Crumbs! Biscuit museum’s Jaffa Cake display reignites old debate

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"McVitie’s Challenges Museum Display of Jaffa Cakes, Reviving Legal and Consumer Debate"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The ongoing debate surrounding the classification of Jaffa Cakes has resurfaced following a recent dispute between the manufacturer, McVitie’s, and the Peek Frean Museum in Bermondsey, London. McVitie’s requested the museum to remove Jaffa Cakes from its biscuit display, asserting that the snack is legally classified as a cake for VAT purposes. This classification stems from a legal battle that concluded in 1991, where it was determined that Jaffa Cakes are indeed cakes, which are subject to a zero VAT rate, unlike biscuits that attract a 20% tax when covered in chocolate. The museum's curator, Gary Magold, expressed disappointment over the situation, noting that the exhibition had to be temporarily taken down while discussions for a possible resolution continue between the two parties. McVitie’s attempted to soften the blow of its legal request with humorous biscuit-themed language, emphasizing that the name 'Jaffa Cakes' itself indicates their true nature as cakes.

The dispute has incited a lively discussion on social media, where users have shared their thoughts on the age-old question of whether Jaffa Cakes should be considered cakes or biscuits. Some users pointed to the physical characteristics of each, arguing that biscuits become soft while cakes harden over time. Others hinted at a potential ulterior motive behind McVitie’s actions, suggesting that the company might be trying to divert attention from shrinking product sizes, a phenomenon known as shrinkflation. Over recent years, consumers have noticed a decrease in both the number of Jaffa Cakes per box and their individual size, with the diameter of the cakes shrinking from 5.5 cm to 5 cm. As the dispute continues, the discussion around Jaffa Cakes not only highlights the complexities of food classification but also reflects consumer concerns about product quality and pricing in today’s market.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

It could be described as a storm in a teacup but the humble JaffaCakeis once again at the centre of controversy after McVitie’s asked a biscuit museum to pull the snack from a display.

The manufacturer took issue with the orangey treat being showcased in a museum devoted to biscuits because, for VAT purposes anyway, it is officially a cake. This fact was settled long ago in a legal battle with the taxman.

The David and Goliath-style row – which some suggested had been orchestrated by McVitie’s to boost sales – has reignited the debate.

Days after the biscuit museum in Bermondsey, southLondon, unveiled the display, McVitie’s sent it a cease-and-desist-style letter requesting “the immediate removal of Jaffa Cakes from your biscuit exhibit”.

However, it sought to sweeten the pill by diluting the legalese with biscuit-based puns.

“We write to you today, not with crumbs of animosity, but with a full slice of firm objection,” it wrote. “Allow us to be clear: Jaffa Cakes are, in fact, cakes. Some would say the clue is in the name on the box.”

McVitie’s and the biscuit museum, officially called the Peek Frean Museum, said they were yet to agree on a resolution. The museum’s curator, Gary Magold, said, “It’s a shame – we’ve had to remove the exhibition for the moment. We’re hoping we can reach an agreement.”

The subtleties of the “is it a cake or biscuit?” debate have likely filled many a tea break but the tax law is clear: biscuits are zero-rated, but as soon as the makers start covering them with chocolate they attract 20% VAT. This wasat the heart of the Jaffa Cakescase, which came to a head in 1991.

HM Customs & Excise (the predecessor of HMRC) said they were biscuits, and that their chocolatey topping was taxable. The manufacturer McVitie’s insisted they were cakes, which are zero-rated. It won, and those smashing orangey bits can be enjoyed tax-free.

This week’s skirmish lit up social media message boards. One poster tried to shut the debate down, stating: “A biscuit goes soft when you leave it out. A cake goes hard. There’s your answer.”

Others questioned whether there was a darker subtext. “They just want to hide how much the thing have [sic] shrunk – shrinkflation strikes again.”

In recent years Jaffa Cake fans have faced diminishing returns. Not only has the number in the box reduced but two years ago the “cakes” shrank in size from 5.5cm to 5cm across. The orange bump became smaller, too.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian