Call Me Izzy review – Jean Smart is better than her one-woman show

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Jean Smart Shines in 'Call Me Izzy,' Despite Flaws in the Material"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The rise of solo performances on Broadway has become a notable trend, as established actors showcase their talents in one-person shows. This format demands immense skill and stamina, as seen with Sarah Snook's recent Tony-winning portrayal in 'The Picture of Dorian Gray' and Jodie Comer's acclaimed performance in 'Prima Facie.' The latest addition to this wave is 'Call Me Izzy,' a debut play by Jamie Wax, featuring Jean Smart in a compelling solo role. At 73, Smart, best known for her role in 'Hacks,' captivates audiences with her seasoned charisma and magnetic presence, despite the material not fully matching her caliber. The play introduces Isabelle Scutley, a woman grappling with a challenging life in a Louisiana trailer park, where her dreams and aspirations are stifled by her harsh circumstances. Smart's performance brings depth to Izzy's struggles, highlighting the resilience and strength of a character who has been beaten down by life yet continues to search for hope and identity.

The narrative unfolds in a stark setting, with Izzy's story echoing themes of survival and self-discovery. Once a gifted student, her life takes a downturn after a young marriage to an abusive husband, who embodies the oppressive environment she longs to escape. As the play progresses, Izzy finds solace in poetry and literature, igniting a passion for words that offers a glimpse of freedom. Smart's portrayal is both poignant and humorous, as she navigates the complexities of Izzy's character with a blend of vulnerability and wit. However, the script raises questions about the portrayal of hardship for entertainment, drawing parallels to the often criticized 'poverty porn' in Hollywood. While audiences may find themselves rooting for Smart's character, the discomfort of commodifying such profound suffering lingers, prompting a reflection on the fine line between storytelling and exploitation in theater. Ultimately, 'Call Me Izzy' showcases Smart's undeniable talent, yet it also invites viewers to consider the narrative's implications beyond the stage.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The review of "Call Me Izzy" highlights the performance of Jean Smart, a seasoned actress known for her role in "Hacks." The article captures the essence of a recent trend in Broadway, where established actors are taking on the challenge of one-person shows. It draws attention to the pressure and artistry involved in such performances while also critiquing the material Smart is given to work with.

Context of the Review

The article situates "Call Me Izzy" within the broader context of a resurgence of solo performances on Broadway. This boom indicates a shift where audiences are increasingly drawn to the individual talent of actors like Smart, who can command the stage alone. The review reflects a celebration of an actress in the latter stages of her career, showcasing her ability to captivate despite the limitations of the script.

Perception Creation

This piece aims to create a perception of Jean Smart as a dynamic and compelling performer who successfully navigates the challenges of a solo show. The comparison to her previous roles not only highlights her talent but also positions her within a narrative of late-career success, appealing to audiences who appreciate seasoned performers. By emphasizing her charm and ability to engage with the audience, the article fosters a positive view of Smart and her role in the production.

Potential Omissions

While the review appreciates Smart's performance, it does not delve into potential criticisms of the writing itself or the broader implications of such one-woman shows in the theater landscape. This omission could suggest an attempt to maintain a focus on the actress rather than the play's shortcomings, perhaps to protect the reputation of the production and its creators.

Manipulative Elements

The article leans towards a positive portrayal of Smart while subtly downplaying the weaknesses of the play. It achieves this by using language that emphasizes her talents, such as "seasoned verve" and "magnetic presence." This selective focus could lead to a skewed perception of the overall production, suggesting a level of manipulation in how the narrative is constructed.

Reliability of the Review

The review seems credible, particularly due to its insights into the growing trend of solo performances. However, the emphasis on Smart's strengths over the play's weaknesses may indicate a biased perspective, potentially diminishing the review's objectivity. Readers should consider this angle when evaluating the overall quality of "Call Me Izzy."

Audience Engagement

The article is likely to resonate with theatergoers who admire strong performances and are supportive of veteran actors. It appeals to audiences who appreciate the nuances of theater and the challenges faced by actors in solo roles, creating a sense of community around these performances.

Market Impact

While the review itself may not directly influence stock prices or market dynamics, it highlights the increasing interest in Broadway productions, which can impact related industries, such as tourism and entertainment. Investors and stakeholders in theater productions might find such articles relevant for understanding audience trends.

Geopolitical Relevance

There is no direct geopolitical relevance in the review; however, it reflects cultural trends in entertainment, which can provide insight into societal values and interests. The focus on individual talent may mirror broader themes of resilience and personal storytelling prevalent in contemporary discourse.

AI Influence

It is unlikely that AI played a significant role in writing this review. The nuanced understanding of performance and the subjective nature of theater critique suggest human insights rather than algorithmic analysis. If AI were involved, it might have influenced the tone or style, but the depth of commentary indicates a human touch.

Conclusion

This review serves as a promotional piece for both Jean Smart and the production, celebrating her performance while navigating potential critiques of the material. The focus on individual talent and the dynamics of solo performances reflects broader cultural trends in the arts, though it may gloss over important aspects of the production itself.

Unanalyzed Article Content

We seem to be in the midst of a solo show boomlet on Broadway, with established screen actors testing their mettle via the downright athletic feat of carrying a production alone. On Sunday, the Succession actor Sarah Snookwon the Tonyfor best actress in a play for her 26 roles inThe Picture of Dorian Gray; two years earlier, Jodie Comer won for her equally kinetic solo performance inPrima Facieand just this week, John Krasinski’s (mostly) solo showAngry Alanopened off-Broadway. The appeal is clear: the one-man show is a flex, a feat of performance under a significant amount of pressure. It takes a village, always, but it all comes down to the person on stage.

Luckily for Call Me Izzy, writer and journalist Jamie Wax’s debut play onBroadway, that person is Jean Smart. The 73-year-old actor, most famous, at least at the moment, for her starring turn on the Max comedy Hacks, possesses the kind of seasoned verve and magnetic presence that is never less than fun to watch, even if the material can’t match her. Like her Emmy-winning Hacks character Deborah Vance, Smart is making the most of a late-career renaissance, surfing a wave of goodwill to the bright lights at Studio 54 for her first Broadway role in a quarter century, where she plays a woman with starkly different means – though no less resilience.

Those means are strikingly – one might say a little too strikingly – sparse. We first meet Isabelle Scutley, neé Fontenot, in the fall of 1989, cleaning the toilet in her trailer’s bathroom – her home’s one source of privacy and the stage’s one consistent set (stocked with period-specific cleaning supplies by scenic designer Mikiko Suzuki MacAdams). Her vocabulary and bank of literary references, recited from memory in reveries shaded, in this staging by Sarna Lapine, by elegiac blue light (lighting design Donald Holder) are expansive; her words, in Smart’s convivial, conspiratorial delivery, are truncated, as is her life in the small town of Mansfield, Louisiana, where she was born and where she has always remained.

Once a promising student with a preternatural gift for language, Izzy was whisked to the trailer park by a marriage at 17 – such was “the natural order of things”, she tells us – and has been beaten down ever since. Her husband Ferd, which in Izzy’s thick Louisiana drawl mutates to Irv, Erd or Thurd with each mention, is an alcoholic pipe fitter with a vicious mean streak. (Smart, who grew up in Seattle, worked with a dialect coach; as a midwesterner, I am simply unfit to judge the accuracy of the results.) He hates when she reads, spits on her dreams, rages when she has a personality and refuses to call her by her desired name, Izzy. Smart plays him, via Izzy’s inner monologue, with a skin-crawling sneer.

For an unspecified number of years, Izzy has turned inward, writing poems on toilet paper in the bathroom with her eyebrow pencil and hiding them in her Tampax box – the one place Ferd would never look – the Tampax box then concealed by a piece of fabric, as they are too poor even for cabinets. (In the way of Hollywood these days, Smart’s character is a vague age somewhere between 40 and her own.) Stalled out in survival mode, an escape hatch emerges via a new friend named Rosalie and a library card, her “secret ticket to anywhere”. Reading gives way to a romance with Shakespeare’s sonnets (and more recitation), to validation, recognition, acclaim and a collision course with Ferd’s willingness to physically beat any self-worth out of her.

There’s an inherent charge to seeing Izzy, as imbued with Smart’s natural charisma, break free; the script is peppered with wizened, self-deprecating cracks that Smart relishes: “I can fake an orgasm but I can’t fake a hug worth shit,” she quips. But there’s also an inescapable discomfort to milking such abject need, to hearing such graphic descriptions of physical abuse, for the sympathy of Broadway audiences at hundreds of dollars a pop. Smart is, obviously, a gifted comic actor and extremely compelling storyteller, but her gravity cannot overcome the nagging sense that this story – an indisputably genius writer overcomes indisputably dire circumstances via grit and the power of education – is the theatrical equivalent of the poverty porn that has baited Oscar voters for years.

Smart, as ever, imbues her characters with rough edges and idiosyncrasies, world-weariness coupled with an endearing naivety; her plaintive, rueful delivery of a brief description of reconciliation after a beating, how his regret provoked a feeling of closeness akin to a drug, hints at a more complicated version of the woman than on the page. It’s easy to cheer for Smart, and as evidenced by rounds of pitying applause at Studio 54, a little too easy for this show.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian