Dead elephants and feral sea lions: how poisonous algal blooms harm the planet

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Scientists Link Elephant Deaths to Toxic Algal Blooms Amid Rising Environmental Concerns"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In May 2020, conservationists were alarmed by the sudden deaths of over 350 elephants in the Okavango Delta, which raised concerns about poaching and other potential causes. The elephants exhibited unusual behavior before dying, collapsing suddenly and leaving their tusks intact. After nearly five years of investigation, scientists attributed these deaths to toxic water resulting from a harmful algal bloom triggered by a climatic shift between dry and wet conditions. The rapid increase in cyanobacteria, which release lethal toxins, was exacerbated by the pandemic's impact on timely sampling and research efforts. Algal blooms can significantly alter aquatic ecosystems and are driven by a combination of nutrient pollution and climate change, leading to increased occurrences of 'dead zones' in various water bodies where marine life struggles to survive.

The alarming rise in harmful algal blooms is not limited to elephants; these phenomena are impacting marine life, freshwater ecosystems, and even human health globally. Studies indicate that blooms have become more frequent and severe, particularly in regions reliant on agricultural fertilizers. The detrimental effects of algal blooms extend to commercial fisheries, with incidents of mass fish kills reported in various areas, such as northern Norway and South Australia. The consequences are also evident in the behavior of marine mammals, with an increase in aggressive incidents involving sea lions in California linked to algal toxins. As the planet warms, experts warn that the frequency and severity of algal blooms will continue to escalate, leading to profound disruptions in aquatic ecosystems and posing challenges to both biodiversity and human activities dependent on healthy water systems.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article delves into the alarming deaths of elephants in the Okavango delta, attributing it to toxic algal blooms linked to environmental changes. This narrative raises significant concerns regarding the impact of climate change and pollution on wildlife.

Environmental Concerns and Public Awareness

The report aims to highlight the severe consequences of algal blooms, which are on the rise due to pollution and climate change. It seeks to inform the public about the unexpected dangers these blooms pose not just to wildlife, but also potentially to humans—a crucial point as it connects environmental health with human health. By focusing on the tragic deaths of elephants, the article invokes an emotional response that may drive public interest and concern for conservation efforts.

Creating a Sense of Urgency

There is an underlying urgency in the article regarding the need for immediate action to combat climate change and pollution. The mention of the link between algal blooms and human activities, like agricultural runoff, serves as a call to action for policymakers and the public alike. The narrative suggests that without addressing these issues, more wildlife—and possibly humans—could face dire consequences.

Potential Omissions

While the article provides a thorough account of the elephants' deaths, it may sidestep broader systemic issues related to climate change and environmental policies. The focus on a singular event can lead to a perception that the problem is isolated rather than part of a larger, ongoing crisis. This selective storytelling may obscure the complexity of the issue and the multifaceted solutions required.

Manipulative Aspects

The article employs emotionally charged language and vivid imagery to evoke sympathy for the elephants, which could be seen as manipulative. This tactic can engage readers effectively but may also lead to a skewed perception of the situation. The emphasis on the elephants' suffering could overshadow discussions about human responsibility and the need for systemic change.

Reliability and Credibility

The reliability of the article hinges on the scientific findings cited regarding the cause of death for the elephants. While the research provides a plausible explanation, the lack of immediate evidence collected during the initial outbreak raises questions about the conclusions drawn. The article relies on expert opinions, which do lend credibility, but the absence of definitive data from the time of the events could limit its overall trustworthiness.

Socioeconomic Implications

The discussion of algal blooms and their effects can have broader implications for public health, economies reliant on fishing and tourism, and environmental policy. The rising frequency of such blooms could lead to economic downturns in affected areas, prompting calls for better environmental regulations.

Target Audience

The article likely appeals to environmental activists, conservationists, and the general public concerned with wildlife and ecological issues. It aims to engage readers who may not be fully aware of the interconnectedness of climate change, pollution, and biodiversity loss.

Impact on Markets and Policy

While the article may not directly influence stock markets, sectors like agriculture, fishing, and tourism could feel the repercussions of heightened awareness around algal blooms and their consequences. Increased public concern may lead to policy changes that impact these industries.

Global Context

In the context of global power dynamics, this article reflects ongoing debates about environmental responsibility and climate change. It resonates with current discussions about how nations manage their natural resources and the impact of industrial activities on the environment.

Considering all these aspects, it appears that the article’s primary intention is to raise awareness about a critical environmental issue while prompting readers to reflect on their role in these ecological challenges.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Before the elephants collapsed, they walked in aimless circles. Some fell head first, dying where they stood moments earlier; their carcasses scattered near watering holes across the Okavango delta. Theunexplained deathsin May 2020 alarmed conservationists. By July, at least 350 elephants had died and nobody knew why.

“The animals all had their tusks, so poaching was unlikely. A lot of them had obviously died relatively suddenly: they had dropped on to their sternums, which was indicating a sudden loss of muscle function or neural capacity,” says Niall McCann, director of the conservation group National Park Rescue.

Nearly five years later, in November 2024, scientists finally published a paper indicating what they believe to be the reason behind the deaths: toxic water caused by an algal bloom.

A sudden shift between dry and wet conditions in 2019 and 2020 created perfect conditions for cyanobacteria that release toxins lethal to the elephants, although the researchers could not make definitive conclusions as samples were not taken quickly enough in 2020 due to the pandemic.

“Blooms” are a rapid increase in the amount of algae, often occurring in shallow, slow-moving warm water. They can transform a sea, lake or river into a mass of green, yellow, brown or even red, sometimes for several weeks. Not all blooms are harmful – many sustain important fisheries.

But sometimes algae forms such a thick layer that it blocks out sunlight in critical habitats; others can release harmful toxins. When the algae die, they rapidly deplete oxygen in water – often creating “dead zones” where few fish can survive.

As the Earth warms, harmful algal blooms are on the rise – evencreeping into polar waters. They are driven by a mixture of pollution from agriculture, runoff from human waste and, increasingly, global heating – sometimes with dramatic consequences for wildlife and humans. As they spread, they are changing the colour of the world’s lakes, rivers and oceans.

Nearlytwo-thirds of all lakes have changed colourin the past 40 years, according to a recent study. A third are blue – but as temperatures warm, they are likely to turn a murky green or brown, otherresearch has found. The planet’soceans are turning greenas they warm, a result of absorbing more than 90% of excess heat from global warming.

At sea, the size and frequency of blooms in coastal areas has risen by 13.2% and 59.2% respectively between 2003 and 2020,according to a 2024 study.

In freshwater systems,blooms became 44% more frequentglobally in the 2010s, according to a 2022 global assessment of 248,000 lakes. The rise was largely driven by places in Asia and Africa that remain reliant on agricultural fertiliser. While progress has been made in North America, Europe and Oceania to stabilise blooms, the climate crisis has driven their resurgence in some freshwater systems.

The fertilisers that people use to grow plants – including reactive nitrogen and phosphates – also supercharge algal growth. As they are washed off fields and pour into water bodies around the world, they significantly alter how ecosystems function.

“Humans are today loading more reactive nitrogen into the biosphere than the natural cycle [is],” said Johan Rockström, director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. He was co-author of a2023 assessmentthat found that humanity had now gone far beyond the planet’s natural limits for nitrogen and phosphorus.

“We need to reduce the supply of reactive human nitrogen by over 75%. It’s a dramatic change and there’s a lot of scientific debate about this,” he says.

“Most agricultural scientists say that it is not possible because we cannot feed humanity. We have a contradiction here: is our first objective to keep the planet’s freshwater systems, coastal zones, ecosystems and climate stable – or is it to feed humanity?”

Others warn that it is not a simple choice between food and the environment. In northern Norway, repeated algal blooms have wiped out millions of farmed salmon and cod in recent years. A single bloomkilled more than seven million salmonin 2019. This year, another haswiped out up to a million more fish.

As has just happened in South Australia, where it spanned 8,800 sq km (3,400 sq miles), scores of fish and dead sea life wash up on beaches once ahuge algal bloom spreads. Deep-water sharks, crabs, lobsters and prawns are among those found dead as a result of the toxic blanket created byKarenia mikimotoialgae, with the ocean 2.5C (4.5F) hotter than usual for the season.

In March, ateenager was attacked by a “feral” sea lionoff the coast of southern California, where there has been an increase in aggressive behaviour from the animals linked to a large algal bloom, which can poison and induce seizures in the mammals due to the domoic acid neurotoxin it produces. While there are signs that the bloom is waning, it was the fourth consecutive year that California had experienced a significant outbreak.

However, not everything dies in a dead zone. Once the putrid expanse of algae has dispersed and those that can swim away have left, aquatic species better adapted to low levels of oxygen, or hypoxia, move in. This has led to a boom injellyfish numbers in many parts of the world.

Denise Breitburg, of the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center, has studied Chesapeake Bay, the largest estuary in the US to experience algal blooms, for decades, says: “The jellyfish we have here are way more tolerant of low oxygen in the water than species they would be competing with for food. They become more efficient predators and can utilise habitat that fin fish are excluded from.”

As the world heats, the disruptions that algal blooms cause to ecosystems will be hard to stop, experts warn. Prof Donald Boesch, who helped first identify thedead zone in the Gulf of Mexico, which last year reached 17,000 sq km, the 12th largest in 38 years of records, says the process will get worse if the world does not prevent rising temperatures.

“As the liquid heats up, its ability to dissolve gases is reduced, so it holds less oxygen. Warmer surface waters can increase the stratification of layers in the ocean. It means that the warmer waters at the surface are less dense than the bottom waters, so they don’t get mixed up.

“It’s going to get worse,” says Boesch.

Find moreage of extinction coverage here, and follow the biodiversity reportersPhoebe WestonandPatrick Greenfieldin the Guardian app for more nature coverage

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian