Criminals in England and Wales face sanctions for refusing to attend sentencing

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"New Sanctions for Criminals Refusing Sentencing Attendance Introduced in England and Wales"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Criminals in England and Wales who refuse to attend their sentencing hearings will face tougher sanctions under a new legislative proposal aimed at ensuring accountability in the justice system. Judges will now have the authority to impose additional prison time, up to two years, on offenders who attempt to evade their sentencing. This includes those whose disruptive behavior leads to their removal from the courtroom. The measures, part of the government's victims and courts bill, will extend to all cases in the crown court, marking a significant step towards enhancing the rights of victims and ensuring that offenders confront the consequences of their actions. High-profile cases, such as that of Thomas Cashman, who was sentenced for the murder of nine-year-old Olivia Pratt-Korbel, have highlighted the issue of offenders not appearing in court, prompting calls for legislative changes to compel attendance at sentencing hearings.

In addition to imposing longer sentences for non-attendance, the new bill includes provisions to restrict parental rights for child sex offenders, preventing them from interfering in their children's lives. The measures have received support from various advocacy groups, including the NSPCC, which emphasizes the need for a comprehensive approach to improve support for victims and survivors of crime. The victims' commissioner for England and Wales, Helen Newlove, has also endorsed the reforms, stating that they provide essential oversight and accountability in how agencies respond to antisocial behavior. The proposed legislation underscores the commitment to reforming the justice system to ensure that victims feel heard and supported, while also holding offenders accountable for their actions during the legal process.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights new measures being introduced in England and Wales to address the issue of criminals refusing to attend their sentencing hearings. This legislative change aims to enforce stricter penalties on offenders who avoid their legal responsibilities, emphasizing the importance of accountability in the justice system.

Motivation Behind the Article

The news serves to inform the public and policymakers about the government's commitment to ensuring that offenders face the consequences of their actions. By showcasing high-profile cases where criminals have refused to attend sentencing, the article aims to rally support for the proposed sanctions, emphasizing the emotional impact on victims and their families.

Public Sentiment and Perception

The narrative aims to evoke a sense of justice and empathy for victims, portraying the new measures as a necessary step to uphold the dignity of the legal process. By referencing specific cases, the article seeks to create a collective outrage against offenders who exhibit disrespect toward the court and victims’ families.

Potential Omissions

There is a possibility that the article glosses over broader systemic issues within the justice system, such as the reasons behind offenders' behaviors, including mental health issues or the conditions within the prison system. This could lead to a one-dimensional view of the problem while neglecting deeper societal concerns.

Manipulative Aspects

The article may be seen as somewhat manipulative due to its emotive language and focus on sensational cases, which could lead readers to overlook the complexities of the criminal justice system. The framing of the offenders as inherently disrespectful plays into a narrative that might not consider the full context of their actions.

Comparison with Other News

When compared to other recent news articles on crime and justice, this one aligns with a growing trend of tougher stances on crime, particularly in response to public outcry over high-profile criminal cases. This may reflect a political strategy to demonstrate a proactive approach to law and order.

Impact on Society and Politics

The introduction of these measures could significantly influence public opinion on crime and punishment, potentially increasing support for harsher penalties. Politically, it may bolster the government's image as tough on crime, appealing to constituents who prioritize safety and justice.

Community Support

This news is likely to resonate with communities that have experienced violence or crime directly, particularly those advocating for victims' rights. It aims to address concerns from families affected by crime, offering them a sense of agency in the judicial process.

Economic and Market Implications

While this news may not have direct implications for the stock market, it could influence investments in sectors related to law enforcement, security, and criminal justice reforms. Companies providing technology or services to the prison system or law enforcement may see increased interest due to potential changes in policy.

Global Context

On a broader scale, the article reflects ongoing debates about criminal justice reforms worldwide. It underscores the global context of how societies are grappling with crime and punishment, resonating with current global discussions on justice and rehabilitation.

Use of AI in Writing

It is possible that AI tools were used in crafting the article, particularly in structuring the content and emphasizing key points. The style appears to be aimed at engaging a wide audience, highlighting specific cases to drive home the emotional impact. However, the underlying complexity of the topic may be simplified in the process.

Analysis of Manipulation

The language used in the article, focusing on emotionally charged cases and the consequences of offenders' actions, could be viewed as a form of manipulation. This technique serves to galvanize public support for the proposed laws while potentially overshadowing the nuances of individual cases.

The article provides a clear perspective on an important issue but may lack depth regarding the implications of such measures. The information presented is factual, supported by recent events, but it is framed in a way that could sway public opinion towards a more punitive view of justice.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Criminals who refuse to attend their sentencing face segregation in prison cells and longer time in jail under new powers handed to judges.

Tougher sanctions acrossEnglandand Wales will include confinement to cells and less time in the gym among measures to be introduced to parliament on Wednesday.

The development comes after recently convicted criminals in high-profile cases have refused to attend sentencing hearings and victim impact statements.

The measures will be introduced in the government’s victims and courts bill, which also extends the eligibility to all cases in the crown court. This means that all offenders who attempt to evade sentencing hearings could be subject to the sanctions as well as up to two more years behind bars.

Offenders who have been ordered by a judge to attend but whose disruptive and disrespectful behaviour results in their removal from the courtroom will also be punishable by the same sanctions.

Keir Starmer promised to continue the pledge to change the law, first made by his predecessor, Rishi Sunak, when he met the mother of murdered nine-year-old Olivia Pratt-Korbel.

Cheryl Korbel and her family have campaigned to change the law so that offenders are compelled to appear in the dock for sentencing.

Thomas Cashman, the gunman who killed Olivia as he chased a drug dealer who had tried to run into her home in Knotty Ash, Liverpool,did not appear in courtto hear his life sentence in April 2023.

Earlier this year, triple crossbow and knife killer Kyle Clifford refused to attend his sentencing where he received a whole life order in March.

The Southport child murderer Axel Rudakubana refused to leave his cell for hearings in February, and avoided facing victims’ families as he was removed from his hearing for repeatedly shouting in January.

Last year, Lucy Letby told the trial judge through her legal team that she would not appear in court for the remainder of the proceedings after she was found guilty of murdering seven babies.

In December 2022, Jordan McSweeney, the killer of Zara Aleena, refused to attend as he was jailed for life and ordered to serve a minimum of 38 years. Aleena’s family described his no-show as “a slap in the face”.

Under the new legislation, judges will be given the power to sentence offenders for up to two more years in prison for avoiding facing justice.

For those who already face lengthy imprisonment or whole life orders, judges could also impose a range of prison punishments on offenders such as confinement to their cells and stripping them of privileges such as time in the prison gym.

The bill will restrict parental responsibility from child sex offenders who committed serious crimes against their own child to boost protection for victims.

The move will stop them being able to ask for updates on their child’s schooling or trying to interfere in their life.

Under the bill, the victims’ commissioner will be required to produce an independent report on whether agencies are meeting their statutory duty over the victim’s code, in a bid to further hold the government to account.

Helen Newlove said the reforms were important. The victims’ commissioner for England andWalessaid: “Crucially, it introduces much needed oversight and accountability to how agencies respond to antisocial behaviour – an area where victims have too often felt unheard and unsupported.”

Judges can make an order for a defendant to appear, and refusing the judge’s order can result in prosecution under the Contempt of Court Act. But Ministry of Justice officials say they are only aware of one example in a decade of a judge doing this.

Shabana Mahmood said: “This bill will deliver long overdue reforms to ensure victims see justice done and are given the vital support they need as they rebuild their lives.”

The child protection charity NSPCC backed the move, hoping it will lead to improvements in how young victims and survivors are treated and receive the support they are entitled to, but said it was “not a complete solution”.

Sam Whyte of the NSPCC said: “These measures must be part of broader efforts to create a truly accountable criminal justice system.

“That must include government using the upcoming comprehensive spending review to commit the considerable investment needed in specific support for victims and survivors of child sexual abuse, so that every child can access the support they need, where and when they need it.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian