Carbon footprint of Israel’s war on Gaza exceeds that of many entire countries

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Study Reveals Israel's Military Actions in Gaza Produce Carbon Emissions Exceeding Those of Many Countries"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

A recent study highlights the significant environmental impact of the first 15 months of Israel's military actions in Gaza, revealing that the carbon footprint from this conflict may surpass the annual emissions of over 100 countries. The research, shared exclusively with the Guardian, estimates that the long-term climate costs associated with the destruction and subsequent rebuilding of Gaza could exceed 31 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2e). This figure is greater than the combined annual greenhouse gas emissions of Costa Rica and Estonia for 2023, illustrating the severe implications of military conflicts on global climate change. The study emphasizes that military emissions are not currently required to be reported to the United Nations climate body, which complicates accountability for the environmental costs of warfare.

The analysis further details the sources of emissions during the conflict, attributing over 99% of the estimated 1.89 million tCO2e generated between October 2023 and January 2025 to Israeli military operations. The report indicates that the majority of emissions stemmed from Israel's aerial bombardment and ground invasions, with significant contributions from the supply of military resources from the US. The destruction of infrastructure, particularly in Gaza, has led to a dire humanitarian situation, exacerbating environmental degradation and food insecurity. As Gaza's reconstruction begins, the estimated emissions from clearing debris and rebuilding essential structures could generate an additional 29.4 million tCO2e, a figure comparable to the total emissions of Afghanistan for the year 2023. This comprehensive study underscores the urgent need for accountability and the reassessment of military operations' environmental impact amidst escalating climate change concerns.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights the environmental impact of the ongoing conflict between Israel and Gaza, specifically focusing on the carbon emissions resulting from military actions. By presenting data that shows the carbon footprint of the conflict surpasses that of many countries, it aims to raise awareness of the broader implications of warfare on global climate change.

Purpose of the Article

The intent behind this publication seems to be to illuminate the environmental costs associated with military conflicts, particularly emphasizing the disproportionate impact of Israel's military actions. By comparing the emissions to those of entire countries, the article seeks to invoke a sense of urgency regarding climate change and the accountability of nations for their military emissions. This aligns with a growing movement demanding transparency and responsibility for the ecological consequences of war.

Public Perception

The article is likely aiming to foster a negative perception of Israel's military actions and to highlight the asymmetry in the conflict's environmental impact. By focusing on the overwhelming contribution of the Israeli military to the carbon footprint, it paints a picture of an aggressive military campaign that not only affects civilians but also exacerbates climate issues. This could potentially mobilize public opinion against military actions that harm the environment.

Hidden Agendas

While the article presents factual data regarding emissions, it may also serve to distract from other geopolitical issues or complexities surrounding the conflict. By emphasizing climate impact, the narrative could shift attention from immediate humanitarian concerns, such as civilian casualties and human rights violations.

Manipulative Elements

The report contains elements that could be seen as manipulative, particularly in its framing of emissions statistics. By focusing solely on Israel's military emissions and downplaying those from Hamas, it risks creating a one-sided narrative. The language used may evoke emotional responses, potentially leading to a biased understanding of the conflict's dynamics.

Reliability of Information

The research cited claims to be comprehensive, but its reliability hinges on the methodology used to estimate emissions. If the study lacks transparency in its calculations or fails to consider all factors contributing to the emissions, its conclusions may be less credible. The article's reliance on the Social Science Research Network adds a level of academic legitimacy, but further scrutiny of the study's details would be necessary to fully assess its trustworthiness.

Societal and Economic Impact

The article's revelations about the climate costs of warfare could influence public discourse on military funding and foreign policy. It may lead to increased advocacy for environmental accountability in military operations, thereby affecting political agendas and funding priorities. Additionally, the narrative may resonate with environmentally-conscious communities and activists, potentially mobilizing them for advocacy efforts.

Audience Engagement

The content is likely to appeal to activists, environmentalists, and those concerned about the humanitarian implications of warfare. By framing the issue in terms of climate change, it aims to engage a broader audience who may not be directly invested in the geopolitical aspects of the conflict.

Market Implications

In terms of financial markets, this article could influence sectors such as defense and energy. Companies involved in military contracts may face scrutiny regarding their environmental impact, leading to potential shifts in investment strategies. Additionally, firms focused on renewable energy may see increased interest as the conversation around climate accountability grows.

Geopolitical Relevance

The article underscores the intersection of military conflict and climate change, a growing concern in global geopolitics. As nations become more aware of their carbon footprints, military emissions may become a focal point in international relations discussions, particularly among allies and global organizations addressing climate change.

AI Utilization

While it is difficult to ascertain if AI specifically influenced the writing of this article, the structured presentation of data and research findings could suggest the use of AI tools in analyzing trends or synthesizing information. If AI was employed, it could have shaped the narrative by emphasizing certain aspects of the research that align with broader environmental themes.

In conclusion, the article presents a compelling case regarding the environmental costs of military actions, particularly in the context of the Israel-Gaza conflict. However, the framing and potential biases warrant critical examination for a comprehensive understanding of the issues at play.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The carbon footprint of the first 15 months of Israel’s war on Gaza will be greater than the annual planet-warming emissions of a hundred individual countries, exacerbating the global climate emergency on top of the huge civilian death toll, new research reveals.

A study shared exclusivelywith the Guardian found the long-term climate cost of destroying, clearing and rebuilding Gaza could top 31m tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2e). This is more thanthe combined 2023 annualgreenhouse gases emitted by Costa Rica and Estonia, yet there is no obligation for states to report military emissions to the UN climate body.

Israel’s relentless bombardment, blockade and refusal to comply with international court rulings has underscored the asymmetry of each side’s war machine, as well as almost unconditional military, energy and diplomatic support Israel enjoys from allies including the US and UK.

Hamas bunker fuel and rockets account for about 3,000 tonnes of CO2e, the equivalent of just 0.2% of the total direct conflict emissions, while 50% were generated by the supply and use of weapons, tanks and other ordnance by the Israeli military (IDF), the study found.

Burning fossil fuels is causing climate chaos, with increasingly deadly and destructive extreme weather events forcing record numbers of people to migrate. The Gulf region is among the most vulnerable to extreme weather and slow-onset climate disasters including drought, desertification, extreme heat and erratic rainfall, as well as environmental degradation, food insecurity and water shortages.

The research, published by the Social Science Research Network, is part of a growing movement to hold states and businesses accountable for the climate and environmental costs of war and occupation, including the long-term impact damage to land, food and water sources, as well as post-conflict clean-up and reconstruction.

It is the third and most comprehensive analysis by a team of UK and US-based researchers into the climate cost of the first 15 months of conflict in which more than 53,000 Palestinians have been killed, in addition to widespread infrastructure damage and environmental catastrophe. It also provides the first, albeit partial, snapshot of the carbon cost of Israel’s other recent regional conflicts.

Overall, researchers estimate that the long-term climate cost of Israel’s military destruction inGaza– and recent military exchanges with Yemen, Iran and Lebanon – is equivalent to charging 2.6bn smartphones or running 84 gas power plants for a year. This figure includes the estimated 557,359 tCO2e arising from the occupation-era construction of Hamas’s network of tunnels and Israel’s “iron wall” barrier.

The killing and environmental destruction of Gaza resumed when Israel unilaterally violated the ceasefire after just two months, but the findings could eventually help calculate claims for reparations.

“This updated research evidences the urgency to stop the escalating atrocities, and make sure that Israel and all states comply with international law, including the decisions from the ICC and the ICJ,” said Astrid Puentes, UN special rapporteur on the human right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment. “Whether or not States agree on calling it a genocide, what we are facing is severely impacting all life in Gaza, and also threatening human rights in the region, and even globally, due to the aggravation of climate change.”

The study, currently under peer review by the journal One Earth, found:

Over 99% of the almost 1.89m tCO2e estimated to have been generated between the 7 October 2023 Hamas attack and the temporary ceasefire in January 2025 is attributed to Israel’s aerial bombardment and ground invasion of Gaza.

Almost 30% of greenhouse gases generated in that period came from the US sending 50,000 tonnes of weapons and other military supplies to Israel, mostly on cargo planes and ships from stockpiles in Europe. Another 20% is attributed to Israeli aircraft reconnaissance and bombing missions, tanks and fuel from other military vehicles, as well as CO2 generated by manufacturing and exploding the bombs and artillery.

Solar had generated as much as a quarter of Gaza’s electricity, representing one of the world’s highest shares, but most panels, and the territory’s only power plant, have been damaged or destroyed. Gaza’s limited access to electricity now mostly relies on diesel-guzzling generators that emitted just over 130,000 tons of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, or 7% of the total conflict emissions.

More than 40% of the total emissions were generated by the estimated 70,000 aid trucks Israel allowed into the Gaza Strip – which the UN has condemned as grossly insufficient to meet the basic humanitarian needs of 2.2m displaced and starving Palestinians.

But the most significant climate cost will come from rebuilding Gaza, which Israel has reduced to an estimated 60m tonnes of toxic rubble.

The carbon cost of trucking out debris and then rebuilding 436,000 apartments, 700 schools, mosques, clinics, government offices and other buildings, as well as 5km of Gaza’s roads, will generate an estimated 29.4m tonnes eCO2. This is on a par with the entire 2023 emissions generated by Afghanistan.

The reconstruction figure islower than previous estimates by the same research groupdue to a revision in the average size of apartment blocks.

“This report is a staggering and sobering reminder of the ecological and environmental cost of Israel’s genocidal campaign on the planet and its besieged people,” saidZena Agha, policy analystfor Palestinian policy network Al-Shabaka.

“But this is also the US, UK and EU’s war, all of which have provided seemingly limitless military resources to enable Israel to devastate the most densely populated place on the planet. This brings home the destabilising [regional] impact of the Israeli settler state and its inseparability from the western military-industrial complex.”

The war on Gaza has also provoked bloody regional tensions. The study found:

The Houthis in Yemen launched an estimated 400 rockets into Israel between October 2023 and January 2025, generating about 55 tCO2e. Israel’s aerial response generated almost 50 times more planet warming greenhouse gases. Aprevious studyfound that shipping emissions rose by an estimated 63% after the Houthis blocked the Red Sea corridor, forcing cargo ships to take longer routes.

A conservative estimate of emissions from two large-scale exchanges of missiles between Israel and Iran topped 5,000 tCO2e, with more than 80% down to Israel.

In Lebanon, more than 90% of the estimated 3,747 tCO2e generated by sporadic exchanges came from IDF bombs, with only 8% linked to Hezbollah rockets. The carbon cost of reconstructing 3,600 homes destroyed in southern Lebanon is almost as high as the annual emissions from the island of St Lucia.

The study is based on evolving methodology known as a scope 3+ framework which seeks to capture direct and indirect wartime emissions currently missing from global climate and conflict audits. This can include soil degradation, fires, infrastructure damage, displacement of people, aid, rerouting cargo ships and civil aviation.

Researchers relied on open-source information, media reports, and data from independent aid groups such as UN agencies. The true environmental costs are almost certainly higher given Israel’s media blockade, with data on razed farmland, desertification, remediation, and fires among other carbon-intense impacts hard to obtain.

“This conflict in Gaza shows that the numbers are substantial, greater than the entire greenhouse gas emissions of many entire countries, and must be included for accurate climate change and mitigation targets,” said Frederick Otu-Larbi, co-author, senior teaching associate at Lancaster Environment Centre and lecturer at University of Energy and Natural Resources in Ghana.

“Militaries need to reckon with the fact that their own national security and operational capacity is being compromised due to a changing climate of their own making,” said Ben Neimark, senior lecturer at Queen Mary University of London and study co-author.

Previous research has found that military emissions rise with spending and buildup.

Israel’s military budget surged in 2024 to $46.5bn – the largest increase in the world,according to theStockholm International Peace Research Institute. Based on one methodology, Israel’s baseline military emissions last year – excluding direct conflict and reconstruction climate costs – rose to 6.5m tCO2e. This is more than the entire carbon footprint of Eritrea, a country of 3.5 million people.

Yet under current UN rules, reporting military emission data is voluntary and limited to fuel use, despite the fact the climate cost of the destruction of Gaza will be felt globally. The IDF, like most militaries worldwide, has never reported emission figures to the UN.

Hadeel Ikhmais, head of the climate change office at the Palestinian Environmental Quality Authority, said: “Wars not only kill people but also release toxic chemicals, destroy infrastructure, pollute soil, air and water resources and accelerate climate and environmental disasters. War also destroys climate adaptation and hinders environmental management. Not counting carbon emissions is a black hole in accountability that allows governments to get away from their environmental crimes.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian