Clown in a Cornfield review – perky yet run-of-the-mill slasher fare

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Clown in a Cornfield: A Conventional Slasher Lacking Distinction"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.7
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The film "Clown in a Cornfield," which premiered at SXSW and has generated buzz through special screenings and a wide release, ultimately falls short of its hype. The movie, picked up by Shudder, seems better suited for a small screen debut rather than a theatrical release. This is particularly evident when compared to the success of last year's "Terrifier 3," which grossed $90 million on a modest budget. While that film is characterized by its extreme gore and a rebellious spirit, "Clown in a Cornfield" opts for a more conventional slasher format, lacking the sense of genuine danger that defines more impactful horror films. Viewers are treated to a familiar narrative, featuring a smart girl named Quinn who relocates to a small town, where she encounters the titular clown, Frendo, a sinister twist on the town's former mascot, now armed with a chainsaw and intent on terrorizing her and her friends.

The film attempts to modernize the classic slasher formula, incorporating elements like smartphone culture and a diverse cast of characters, including a love triangle among high schoolers. However, much of the film feels mechanical and predictable, with a lack of character depth that prevents audiences from forming a connection to the protagonists. The climax introduces a surprising queer twist that adds a layer of thematic novelty, but it is muddied by convoluted explanations that detract from its impact. Ultimately, while "Clown in a Cornfield" offers some appreciated updates to the genre, it struggles to distinguish itself among a plethora of horror offerings, resulting in a film that is neither memorable nor particularly remarkable. Despite the presence of a clown in the cornfield, the film leaves audiences wanting more substance and innovation.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The review of "Clown in a Cornfield" presents a critical perspective on the film's reception and its place within the crowded slasher genre. It highlights the disconnect between the film's marketing and its actual content, suggesting that the film may not live up to the hype created around it.

Expectation vs. Reality

There was considerable anticipation surrounding "Clown in a Cornfield," fueled by its premiere at SXSW and a subsequent marketing push that positioned it as a new horror icon. However, the review suggests that the film does not offer anything innovative or particularly engaging, describing it as a "run-of-the-mill slasher" that lacks the tension and creativity found in more successful horror films. This contrast between expectations and reality points to an attempt to manage audience perceptions, possibly to temper disappointment.

Cinematic Context

The film's release strategy seems to be influenced by the surprising success of other horror films, particularly "Terrifier 3." The review implies that "Clown in a Cornfield" is part of a trend where lesser horror films are being pushed into the mainstream market, possibly to capitalize on current audience trends without delivering substantive content. This raises questions about the motivations of distributors and whether they are prioritizing profit over quality.

Cultural Commentary

The article points to a cultural commentary embedded in the film, with references to classic slasher tropes and the idea of nostalgia for 80s horror films. However, the review argues that this self-awareness does not translate into an engaging experience for the viewer. The mention of a character recognizing their situation as being akin to an "awful 80s slasher" suggests a certain level of irony, yet it ultimately highlights the film's shortcomings rather than elevating it.

Audience Engagement

The film seems aimed at young adult audiences, particularly those who enjoy horror but might not be looking for anything too intense or groundbreaking. The review indicates that while "Clown in a Cornfield" may attract viewers due to its marketing, it may fail to retain them due to its lack of substance.

Industry Implications

The review hints at broader implications for the horror genre and film industry. The trend of promoting mediocre films in hopes of financial success may lead to audience fatigue with the genre. If viewers consistently find that marketed films do not deliver on their promises, it could impact box office returns and the overall perception of horror films in the future.

The analysis suggests that while the film may be entertaining on a superficial level, it lacks depth and innovation. The review does not indicate any hidden agendas or manipulative intent, but rather a critique of marketing practices in the film industry that prioritize financial gain over artistic integrity.

In conclusion, the review presents a largely negative view of "Clown in a Cornfield," emphasizing its shortcomings and the potential consequences for the horror genre.

Unanalyzed Article Content

One would be forgiven for assuming there was a lot more to early summer slasher Clown in a Cornfield other than, well, a clown in a cornfield. Because ever since an inevitable premiere atSXSWin March, an impressively maintained buzz has followed – special drive-in screenings, an ambitiously wide release, the bullish positioning of a New Horror Icon – giving us enough naive hope that in an overcrowded genre (there’s estimated to be double the amount of wide release horrors this year compared to 2024), this one might be worthy of the hype.

But the film, which was picked up by ever-growing horror streamer Shudder at the end of last year, would have been a wiser choice for a small screen premiere, a late-night weekend couch watch that feels a little too modest for the multiplex. The expansive rollout will likely have been triggered by the surprise success of last year’s Art the Clown sequelTerrifier 3, which made a staggering $90m worldwide from a $2m budget (it was released the month before Clown in a Cornfield was purchased). As small and junky as those films might be, they’re distinguished by a throughline of ghoulishly inventive ultra-gore, a throwback to the kind of video nasty violence that would worry and repulse parents, the act of seeing the films then carrying with it an air of juvenile rebellion.

There’s nothing here to warrant such concern, no real sense of danger to be conjured, Clown in a Cornfield content to be a perfectly watchable, if mostly mechanical, production line slasher. “It’s like we’re in some awful 80s slasher horror movie!” one of the anonymous sub-Scream characters says at one point. Yes whatever your name is, it really is!

It’s based on Adam Cesare’s YA novel from 2020, centered on a classic subgenre archetype – the smart dark-haired girl with a dead mum – as she moves to a new town with father (Hannibal’s Aaron Abrams). Quinn (Katie Douglas, giving young Cristin Milioti energy) is, of course, loathed to relocate from the big city of Philadelphia to the small town of Kettle Springs, a rural dead zone haunted by the reminder of what it once was, when its corn syrup factory brought employment and business to the townsfolk. But she soon finds herself a tribe – a group of rule-breaking YouTubing high schoolers – and a slowly evolving love triangle between a gruff kid from the wrong side of the tracks and the well-to-do son of the mayor.

There is, however, aclown in a cornfield, ready to ruin her fun.

The clown is named Frendo, a bastardisation of the town’s one-time mascot, this time far less friendly and far more carrying a chainsaw. It’s a character the teens have been using in their prank videos, faking attacks that have made them a target of the fatigued sheriff. But now, Frendo is real and he’s picking them off one by one, in and out of the cornfield.

There aresomeappreciated tweaks to the formula here, attempts to update what could have easily just been an “80s slasher horror movie” but with smartphones. But they mostly come within a busy last act, a little too late, given how run-of-the-mill the majority of the film before that can be. The script, from Carter Blanchard and director Eli Craig, might have its roots in YA but the characters are as weakly etched and indistinguishable as they would be in any other old sleepover slasher. It’s only really in that final act when the we can see the source material, in a neat and genuinely surprising queer twist far more interesting and subversive than anything related to the cut-and-paste lead.

The big reveal, while illogically daft, does have a certain on-paper thematic novelty to it but it’s cursedly both over-explained and hard-to-really-understand, a “why are you doing this?” response that rambles into nonsense. Perhaps the majority of Friday night teens aren’t going to Clown in a Cornfield for plot specifics but even as a more base slasher, it just doesn’t have enough to make it remarkable. Frendo is just some clown, never given all that much to separate him from the many other horror clowns we know better, and while the deaths are certainly grisly, they’re interchangeable.

There’s definitely a clown in that cornfield but there’s precious little else.

Clown in a Cornfield is out in US and UK cinemas on 9 May

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian