‘Danny Dyer deserved nothing!’ The biggest mistakes from the 2025 TV Bafta awards

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"2025 TV Bafta Awards: A Mixed Bag of Winners and Surprising Choices"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The 2025 TV Bafta awards showcased the charm of an underdog event in the British television industry. Although the ceremony lacks the glamour of other awards like the Emmys and the film Baftas, it still holds a unique reputation. This year, the awards presented a mix of results that sparked discussions about whether the right winners were chosen. While some awards aligned with popular consensus, others, such as the best comedy actor award going to Danny Dyer, raised eyebrows. However, notable achievements included Jessica Gunning's well-deserved win for best supporting actress for her performance in Netflix's miniseries 'Baby Reindeer', which generated significant discourse upon release. Her portrayal of a stalker captivated audiences with its emotional depth, making her victory one of the highlights of the night.

On the other hand, the best limited drama award went to ITV’s 'Mr Bates vs the Post Office', a series that effectively highlighted the Post Office scandal and its real-world implications. This choice exemplified the power of drama as a catalyst for change. Other commendable wins included Joe Lycett for best entertainment performance for 'Late Night Lycett' and 'Shōgun' for best international series, both of which were celebrated for their contributions to television. The best actor category was fiercely competitive, with Lennie James's win for 'Mr Loverman' being a fitting acknowledgment of his talent. Despite some questionable choices, such as Ruth Jones winning best female comedy performance over more deserving nominees, the overall sentiment was that the awards recognized significant achievements in television, allowing Bafta to maintain its relevance in the industry.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article provides a critique of the recent 2025 TV Bafta awards, highlighting both commendable choices and controversial decisions, particularly focusing on the awarding of Danny Dyer as best comedy actor. It reflects a certain ambivalence about the awards' relevance in a changing television landscape, as well as a recognition of standout performances, notably by Jessica Gunning.

Perception of the Awards

There seems to be an underlying sense that the TV Baftas, while an important event for the British television industry, lack the prestige and excitement that other awards shows possess. This could suggest a desire to elevate the profile of the TV Baftas, acknowledging their charm but also their shortcomings in comparison to film awards and the Emmys. The discussion around winners and the awards process may foster a sense of community among viewers who share similar opinions on television quality.

Public Sentiment and Hidden Agendas

By focusing on the perceived mistakes and odd choices of the awards, the article may be attempting to stir public discourse about what constitutes merit in television. This could reflect a deeper concern about the direction of TV programming and the industry’s recognition of talent. However, it does not appear to conceal any significant information, rather it engages with the ongoing conversation about television standards.

Manipulative Elements

The article does contain elements that could be seen as manipulative, particularly in its framing of the awards and the winners. Phrases like "resounding 'sort of'" suggest a level of dissatisfaction that could influence public opinion. The choice of words and the emphasis on certain winners, especially Dyer, might be intended to provoke a reaction or discussion among readers.

Trustworthiness of the Reporting

While the article offers insights into the awards and highlights important performances, it also carries a subjective tone that may not fully reflect the broader consensus about the winners. The focus on controversy could skew perceptions, making it essential for readers to seek additional perspectives on the Bafta awards to form a comprehensive understanding.

Impact on Society

As discussions about the awards circulate, they could influence public interest in television programming and the kinds of stories being told. If people feel that the awards do not align with their values or tastes, it could impact viewership and, by extension, the economic viability of certain shows. Such discourse may also prompt a reevaluation of industry standards and practices.

Community Engagement

The article likely resonates more with audiences who are already invested in the British television landscape, including critics, avid viewers, and industry professionals. It appeals to those who appreciate nuanced performances over traditional comedic tropes, indicating a preference for content that challenges the status quo.

Market Considerations

While the article primarily discusses awards and performances, it does not seem to directly impact stock markets or financial sectors. However, the television industry’s reputation and the success of particular shows could have indirect implications for production companies and streaming services. Companies associated with award-winning content may see increased interest from investors and audiences.

Geopolitical Relevance

The piece does not directly address global power dynamics or current geopolitical issues, but it does reflect broader cultural conversations about representation and quality in entertainment. The awarding of certain performances could be viewed in light of ongoing discussions about diversity and inclusion in the media.

AI Influence

It is unlikely that AI significantly influenced the writing of this article, as it maintains a subjective and opinionated tone that tends to be more characteristic of human writers. If AI were involved, it would have likely focused on basic reporting rather than nuanced critique.

In summary, the article critiques the 2025 TV Bafta awards, showcasing both commendable and questionable decisions. It encourages public discourse about the state of television and the recognition of talent, while also reflecting existing sentiments within the community. Overall, the article's reliability is moderate; it provides insights but should be read in conjunction with other sources for a fuller understanding.

Unanalyzed Article Content

There has always been something charmingly underdoggy about the televisionBaftas. It’s the biggest night for the British TV industry, but it almost feels like an afterthought. The awards are dwarfed in glamour and scale not only by the Emmys but by the other Baftas; the film Baftas, the Baftas that famous people actually go to. Yet as comparatively small-fry as they are, the TV Baftas still have their reputation. They might be an increasingly old-fashioned awards show that celebrates several genres that won’t exist a decade from now, but if the right winners keep winning, that’s all that matters.

The big question, then, is whether or not the right winners won. The answer is a resounding ‘sort of’. Ever idiosyncratic, the Baftas this year scattergunned their trophies all over the place, sometimes going with the consensus and other times wandering off and – let’s not beat around the bush – giving a best comedy actor award to Danny Dyer. But we’ll get to that.On the positive side, the ceremony seemed to understand exactly what was good about Baby Reindeer. Netflix’s horrifying miniseries instantly caused a firestorm of discourse upon release, with discussions about the subject matter (not to mention the witch-hunt to locate its real-life inspirations) quickly drowning out everything that deserved to stand out about it. Foremost, it deserved to be defined by Jessica Gunning’s star-making performance as a stalker. Gunning’s spectacular turn was like watching someone whirl a rolodex of extreme emotions at speed. She worried you, horrified you, angered you and made you feel sorry for her with equal weight, and Bafta rewarded her for this. Her best supporting actress award might have been the most greatly deserved of the night.

Equally, though, the awards didn’t go over the top about the show. It was also up for best limited drama, but lost out to ITV’s Mr Bates vs the Post Office. Again, it’s hard to fault this choice; as a series it was able to give more oxygen to the Post Office scandal than a million newspaper headlines, and has caused tangible change in the world. It was a perfect demonstration of what drama can do as a force of good. Again, you won’t hear a word heard against its victory. Similarly, Joe Lycett rightly won best entertainment performance for the wildly brilliant Late Night Lycett, and Shōgun won best international series. Of course it did. It was Shōgun, for crying out loud. What were they going to do, ignore theobvious masterpiece?

It’s even hard to fault the result of best actor, this year’s most closely-fought category. Every single nominee had a solid argument to win. Gary Oldman is the slobby beating heart of Slow Horses, David Tennant the Shakespearean baddie of Rivals. I could have been persuaded to give the trophy to Martin Freeman, whose work on The Responder remains the best of his career. But Lennie James won for Mr Loverman, in a role that deservedly cemented him as one of the best actors we have, and that feels right. After all, to watch any of the others was to revel in a magnificent performance. But, like Jessica Gunning, to watch James in Mr Loverman was to get excited about seeing what else he could do. Very few things are as exciting as that.

But I did say sort of. Did Blue Lights deserve to win best drama over meatier fare like Wolf Hall: The Mirror and the Light? Probably not. And Ruth Jones winning best female comedy performance over the likes of Sophie Willan, Nicola Coughlan and (especially) Kate O’Flynn did feel a little like the voters had been blinded by familiarity.

And then there’s Danny Dyer winning best male performance in a comedy for Mr Bigstuff. Most of the time, it’s fair to say that Dyer deserves every award he’s nominated for. The range of television that he has elevated with his presence is almost beyond compare. He brought heart to the seaside sauciness of Rivals. He was the most lovable rogue of all the lovable rogues EastEnders has ever invented. His episode of Who Do You Think You Are? remains the only episode of Who Do You Think You Are? that people should actually watch.

But Mr Bigstuff was Danny Dyer by numbers. He didn’t bring anything more than his broadest strokes to the show and, given that he was up against some genuinely transformative performances, from the likes of Extraordinary’s Bilal Hasna and G’Wed’s Dylan Thomas-Smith, we might have to put his victory down to a rare case of Bafta getting too starry-eyed for its own good. On the whole, though, the good outweighed the weird. Bafta lives to fight another day.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian