BuzzBallz, brat tenacity and hangover face: 25 things I learned about the world at Glastonbury 2025

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Cultural Reflections on Fashion and Identity at Glastonbury 2025"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.5
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The article reflects on the evolving cultural dynamics at the Glastonbury Festival, particularly the shifting attitudes towards personal grooming and fashion among attendees. It begins by revisiting a heated debate from the 1990s about whether feminists should shave their armpits, illustrating the tension between self-acceptance and societal expectations. The narrative transitions to contemporary fashion statements, as drag icon Bimini critiques festival attire, emphasizing the need for creativity and individuality rather than conformity. The text captures the playful spirit of Glastonbury, where the eclectic mix of styles ranges from edgy to whimsical, embodying a broader sense of rebellion and self-expression that has become more pronounced in recent years, particularly among younger women. Charli XCX’s influence is noted as a catalyst for this trend, suggesting a collective liberation from traditional norms and consumerism, although it hints at a possible decline in this movement as the festival evolves.

Additionally, the article delves into the unique social interactions and experiences at the festival, highlighting the sometimes overwhelming excitement of encountering celebrities and the culture of rumor and gossip that permeates the event. Observations about the festival's atmosphere, such as the communal vibe and the often humorous and absurd moments, reveal a deeper commentary on the nature of fame and public perception. The author notes the economic realities of attending Glastonbury, addressing the rising costs that may alienate younger audiences and questioning whether the festival's spirit can remain intact amidst such changes. Ultimately, the piece encapsulates the essence of Glastonbury as a living entity, rich in history and a reflection of contemporary society, as it navigates the complexities of identity, culture, and accessibility in a modern context.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

It was such a hot debate in the 90s, whether a feminist should shave her armpits. On the one hand, didn’t it speak of a profound unease in your own skin, the result of internalised patriarchal oppression, that you’d want to parade a hairlessness that everyone knew was fake, in order to satisfy a male gaze that fundamentally didn’t want to deal with the messy reality of you? And yet, on the other hand, wasn’t it so much neater and more feminine? Decisions, decisions. We argued a lot but shaved our pits anyway. Then the world moved on without us, and nobody does this any more. The worst thing is, if you’ve shaved your pits for long enough, they won’t grow back; like a metaphor for lost youth, made of hair.

Drag icon and activist Biminiwas wearing a red, white and blue bustier, fishnets, hot pants and 12in heels when they made their final adjudication on festival style: “Skimpy. Look, see what I mean?” They then pointed at someone in the crowd who was wearing a bra and shorts, and looked quite surprised to be singled out. “Skimpy, skimpy, skimpy.”

Generally speaking – and no offence, surprised crowd-member – it’s not enough to get dressed, take off one layer and then go out; you have to mix it up a bit. Regular trousers with the arse removed; panels cut out to reveal random segments of hamstring; vest tops rolled up on one side. The vibe is Flintstone or fetish, your call.

This time last year, the spirit ofCharli xcxseemed to herald a new spirit of rebellion and devil-may-care among young women specifically, all women generally, and actually, hell, all people. An awesome amount of time was spent explaining to each other what a “brat” was – she had ladders in her tights and didn’t wash her hair, except on a Wednesday; if she got drunk in the morning, it was because that’s what she’d decided; she was never waiting for anyone’s call. It was anti-consumerist, anti-wellness, anti-pilates, an emancipation from bullshit. If it had all been a flash in the pan, that would have been quite sad.

Charli ceremonially burned the green brat curtain at the end of her set, and the homemade brat merch in the crowd has thinned out. But Charli xcx ain’t going nowhere – she’s like herself times a thousand.

If I saw someone famous, I would leave them in peace, up to the point of pretending not to notice who they were. I’d never ask for a selfie, I’d never tell them how much they’d meant to me and insert some heartfelt detail, I’d try not to even poke the person I was with and say, “Look,it’s so-and-so,” because, in the end, the celeb is a person, not a zoo animal. They always have to find some way to match your surprise and enthusiasm, which just isn’t possible. Plus they’ll have recently come off stage, and likely be way too hot.

So I thought, anyway. Then I saw Mr Tumble, fresh out of the CBeebies House Party, and I had to tell him he’d saved the 2010s for me, and I had to get a selfie, even though I was so overexcited that it only has my ear in it.

Stick in a band called “Patchwork” and everyone knows it’s Pulp. News of an unscheduled Lewis Capaldi show will go round faster than measles in a post-facts autocracy. Sometimes the details get a bit lost, so a “secret” Fat Dog set will become the rumour of a “secret” appearance by Wet Leg – don’t go to the rumour mill for accuracy. But the minute the mill grinds into gear, it will not rest until everyone, everywhere, knows everything. The information age has created a desperate appetite for intel that was not freely given up. No one ever asks whether it’s any more special than all the other intel.

As Jarvis Cocker said, 30 years and four days after he first played this festival, Glastonbury is bigger than any of us. It is an entity, and it is alive. And, like any living thing, sometimes it spawns a stupid idea, which you just have to hope doesn’t spread. This year, imagine a bucket hat, made of fake fur, probably pink.

Don’t rub it in on a stranger and look like a creep; don’t try to discuss their sunscreen needs and look as though you’re trying to make friends in the most boring possible way. If you see the back of a neck going a bit red, just spray them and be on your way.

As the queue for coffee snaked endlessly across the grass, the barista explained that nobody’s face ID was working because they were all too hungover.

No amount of “whither political civility?” will do it, no casual or strident dismissals of their viewpoint. I decline to extrapolate from this anything about public opinion on issues besides Kneecap. Let’s just leave it at:people really like Kneecap.

You’ve got to wonder what you’re trying to say with this Betty Draper cosplay, which even Gracie Abrams was spotted in. Do you have to cover your head because your hair is too beautiful to look at directly, and your modesty too pronounced? Are you about to engage in some agricultural labour?

Solid pickled onion on the front taste, and any idiot could get that; followed by a chilli kick, which in the Pringle universe goes by the generic “spicy”. Whether or not this is what Mario and Luigi would have wanted is anyone’s guess.

If you saw it on a flyer, you’d think: nah. Oversized sheep’s head atop a real person’s head, so they look like a sheep, but not very much like one? Nah, I’m good. Little Sooty-and-Sweep-style hand puppets, peeking over the top of the DJ booth? I can live without those.

But you onlythinkyou can live without that, friend. Nobody knows why, but when they appear, puppets add an incomprehensible amount of gaiety.

That’s part of the point! You’re not supposed to be wearing it just for the colourway.

Third or maybe 30th-hand, I heard the story of a guy whose girlfriend was Egyptian, and she’d never heard of Stonehenge. He showed her a picture of it, thinking she must have seen it and not remembered its name, and her response? “Your ancestors were small and weak.” Hun, you think Stonehenge is not all that, you should see the stone circle at Glastonbury. And yet the hippies are all over it.

People might just be wearing the boots because they’re flattering, the hats because it’s hot, and the tasselled jackets to complete the look, and it might just be coincidence that everyone is doing that at the same time. However, let’s say that it isn’t, and there’s a deeper message: it’s that everyone wishes Beyoncé was here.

Everyone thinks Starmix is the main Haribo; for years, we’ve all been sitting here thinking: “It’s weird, I don’t like them, they have a spongy texture, underwhelming flavour spectrum and insufficient interest, but other people must like them, because they’re the main Haribo.” This is completely wrong. If you leave a range of the popular sweets in a populated office space, as I did at Glastonbury, this is the order in which they disappear; Nostalgix; Tangfastics; Giant Strawbs; Strips; Supermix; Happy Cola. Starmix comes a solid last.

Neon-coloured plastic balls of boozethat taste like a cocktail of battery acid and squash – I’ve asked family members before who drinks these things, and the answer is always: people whose fake ID is so amateurish it only works in a corner shop. But this is not so! They are amazingly well-designed for drinking on the move, especially if you want to play catch beforehand.

The gnarly pop rocker stunned everyone in 2023 when he announced that not only had he fallen out of love with the Tories, he’d go one further and give Labour a go. All eyes were on Stewart this year, to see if anything in his swagger would indicate whether he was still team Starmer or had reverted to his true blue roots. Two days before his legend slot, he blew the suspense by coming out in favour of Nigel Farage. Which is … a worry, I guess?

OK, fine, I’m old, but I remember when you’d never say “cunt”, even if you regularly thought it, without first checking that your interlocutor would be OK with it. I was there when it was thought of as possibly misogynistic. I can definitely recall a time when you might think the word, you’d be medium sure your companion also thought it, but you wouldn’t say it out loud in case you sounded a bit unboundaried. Those days are apparently well and truly over. Between the T-shirts, the fans and the flags, this no longer seems to be one of the strongest words in the language.

Mel C was the only IRL sighting of a Spice Girl at Glastonbury, but they were all there in spirit, owing to the surprising amount of – what would you call it? – heraldry all over the place.

… and equality is great, but: when you see how much engineering and overdesign has to go into pretending standing up to wee is a good idea, it feels like a metaphor about adapting to the patriarchy.

You think you’re being concerned and nice, and you probably don’t mean anything by it. In your head, it might have a jaunty upwards inflection: “You OK, all well in your world?” To the hearer, however, it can sound likeanything: are you angry, are you on the brink of a nervous breakdown, are you the most hungover you’ve been in your life, are you on the level, are you reliable? Find something else to say. A simple “how are you?” works well.

There is a lot of step chat at Glastonbury, but come on. You’re in a big place, where things are far away from each other, and there aren’t any buses. Obviously you walked a lot.

People go on so much about portable hygiene, and nobody ever mentions that you’ll use precisely three wet wipes, and then you’ll forget about them for a year, and – pro tip – whatever happens, you will never come back from any camping experience going”: “Thank God for those wet wipes.” A parasol, on the other hand, is the difference between you and that idiot who’s in A&E right now.

After some epic inflation, a ticket is now £373.50 plus a £5 booking fee, up from £225 a decade ago. Travel is going to be a hundred quid unless you live in one of the surrounding villages; food bargains do exist but only if you think £6 for a bag of nachos is a bargain; and there is no way on earth you’re getting into the festival spirit, which is to say drunk, with change from £50. It’s an £800 long weekend, which is hardly a newsflash, but it does mean that acts likeFaye Webster, with more of a teenage following, are underpopulated. Is it unreasonable to mourn a time when more young people could afford to come? Am I being nostalgix?

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian