David Tennant on sex scenes, Doctor Who and his run-in with Kemi Badenoch: ‘The trans debate has become unnecessarily cruel’

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"David Tennant Discusses 'Rivals', Media Culture, and the Trans Rights Debate"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.3
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

David Tennant stars as the charismatic yet unscrupulous Lord Tony Baddingham in Disney’s 'Rivals', a screen adaptation of Jilly Cooper's 1980s novel that delves into the lives of feuding media moguls in the Cotswolds. Tennant, whose previous roles include a serial killer in 'Des' and a demon in 'Good Omens', finds himself in a comedic yet dramatic landscape, where the series has garnered significant attention. He expresses surprise at the show's success, attributing it partly to the timeless allure of Cooper's writing. As 'Rivals' prepares for its second season, Tennant hints at the potential for his character's return, despite a dramatic cliffhanger ending that left audiences questioning his fate. The production process has been lively, with Tennant describing the cast as social and occasionally problematic, leading to a fun yet chaotic atmosphere on set. He also candidly discusses the challenges of filming intimate scenes, acknowledging the awkwardness that can arise in such situations while emphasizing the importance of safety protocols in these scenarios.

Tennant's comments extend beyond the realm of acting, touching on issues of social commentary and the current state of media representation. He reflects on a previous incident where he publicly addressed Kemi Badenoch regarding transgender rights, leading to a media frenzy. Tennant expresses concern about the hostile nature of current debates, particularly surrounding trans issues, suggesting that the discourse has become disproportionately cruel and silencing. He believes that most people simply wish to let others be themselves and that the loud minority often drowns out the majority's more tolerant views. As he embarks on new projects, including 'The Hack', which explores the phone-hacking scandal, Tennant remains engaged in both the creative and social aspects of his work, balancing his roles as an actor and executive producer while navigating the complexities of contemporary discussions in society.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on David Tennant’s recent role in the television adaptation of Jilly Cooper’s novel, "Rivals," while also touching upon his previous work and current societal issues. It presents a mix of personal insights from Tennant and a glimpse into his character, which could engage both fans of the actor and followers of contemporary television.

Purpose Behind the Publication

The primary aim of this article appears to be to promote "Rivals" by highlighting Tennant's involvement and character. Additionally, it seeks to connect with audiences through Tennant's charm and wit, creating a relatable image that could enhance viewer interest. The mention of Tennant's past roles, including his iconic character in "Doctor Who," serves to reinforce his standing as a beloved figure in the entertainment industry, potentially drawing in a diverse audience.

Public Sentiment

By focusing on Tennant’s humorous and charismatic personality, the article establishes a positive public sentiment towards him and the show. It may also subtly critique the seriousness of current social debates, particularly regarding the trans community, by suggesting that such discussions have become excessively harsh, which could resonate with readers who share similar views.

Information Omitted

While the article provides insights into Tennant’s character and personal experiences, it does not delve deeply into the potential controversies surrounding the trans debate. This omission could indicate a desire to prevent polarizing opinions from overshadowing the promotional aspect of the article, thereby maintaining a focus on the entertainment value rather than engaging in divisive discussions.

Manipulative Elements

The article does not overtly manipulate readers but employs Tennant’s affable nature to generate interest and sympathy. The lighthearted tone contrasts with the serious nature of the trans debate, possibly attempting to soften the discourse surrounding it. This could lead to a perception that the entertainment industry is more focused on creating engaging content than addressing social issues.

Comparative Analysis

This article can be compared to other celebrity interviews, which often blend personal anecdotes with promotional content. Similar articles frequently highlight the charm of the interviewee while downplaying contentious topics. This trend suggests a broader media strategy to maintain a positive public image for celebrities while subtly addressing current societal issues.

Impact on Society and Economy

The focus on entertainment personalities like Tennant may foster a sense of community among fans, potentially leading to increased viewership for "Rivals." This could have a beneficial economic impact on the production companies involved. Additionally, the ongoing discussions about the trans community in the context of popular media may influence public opinion, leading to greater awareness or backlash depending on the narrative pushed by the media.

Target Audience

The article likely appeals to fans of Tennant, viewers of British television, and individuals interested in societal debates. By addressing both entertainment and social issues, it aims to attract a wide range of readers, from casual viewers to those engaged in discussions about representation and inclusivity.

Market Influence

While the article itself may not have a direct impact on stock markets, the success of "Rivals" and other projects featuring Tennant could influence shares in production companies or streaming services. Positive reception of the show may lead to increased subscriptions or viewership figures, indirectly affecting market performance.

Geopolitical Context

The article does not directly address geopolitical issues but reflects the cultural landscape in which discussions about gender and representation have become prominent. This relevance to contemporary societal themes aligns with ongoing global conversations about inclusivity and representation in media.

Use of AI in Article Composition

There is no clear indication that AI was used in writing this article; however, if AI were involved, it might have influenced the tone and structure to make it more engaging. AI models could potentially analyze audience preferences, tailoring the article to resonate with readers who favor a light-hearted approach to serious topics.

Trustworthiness of the Article

The article appears credible, as it features a well-known actor and provides insights into his role and character. However, the lack of depth in discussing controversial topics may raise questions about the completeness of the information. Overall, the article can be considered reliable for entertainment insights but may not provide a comprehensive view of the underlying social issues.

Unanalyzed Article Content

It is rare that TV shows are as much of a riot as Disney’sRivals, the screen adaptation of Jilly Cooper’s 1980s bonkbuster about feuding media power players living in the Cotswolds. And David Tennant – as charismatic-but-dastardly TV boss Lord Tony Baddingham – is the show’s rioter-in-chief. In person, the 54-year-old is as charming as his character (if less wicked) – often hooting with laughter to emphasise a point. Rivals isn’t the Scottish actor’s first go at playing the bad guy. While the multi-award-winner is most famous for his stint in Doctor Who, he won an Emmy for his appearance as serial killer Dennis Nilsen in ITV’s Des and starred as a cheeky demon, alongside Michael Sheen, in Good Omens on Prime Video. Series one of Rivals ended with him getting walloped on the head with a TV award, but he promises he’s coming back for Rivals series two.

Were you expecting Rivals to be as massive as it was?I wasn’t, but my wife was. She said that before she’d read the script! Jilly Cooper’s writing has always had a fanbase, but I guess now there’s enough distance from the 1980s that it’s also a period drama.

It looked like a fun shoot. Who was the biggest troublemaker on set?It would be very inelegant of me to be pointing fingers, wouldn’t it? But it was a very social bunch. Sometimes, that was problematic the next day, but everyone turned up and did their job.

Last time we saw Tony, he’d just been hit over the head. Is that the end for him or are you coming back for season two?I mean, it would be quite a weird way to end, wouldn’t it? Maybe you could start season two with the funeral? But we start shooting the day after theBaftas. I don’t know what that means for me on that first morning.

Could it be a hungover start?It might be, yeah!

Did you base TonyBaddingham on anyone?The only example I could think of, who was a television executive with braces and smoke cigars, was Michael Grade. I read his autobiography in preparation. I don’t think it particularly helped. I think he’s probably a more balanced, better human than Tony Barrington is.

The series had some racy scenes. Were there any awkward moments?Anything that involves imitating an intimate experience is not my most comfortable place. Things that are – quite rightly – put in place for safety sometimes make the whole thing a little ridiculous. The modesty pouches!

The 1980s world of Rivals is fuelled by money, power and ruthless media moguls. Howhas that changed today?When Jilly wrote it, it was the world as she experienced it. Now, we can enjoy the awfulness of the way things were, because we can be slightly smug in the fact that it’s not quite as awful as it was then.

You’ve presented thefilm Baftasfor the past two years. At the most recent, you made a joke about Donald Trump being a villain. Were you nervous to do that in a room full of Americans?Should I have been? It’s a funny world – what you’re allowed to say and what you’re not, and what becomes a headline and what doesn’t. You can’t quite predict it. You’re suddenly aware of things you would never have thought twice about, satirical swipes that you might have made without imagining they had consequences beyond a punchline. That feels like it’s being weaponised in all sorts of debates.

At another awards ceremony last year,you called forKemi Badenoch to ‘shut up’on the matter of transgender rights, and it led to amedia frenzy. Shebrought you up again after thesupremecourt ruling about the definition of womanhood. Is it weird to you that thecomment caused such a conversation?It’s very helpful not being on social media, because that’s where, if someone criticises something you’ve said, it can feel like a pile-on and it can feel bigger than it probably is, which probably discourages people from saying things. Because that’s part of the point, isn’t it, that people are terrorised into not holding opinions – the idea that we can be silenced.

You’reexecutive producing and starring inThe Hack, about the phone-hacking scandal. What’s the most shocking thing you learned?Oh God, it’s a minefield to talk about, as you can imagine; lawyers from every side of the debate are poring over anything that is said. But the whole thing was a shocker.

I saw a story recently about bookies betting thatNcuti Gatwawas going to leave Doctor Who and be replaced by you. Is there any truth to that?Ha, nobody’s told me that!

Are you protective of the doctors that have come after you, having seenwhatJodie WhittakerandGatwafaced?These debates – and it’s not even a debate, it’s a small clutch of people shouting very loudly, amplified by certain elements of the press – are not reflective of what most people feel. Things become ludicrously disproportionate, and end up being unnecessarily cruel. That’s what the trans debate seems to have become. Most people don’t give a shit. I genuinely believe most people just want to let people be themselves. All they’re doing is making a tiny portion of society who have a really tough time anyway have an even tougher time.

What’s your guilty pleasure show?I love The Masked Singer. And The Traitors was just glorious.

The BaftaTelevisionAwards with P&O Cruises is on BBC One and BBC iPlayer tomorrow at 7pm.

Catch the full lineup of our Bafta TV special launching across the weekend and starring best actor nomineesDavid Tennant, Lennie James, Monica Dolan, Billie Piper, Richard Gadd, Marisa Abela and Sharon D Clarke

Read more in the series

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian