Credit Suisse was ‘warned’ about Greensill three years before firm collapsed

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Credit Suisse Received Warnings About Greensill Capital Three Years Prior to Collapse"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Credit Suisse executives were alerted about potential risks linked to their dealings with Greensill Capital as early as 2018, according to a report by the Swiss financial regulator Finma. The anonymous warnings, which questioned the judgment of senior managers, highlighted concerns over the bank's strategy of packaging loans from Greensill into investment funds worth $10 billion for wealthy clients. This warning came in the context of Greensill's business practices, which were under scrutiny due to their ties to troubled companies within Sanjeev Gupta's steel empire. As the investigation unfolded, Finma noted that these concerns were reiterated up until June 2019, painting a picture of a bank that ignored repeated cautionary advice. Despite these warnings, Credit Suisse continued its partnership with Greensill, which contributed to significant financial fallout when Greensill Capital collapsed in March 2021 after its insurers refused to renew contracts supporting its loans.

The fallout from Greensill's collapse was profound for Credit Suisse, resulting in the closure of its $10 billion Greensill-backed funds and leaving investors with substantial losses. This situation prompted a near two-year investigation by Finma, which ultimately concluded that Credit Suisse had “seriously breached its supervisory obligations.” As a consequence, the bank faced increased oversight regarding its senior management and critical business relationships. The findings of this investigation were made public shortly before Credit Suisse itself collapsed in March 2023, leading to its emergency acquisition by UBS. UBS has since attempted to recover funds for the investors affected by the Greensill-backed Credit Suisse funds, emphasizing that the issues highlighted in the Finma report were legacies of Credit Suisse's prior management. The report sheds light on the complex financial dealings and the eventual repercussions of inadequate risk assessment within major financial institutions.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article sheds light on the warnings received by Credit Suisse regarding its dealings with Greensill Capital prior to its collapse. It indicates a failure in risk management and decision-making on the part of the Swiss bank's leadership. This narrative may serve multiple purposes, including holding the bank accountable and highlighting systemic failures within financial institutions.

Implications of Warnings

The report from the Swiss regulator Finma reveals that Credit Suisse executives were informed about concerns related to their association with Greensill Capital as early as 2018. This raises questions about the bank’s due diligence and its adherence to internal and external warnings. The implications of ignoring such warnings could point towards negligence or a lack of adequate risk assessment protocols.

Public Perception

This article is likely aimed at bolstering public scrutiny of Credit Suisse and the broader banking sector. By emphasizing the warnings and the eventual collapse, it seeks to shape public opinion on the reliability and integrity of financial institutions. This could lead to increased calls for regulatory reforms and more stringent oversight of banking practices.

Potential Concealments

While the article focuses on the past warnings, it could also introduce an agenda to divert attention from other pressing issues within the financial system. It raises the question of whether there are other underlying problems that may be obscured by the focus on Credit Suisse’s dealings with Greensill Capital.

Manipulative Elements

The framing of the article leans towards a narrative of negligence and irresponsibility, which could be interpreted as a form of manipulation. By spotlighting the warnings and the bank's eventual downfall, it creates a moral imperative for accountability among financial leaders.

Trustworthiness of the News

The reliability of the information can be considered high, given that it is based on a report from a regulatory body (Finma) and corroborated by anonymous sources within the bank. However, the selective presentation of facts could still indicate an intention to push a specific narrative.

Connections to Other News

This article connects to broader discussions about financial regulation, corporate governance, and the responsibilities of banks. It may resonate with other news stories focusing on corporate malfeasance or failures in risk management across various sectors.

Societal and Economic Impact

The fallout from this situation could lead to increased regulatory scrutiny not only for Credit Suisse but also for other financial institutions. This could reshape investor confidence and potentially impact stock prices, especially for firms engaged in similar financial practices.

Target Audience

The article likely appeals to investors, financial analysts, and the general public who are concerned about the integrity of financial institutions. It provides an opportunity for these groups to engage in discussions about accountability and reform in the banking sector.

Market Reactions

This news may influence market sentiment, particularly among investors in financial services. Stocks associated with Credit Suisse and other banks that have similar exposure to risky investments could see increased volatility.

Global Context

The issues raised in this article reflect ongoing concerns about corporate governance and financial stability worldwide. As financial markets grapple with the implications of past crises, this narrative aligns with broader themes of accountability in the financial sector.

Possibility of AI Influence

While it is less likely that AI was directly involved in the writing of this article, the structured presentation and analysis of facts suggest that AI tools could have assisted in data organization or fact-checking. However, the critical judgment and narrative framing appear to be human-driven.

The article provides significant insights into the challenges faced by financial institutions and raises critical questions about accountability and transparency in the banking sector.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Bosses atCredit Suissewere warned against dealing with the Australian financier Lex Greensill’s eponymous company three years before the collapse of his Greensill Capital, which once employed the former UK prime minister David Cameron as an adviser.

The “character judgment” of senior Credit Suisse managers was challenged in anonymous messages they received as early as 2018, which raised concerns over the Swiss bank’s dealings withGreensill, according to a report by the Swiss regulator Finma, released under a London court order after a request by the Guardian and other media.

The document showed senior managers were warned several times about the risks involved in its business dealings with Greensill and his firm, the 2021 collapse of whichcontributed to Credit Suisse’s shocking demisein March 2023.

A message from an anonymous tipster raised “strong doubts” over the bank’s strategy of packaging up Greensill’s loans into $10bn (£7.4bn) worth of investable funds for wealthy clients.

Greensillappeared at the high court in London this weekas a witness in a month-long trial, in which a former Credit Suisse fund is suing the Japanese tech investor SoftBank for $440m over a complex deal it allegedly coordinated with Greensill Capital before its collapse.

The Finma report, released as part of the trial, detailed the messages sent to Credit Suisse managers. “We also have serious doubts about your character judgment in choosing Greensill Capital as a partner in this field, and even more so in giving them the degree of discretion over your clients’ money which they appear to have,” the message said. The tipster was also concerned that a “large proportion” of those loans were tocompanies in the metals magnate Sanjeev Gupta’s troubled steel empire.

The message added that the recent collapse of another set of Greensill-backed funds offered by rival asset manager GAM “should be taken as a strong warning … you need to take care”.

One senior manager forwarded the 2018 tipoff to Lex Greensill, adding: “People in CS are receiving anonymous mails … seriously, you have to rethink your communication strategy!”

Greensill Capital, founded in 2011, offered corporate loans, giving companies advances on their invoices in exchange for a fee. But its founder, the Australian melon farmer turned City banker, entered into a series of complex financial agreements and marketed his lender as a tech firm stacked with high-profile advisers including Cameron.

Greensill went on to attract a series of large investors including General Atlantic and SoftBank, whose investments were purportedly meant to expand Greensill’s activities.

“However, as it later turned out, these funds were primarily used to pay out private investors and to provide Greensill Bank, which was increasingly coming under regulatory scrutiny, with additional capital,” the Finma report stated. “Under the management of Lex Greensill, the company provide[d] customised suits for its employees, elegant business premises and its own fleet of business jets.”

Finma’s report, which was compiled in December 2022 after nearly two years of investigations, showed Credit Suisse bosses continued to receive warnings over their dealings with Greensill as late as June 2019.

Greensill was, at the time, still on the rise and had hoped to launcha £22bn stock market flotationbefore the Covid pandemic put its clients and investors under severe financial strain.

Sign up toBusiness Today

Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning

after newsletter promotion

Greensill eventually collapsed in March 2021, after insurers refused to renew contracts that underpinned its loans. It came amid growing concern over the firm’s management and its outsized exposure to Gupta’s metals empire, which ultimately sparked astring of financial and political scandals.

It forced Credit Suisse to close its $10bn Greensill-backed funds, leaving wealthy customers nursing hundreds of millions of dollars worth of losses and further eroding confidence in Credit Suisse. That led the Swiss regulator, Finma, to launch what became a near two-year investigation into its dealings with Greensill.

The full resulting Finma report was never previously released. But key findings, released in February 2023, declared that Credit Suisse “seriously breached its supervisory obligations” and would face additional oversight for senior managers and important business relationships. The 167-year-old bank collapsed a month later, leading to its emergency rescue by rival UBS.

UBS is still trying to recoup money for former investors of the Greensill-backed Credit Suisse funds.

Commenting on the Finma report, UBS said: “This is a legacy Credit Suisse matter. The conduct described in the report pre-dates UBS’s acquisition of Credit Suisse.”

A representative for Lex Greensill declined to comment.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian