Cheat: Unfinished Business review – the single worst show that has ever been created

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Netflix's Cheat: Unfinished Business Criticized as One of the Worst Reality Shows"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 4.5
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The Netflix series Cheat: Unfinished Business, hosted by Amanda Holden, has been critically panned and is described as one of the worst shows in television history. It should not be confused with the previous 2023 gameshow Cheat, which was also poorly received. The reality show features eight former couples who reconvene in a luxury villa to confront their past relationships marred by infidelity. The format combines elements of reality television and relationship counseling, but it has been criticized for its lack of genuine drama and emotional depth. Viewers may find the premise grim, as the show encourages contestants to either reconcile, engage in conflict, or pursue romantic interests behind their exes' backs. Holden's dual role as a concerned host during the day and a glamorous figure at night has also drawn negative attention, as her contributions seem superficial at best.

Despite the overall critique, Paul C Brunson, the show's relationship coach, offers some redeeming qualities with his professional insights into the contestants' behaviors. However, the show struggles to maintain viewer engagement, with episodes often lacking significant developments or compelling emotional moments. While it aims to evoke strong reactions akin to other reality shows, it falls short, leaving audiences with little more than mundane interactions and occasional sobbing. The lack of impactful drama results in a viewing experience that is described as unforgivably boring. Ultimately, Cheat: Unfinished Business may receive a one-star rating for its technical execution, but it fails to deliver any entertainment value, leading to the recommendation that potential viewers should avoid wasting their time on this series.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The review of "Cheat: Unfinished Business" presents a scathing critique of the show, highlighting its perceived lack of quality and depth. The author uses exaggerated language to convey their disdain, which raises questions about the underlying motives and implications of such a strong stance.

Intent Behind the Review

The article seems to serve both as an entertainment critique and a cautionary tale for viewers regarding the type of reality television being produced. By labeling it the "single worst thing that has ever been created," the author aims to engage readers emotionally, likely to spark discussions around media consumption and the quality of reality shows. The extreme negativity may also reflect broader cultural concerns about the direction of entertainment.

Public Perception

This review may shape public perception by labeling the show as an embodiment of everything wrong with modern reality television. It could foster a sense of superiority among viewers who choose not to engage with such programming, thereby creating an in-group/out-group dynamic concerning media choices.

Information Omission

While the critique is thorough, it may gloss over any redeeming qualities the show could have, such as potential entertainment value or the possibility that some viewers might enjoy it. This selective portrayal could serve to manipulate public opinion by presenting a one-sided view.

Manipulative Elements

The review employs strong emotional language and hyperbole to influence readers' perceptions. The criticism of Amanda Holden’s role and the comparison to other shows like "Jeremy Kyle" and "Love Island" suggests a strategic choice to evoke strong reactions and align the show with negative connotations.

Reality of the Content

While the review provides a strong opinion, it lacks a balanced view of the show’s concept and execution. The existence of a relationship coach, for example, could imply that the show does aim to provide some level of insight, which is not explored in depth.

Comparison with Other Media

When compared to other media critiques, this review stands out for its intensity and lack of nuance. It reflects a growing trend where media outlets take a hard stance against certain types of programming, potentially influencing other reviews and public sentiment about reality television as a whole.

Industry Image

The publication of such a review may contribute to a broader narrative about the decline of quality in reality television. This could be part of an industry pattern where sensationalized content is critiqued, which might affect how future shows are produced and marketed.

Potential Societal Impact

The ongoing discourse around reality TV, spurred by critiques like this, could lead to a greater demand for higher-quality programming, potentially influencing production decisions in the television industry. Viewers may also become more discerning about the media they consume, leading to shifts in viewing habits.

Target Audience

The review likely resonates with audiences who are critical of reality television trends, particularly those who appreciate more substantive content. It may appeal to individuals who value entertainment that provokes thought rather than merely sensationalism.

Market Influence

While this specific review may not have a direct impact on stock markets or financial trends, it reflects a cultural shift that could affect the entertainment industry’s profitability. Companies that produce low-quality reality shows might face backlash, influencing stock performance indirectly.

Geopolitical Context

Although the review does not directly relate to geopolitical issues, it highlights cultural attitudes that can reflect broader societal values. The focus on entertainment quality may resonate with ongoing discussions about cultural production in the context of global media.

AI Involvement

It is unlikely that artificial intelligence played a direct role in writing this review, but certain language patterns and structures might suggest automated assistance. The tone and style appear distinctly human, aimed at provoking strong emotional responses rather than delivering a neutral analysis.

Conclusion

The review of "Cheat: Unfinished Business" is steeped in hyperbole and emotional rhetoric, reflecting a broader cultural critique of reality television. It effectively evokes strong reactions, yet it risks oversimplifying a complex media landscape. The review’s reliability hinges on its subjective viewpoint, and while it articulates valid criticisms, it may not present the full picture of the show's potential appeal.

Unanalyzed Article Content

First, an important point of order. The new Netflix television series Cheat: Unfinished Business should not be confused with the Netflix television series Cheat. The latter was a 2023 gameshow hosted by Danny Dyer, notable for being forgettably bad. The former is a 2025 reality show hosted byAmanda Holden, notable for being the single worst thing that has ever been created in the history of humankind.

You might think this is an exaggeration, but that’s only because you haven’t just watched four episodes of Cheat: Unfinished Business in a row, and haven’t found yourself involuntarily clawing at your eyes in a doomed bid to injure any part of your brain that might remember watching it. I have. Quite frankly it’s a wonder I can still type.

Best described as a mutant cross between Jeremy Kyle and Love Island, Cheat: Unfinished Business is a reality show where eight former couples, whose relationship ended after real or perceived infidelity, are taken to stay in a luxury villa and either a) reconcile, b) fight or c) get off with each other behind their exes’ backs. In other words, it’s exactly as grim as it sounds.

Holden has two roles here, depending on what time of day it is. If it’s light outside, her job is to pull a concerned face and nod whenever any of the contestants say anything emotionally vulnerable. If it’s night, she shines her legs to a high reflective sheen, puts on a see-through dress and struts backwards and forwards in slow motion while making an expression as if she were holding in a potentially catastrophic bout of gastroenteritis.

Slightly more useful is Paul C Brunson, the show’s relationship coach. As an expert in his field, Brunson is able to offer genuine insight into the behaviour of the contestants, and tools to help them fix it. And though the filming traps him in a perpetual doom-loop of TikTok glow-up filters, he may be the best thing about the show.

The point of Cheat: Unfinished Business (the colon and subtitle hinting at a wider Cheat Cinematic Universe floating about in the ether like some awful televisual night hag) depends on who you are. If you’re one of the contestants, then you ostensibly signed up to work through your relationship problems, even though you haven’t seen your former partner for months – or, in one case, years – and realistically should have started to move on by now. Also, you might be there because you are gripped by the bizarre desire to dig through the darkest and most personal moments of your life on a globally streaming television series rather than behind closed doors like a normal person, which suggests that you are at best insincere and at worst freakishly fame-hungry. At this point, it’s worth noting that some of the people here are from Love Island, so there’s a risk that they might shrivel up like a salted slug if people stop paying them attention.

On the other hand, if you’re one of the producers of the show, the point is clearly to create something emotionally manipulative enough to rival the viral clip from the Spanish reality showLa Isla de las Tentaciones, in which a man named Montoya ripped his shirt open and howled at the sky after watching live footage of his girlfriend having sex during a thunderstorm.

Sign up toWhat's On

Get the best TV reviews, news and features in your inbox every Monday

after newsletter promotion

The issue here, though, is that La Isla de las Tentaciones is a Spanish show full of people being incredibly Spanish, and Cheat: Unfinished Business is a British show about people being incredibly British. On the basis of the first four episodes, there is a comprehensive absence of drama here. Maybe a bit of sobbing. Maybe the sort of hushed “Leave him, he’s not worth it!” talk you hear outside pub toilets at half 10 on a Friday night. But that’s it. Entire episodes pass without a single thing happening. For something so desperate to be exploitative, it’s all unforgivably boring.

So, one star or zero stars? I’ve landed on the former because it isn’t entirely without merit – as far as I can tell, the cameras were all pointing the right way – but mainly because a zero-star rating suggests that this will be an entertainingly bad hate-watch. There is nothing entertaining to be found here. Don’t waste your time.

Cheat: Unfinished Business is on Netflix

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian