failure, and emotional appeal reflects a significant need for reform in the adoption support system, aiming to bring attention to the challenges faced by families like Bristow's. The overall credibility of the piece is strong, given its grounded personal narrative, yet it does carry the potential for manipulation through its emotional framing.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Victoria Bristow was devastated when she was forced to place her adopted son back into the care of social services in England after years of struggling with little support.

“It broke my heart. But my son’s behaviour was unmanageable. He was violent. He would attack his sister, he would attack me, he attacked his grandmother. He was running away, and I was having to report him as missing – at this point he was only 10 years old,” she said.

She adopted two siblings, then aged one and three, in north Derbyshire in 2013 with her former husband. The siblings, who are neurodiverse, came from a traumatic family background and quickly developed challenging behaviour.

After years of little support other than “basic parenting courses”, Bristow had to beg social services to accommodate her son, even though medical professionals and the police advised it was the best course of action.

“I love my children. I would walk over hot coals for my children and never, ever have I regretted making them my children,” she said. “I can hate some of the things my son has done but I love him. I want him to be a happy adult with a fulfilled existence, surrounded by family and friends that love him. But at the moment, I can’t get him there on my own.”

He is now in a residential placement and getting an enhanced level of support. Meanwhile, her younger daughter relies heavily on therapy, funded by the Adoption and Guardian Support Fund, which wascut by 40%per child by the government in April, news Bristow found deeply worrying.

“That support has been life saving, and I know that sounds dramatic, but it’s really not. Families are held together by this therapeutic work, it is the glue. The NHS just can’t provide it, so there’s nowhere else to turn,” she said. “There’s a lot of talk about recruiting new adopters and that scares me because thesystem can’t supportthe adopters that are already in existence.

“How on earth does anybody think that more families can be supported when the families that are already begging for help can’t get it?”

Her experience is not unique. The children’s minister, Janet Daby, recently told parliament that 170 – to 180 adopted children return to the care system each year, although she admitted “the figures are not as robust as we would like them to be”.

The subject is still something of a taboo – campaigners and adoptive parents are aware that many people in power are reluctant to highlight an issue that may deter much-needed adoptive parents from coming forward.

But parents say there is an unacknowledged crisis of poor post-adoption support, and a lack of oversight in what happens when things go wrong.

Many adoptive parents said they had been threatened with prosecution for abandonment, or told they risked their other children being taken into care, when asking for their children to be housed by their local authority.

Demand for specialist lawyers is rising, and adoptive parents are more vocally campaigning for better rights and support.

Sarah* and her husband adopted a two-year-old boy after she had a hysterectomy in her 20s after struggling with endometriosis.

From a young age her son struggled with anger, and began hitting his parents from the age of four. They attended several parenting courses, worked with his school and begged social services for more support.

Things deteriorated rapidly after Sarah’s husband died of cancer. “It got way, way worse because I was dealing with it by myself. It was really hard and my mental health started to really take a nosedive,” she said.

Her son was eventually diagnosed with foetal alcohol spectrum disorder, and as he got older, the violence got worse. “My strongest memory is of lying on my bed and my son literally repeatedly kicking me in the stomach. This was happening on a daily basis and I went to hospital a few times because of my injuries,” she said.

“I just got to the point where I had a complete breakdown and said I can’t do this any more. I was a child protection social worker – professional, responsible, well educated. I really researched everything I possibly could to try to help my son. But my life had just changed beyond recognition.”

She first applied through section 20 of the Children’s Act for her local authority to temporarily accommodate her son, before a care order was issued, meaning she now shares parental responsibility with them.

She said the whole experience was “deeply and painfully traumatic” and has left her feeling suicidal. “At first, they said if I went ahead with it then I could be taken to court for abandonment,” she said. Then, during the court proceedings for the care order, she felt she was blamed for what happened to her son.

“I know what kind of parent I’ve been and I know how dedicated I’ve been to my son, and it was almost like none of that counted for anything,” she said.

Sarah is part of a group called PATCH (Passionate Adopters Targeting Change with Hope) that has swelled to 1,500 members, who all have similar experiences of poor post-adoption support, in many cases leading to an adoption breakdown.

The group’s founder, Fiona Wells, an adopter and social worker, recently wrote to the children’s minister to say that “a 360-degree cycle of unmet need, systemic failure, and significant human cost” was leading to “an increasing number of adopted and post-adopted children returning to care”.

The group is calling for “trauma-responsive, recovery-focused planning” that moves away from the “assumption that love is enough” to help adopted children heal.

They also want official data to be collected on the number of adoption breakdowns nationwide, a public inquiry into “punitive, blame-based social work practices”, and independent audit panels led by those with lived experience of social care.

“The current systemic response to families in crisis – particularly where early life trauma is a factor – is nothing short of scandalous,” Wells said.

  • Some names have been changed to protect anonymity.
Back to Home
Source: The Guardian