California’s Gavin Newsom demands Trump withdraw national guard troops from LA

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Gavin Newsom Requests Withdrawal of National Guard Troops from Los Angeles"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 5.7
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

California Governor Gavin Newsom has formally requested the Trump administration to withdraw the recently deployed National Guard troops from Los Angeles, deeming the action unlawful and an infringement on state sovereignty. In a letter addressed to Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Newsom argued that there is no pressing need for the National Guard's presence in the city, emphasizing that their deployment appears to be a deliberate attempt to escalate tensions rather than address any real security concerns. Newsom criticized the federal government's decision to federalize the National Guard under Title 10 authority, marking it as an unprecedented move since the 1992 LA riots. He highlighted that prior to the federal intervention, protests against US immigration policies had been largely manageable, and he expressed concerns about the implications of such federal actions on state governance and public safety.

The deployment of the National Guard followed two days of protests that saw some confrontations between demonstrators and law enforcement, resulting in injuries and arrests. While the White House characterized the unrest as widespread chaos, local leaders, including Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, have expressed their opposition to the deployment, stating that it exacerbates fear and instability within the community. Bass indicated that she had advised against bringing in the National Guard, underscoring that such actions could further divide and unsettle the city. In response to the situation, the Trump administration has suggested the possibility of escalating federal involvement, including the potential deployment of U.S. Marines to Los Angeles. This looming threat of additional military presence has raised alarms among local officials and Democratic governors, who have condemned the federal government's actions as an alarming abuse of power that undermines the authority of state governors over their National Guard units.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The situation described highlights a significant clash between state and federal authority, particularly amidst the backdrop of civil unrest in Los Angeles. Governor Gavin Newsom's formal request for the withdrawal of National Guard troops deployed by the Trump administration encapsulates the tension between local governance and federal intervention.

Political Implications

Newsom's actions can be seen as an appeal to state sovereignty and a critique of federal overreach. By labeling the deployment as "unlawful," he positions himself and California as defenders of state rights, which may resonate with constituents who prioritize local governance. This also serves to strengthen his political stance against the Trump administration, potentially consolidating support among Californians who oppose federal actions.

Perception Management

The language used in Newsom's communication is designed to evoke a sense of urgency and injustice. Phrases like "serious breach of state sovereignty" and "inflaming tensions" are emotionally charged and seek to cultivate a negative perception of federal intervention. This framing could lead to increased public dissent against the Trump administration, aligning with the broader narrative of federal authority being viewed with skepticism by certain demographics.

Potential Omissions

While the article focuses on the legality and implications of federal troop deployment, it may downplay the reasons behind such a decision—specifically, the protests and unrest concerning immigration policies. This could lead to a lack of understanding among the public regarding the complexities of the situation and the potential motivations behind the protests.

Manipulative Elements

The article's tone and framing can be considered manipulative. By emphasizing the potential dangers of federal deployment while minimizing the context of the unrest, it guides public perception toward viewing the National Guard's presence as unnecessary and provocative. The selective portrayal of events invites skepticism about the federal government while promoting Newsom's narrative.

Trustworthiness of the Report

The reliability of this news piece hinges on its sourcing and the balance of perspectives presented. While it provides clear statements from Newsom, it lacks comprehensive coverage of the federal side, which might lead some readers to question its impartiality.

Overall, the article reflects the contentious political climate and the struggle for authority between state and federal levels. The portrayal of events and the language employed suggest an intent to galvanize public opinion against federal intervention while rallying support for state leadership.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The California governor, Gavin Newsom, on Sunday evening formally requested that the Trump administration rescind the deployment of national guards troops inLos Angeles.

In a letter to the US secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, Newsom called the deployment unlawful, and asked for the troops to be put back under the state’s command.

“There is currently no need for the national guard to be deployed in Los Angeles, and to do so in this unlawful manner and for such a lengthy period is a serious breach of state sovereignty that seems intentionally designed to inflame the situation,” Newsom wrote.

“We didn’t have a problem until Trump got involved,” the governor tweeted. “This is a serious breach of state sovereignty – inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they’re actually needed. Rescind the order. Return control toCalifornia.”

The national guard began deploying to Los Angeles on Sunday morning, after Trump the previous day invoked title 10 authority, a federal law that allows the president to federalize national guard troops. Trump’s federalization of the guard troopsis the first timean American president has used such power since the 1992 LA riots.

Trump’s order came after two days of protests againstUS immigrationauthorities, which had led to confrontations between demonstrators and law enforcement. While the clashes were tense, with injuries among both police and demonstrators, they were concentrated in specific neighborhoods, with much of the rest of the city remaining unaffected.

Authorities said about 30 people were arrested on Saturday, including three on suspicion of assaulting an officer. The Los Angeles county sheriff’s office said three deputies sustained minor injuries.

On Sunday, about a dozen national guard members, along with Department of Homeland Security personnel, pushed back a group of demonstrators that had amassed outside a federal building in downtown Los Angeles.

The White House has portrayed the unrest as widespread, saying in a statement that “everyone saw the chaos, violence and lawlessness”. Administration officials have accused California leaders on failing to crack down sufficiently.

Trump, in a social media post on Sunday, called the demonstrators “violent, insurrectionist mobs” and said he was directing his cabinet officers “to take all such action necessary” to stop what he called “riots”.

Democratic governorsin a joint statementcondemned Trump’s deployment of the California national guard as an “alarming abuse of power”.

Sign up toHeadlines US

Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning

after newsletter promotion

“Governors are the commanders in chief of their national guard and the federal government activating them in their own borders without consulting or working with a state’s governor is ineffective and dangerous,” they wrote.

TheLos Angelesmayor Karen Bass said the deployment of the national guard was “the last thing Los Angeles needs”, and said she has received little information about how long troops will remain the city.

Bass said on Sunday she had discouraged the administration from bringing in the national guard. “We do not need to see our city torn apart,” she said, adding that people were “terrified”.

Trump’s move has been followed by the threat of even more escalation. On Saturday, Hegseth raised the possibility of deploying US marines to Los Angeles.

The US Northern Command said in a statement on Sunday that 500 marines from Twentynine Palms,California, about two hours east of Los Angeles, are in “prepared to deploy status should they be necessary to augment and support the DoD’s protection of federal property and personnel efforts”.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian