Chilavert, choripán and children: a night with Argentina’s champions

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Vélez Sarsfield Faces Challenges Amidst Buenos Aires Football Rivalries"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The recent Superclásico match between River Plate and Boca Juniors in Buenos Aires attracted an impressive 85,000 fans to the Estadio Monumental, showcasing the city's deep-rooted football culture. However, a different experience awaited those looking to attend matches at lesser-known clubs, such as Vélez Sarsfield, which boasts a passionate local fanbase yet struggles with ticket availability and matchday logistics. With both Boca and River Plate possessing over 340,000 members, securing a ticket to their matches is a challenge, often requiring purchase through expensive third-party vendors. In contrast, Vélez Sarsfield, the reigning champions, offers a more accessible alternative, even if their recent form has not inspired confidence among fans. Despite the club's proud history and notable alumni like World Cup winner Nicolás Otamendi and legendary goalkeeper José Luis Chilavert, the current season has seen a decline in performance, with the stadium often half-full during games.

On the day of the match against Sarmiento, the atmosphere was subdued, with only 45,000 of the 45,000 seats filled at the José Amalfitani Stadium. Local fan Daniel, who supports Boca, shared his experiences of navigating the intense rivalry and the safety precautions that accompany it, including a ban on away fans and restrictions on alcohol sales within the stadium. As the game unfolded, the quality of play resembled that of England's Championship, lacking the finesse seen in top-tier football. The match culminated in a disappointing 1-0 loss for Vélez, marked by a missed penalty that epitomized their struggles this season. The evening ended with a deflated inflatable fort symbolizing the club's fading hopes of retaining their title, leaving fans to ponder where the legendary Chilavert was when they needed him most.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article provides an engaging glimpse into the football culture in Buenos Aires, specifically focusing on the experiences surrounding a match between River Plate and Boca Juniors. It contrasts this with a more intimate experience of attending a game at Vélez Sarsfield, highlighting the challenges faced by fans in securing tickets to matches of the two larger clubs.

Cultural Context and Fan Experience

The narrative captures the essence of Argentine football, particularly the intense rivalry between Boca Juniors and River Plate, which is emblematic of the country's footballing heritage. The mention of the Superclásico, a highly anticipated match, sets the stage for the passionate atmosphere associated with these games. However, the author’s personal experience at Vélez Sarsfield emphasizes a more grassroots approach to football, showcasing a different side of local fandom that is often overshadowed by the prominence of Boca and River.

Challenges of Ticket Acquisition

The article discusses the logistical challenges fans face when trying to attend matches. With a membership system that prioritizes long-standing fans, the difficulty in purchasing tickets reflects the exclusivity often found in top-tier football clubs. This could potentially alienate casual fans and tourists, suggesting a divide in accessibility to Argentine football culture. The high prices charged by third-party sellers further complicate matters, indicating a commercialization of the sport that may not resonate well with local supporters.

Local Pride vs. Globalization

Vélez Sarsfield's commitment to nurturing local talent and its disdain for the international tourist influx at Boca and River Plate highlights a theme of local pride in the face of globalization. This sentiment is important as it can foster a sense of community and belonging among local fans, contrasting sharply with the commercialization that larger clubs experience. The mention of notable players like Nicolás Otamendi and José Luis Chilavert reinforces this narrative of homegrown talent, suggesting that clubs like Vélez can still thrive on their local roots.

Potential for Societal Impact

The article's portrayal of Buenos Aires' football culture could influence public sentiment towards local clubs versus larger, more commercialized entities. This could encourage a resurgence of support for clubs like Vélez Sarsfield, promoting a more community-oriented approach to football. The discussion around ticket accessibility and local pride may also resonate with broader social themes of inclusion and community engagement in sports.

Reliability and Manipulation

The article appears to present a genuine perspective on the Argentine football experience, particularly from the viewpoint of a local fan. It does not overtly manipulate the narrative but rather sheds light on the complexities faced by fans. While the author's choice of words may evoke certain emotions, the analysis remains grounded in personal experience rather than sensationalism. Therefore, the reliability of this narrative is relatively high, as it reflects real challenges and sentiments within the football community.

Unanalyzed Article Content

When imagining a football match in Buenos Aires many fans visualise La Bombonera shuddering to its foundations by the jumping mass of blue and yellow Boca Juniors supporters or the majestic Estadio Monumental bedecked in streams of ticker tape when hosting Argentina’s victory in the World Cup final in 1978. Last Sunday, the Monumental was at full capacity as 85,000 fans watched River Plate beat Boca 2-1 in a tense Superclásico. However, a few weeks ago my experience of going to a football match in Buenos Aires was very different indeed.

As I discovered when planning my trip to Buenos Aires, gaining admission to one of the Argentinian capital’s largest clubs, such as Boca or River Plate, is by no means straightforward. Both clubs have significant numbers of members,with more than 340,000 each (only Real Madrid have more). Thesesocioshave priority when it comes to buying tickets so there is limited availability. One of the only ways to buy tickets in advance is through a third party, who charge $150 upwards. Kick-off times are only announced a week or so in advance, which makes life even more complicated.

Fortunately, there are plenty of other clubs in Buenos Aires, with more than 20 in the greater metropolitan area, eight of which are in the Primera División this season. I plumped for the reigning champions, Vélez Sarsfield, a club that is very proud of its local fanbase. One of their regular chants is focused on how they are not like Boca or River Plate, who attract swathes of international tourists and a fair degree of scorn from Vélez fans. The club motto – “The first to be a great club” – also reinforces their traditions.

The club is proud of its homegrown talent, with World Cup winner Nicolás Otamendi one of their best known academy products. Otamendi joined Vélez when he was seven and progressed to the first team before moving to Porto. The famous Paraguayan goalkeeper José Luis Chilavert played for Vélez Sarsfield in the 1990s. Chilavert scored around 40 goals for the club, a remarkable record that was the result of him not only taking penalties but also being adept at scoring direct free-kicks.

Through a combination of factors, the match against Sarmiento was a low-key affair, with the 45,000-capacity stadium barely half full. It was scheduled at 9.15pm on a Monday night; Vélez had been in poor form; and this was very much a mid-table clash, with Sarmiento not the most glamorous of opponents. Despite the relatively sparse crowd, there were phalanxes of heavily armed police in attendance as the spectators filed through a variety of security checks before entering the José Amalfitani Stadium. Like most Argentinian grounds, there is terracing at both ends and it felt a little odd to be standing at a top-flight match for the first time in decades.

We attended the game with local fan Daniel, who supports Boca and had to wear a long-sleeved shirt to hide his tattoos. “At another ground a few months ago I was identified by one of the home fans as a Boca supporter and was told to be very careful and warned that I should never return.” He also explained that he no longer attends matches at La Bombonera as, during one of the many economic crises that Argentinians have suffered in the last decade, he briefly stopped paying his monthly membership and was excluded, to be placed on a very long waiting list to return.

Vélez are based in the suburb of Liniers, which is a 30-minute bus ride from the city centre. Daniel took us to a fairly shabby social club just outside the stadium for a pre-match beer andchoripán(chorizo sausage in a bap). There is no alcohol allowed inside the ground because of crowd trouble in the past. There is also a total ban on away fans, which leads to a slightly surreal atmosphere inside the stadium, with none of the usual ebb and flow between opposing supporters that generates so much of the energy and spark in English football.

We stood next to the ultras who were positioned under the streamers that stretched from the top of the terracing all the way down to the pitchside fences. The support was steadfast, chanting almost continuously throughout the game even though Vélez did not create a great deal to get excited about. The standard of football was akin to the Championship in England, with plenty of effort and the odd dash of skill, but not much finesse and a distinct lack of goalmouth action.

It was a surprise to see so many young children in attendance, especially considering the game finished after 11pm on a weekday. There were a fair few precariously perched in their prams on the steep steps of the dark blue terracing. Some of the older children were held up by parents, with their faces right up against the perimeter fence.

Vélez’s stadium is known asEl Fortín (the Small Fort) but this season the ramparts have been breached so many times that the fans seemed a little subdued, almost resigned to their fate. When they won the title last season they were undefeated at home; this season they have played eight home matches, won two of them and scored just two goals in 720 minutes of football.

The game was drifting towards a goalless draw before the Sarmiento substitute Franco Frías scored from close range with 20 minutes remaining. It was greeted by near silence apart from the whistling of the ultras combined with shouts of delight from the Sarmiento players who were joined in their celebrations on the pitch by all the substitutes in the absence of any away fans.

Vélez were handed a lifeline in added time when they were awarded a penalty for a handball. There followed an interminable delay for the spot-kick to be taken as Sarmiento players protested and the referee spent ages checking everything was ready. While waiting for the referee’s whistle, the veteran striker Michael Santos lost patience and tucked the ball into the corner. To howls of derision he was ordered to retake it and, almost inevitably, his second effort was not so successful. He blasted it over the bar and the host’s 1-0 loss was rubber-stamped, extending their lamentable home record.

In keeping with the stadium’s name, and maybe as an alternative bouncy castle for the massed ranks of children attending, an inflatable fort was used as a tunnel to usher the players off the pitch. As the fans drifted disconsolately away into the night, the fort was symbolically deflated along with any faint hopes of retaining their title. Where was Chilavert when they needed him?

This is an article byRichard Foster, the writer behindThe Football Mineand the host of the podcastIt Started With A Kick.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian