Brooding, fearsome views of a blackened earth: Jungjin Lee’s epic Iceland photographs – review

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Jungjin Lee's 'Unseen' Exhibition Showcases Black-and-White Icelandic Landscapes"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.5
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Jungjin Lee’s exhibition titled 'Unseen' presents a striking collection of large black-and-white photographs taken in Iceland, showcasing her unique artistic vision. This exhibition marks her first solo show in the UK despite her extensive career spanning three decades. Lee's works invite viewers to engage with their own emotional landscapes, as the photographs do not provide explicit narratives about the times or places depicted. Rather, they serve as a visual exploration of the viewer's inner psyche, compelling them to confront the 'unseen' aspects of their own experiences. Lee's artistic journey began in South Korea, where she first trained in traditional calligraphy, later studying ceramics. This diverse background informs her photographic style, which blends the technical precision of her formative years with a deeply personal approach to landscape photography.

The landscapes captured in Iceland serve as a canvas for existential reflections, embodying themes of nature's supremacy and human emotion. Lee’s images portray dramatic vistas that evoke a sense of awe and introspection. For instance, one photograph presents a road leading into a dark abyss, while another captures the tension between land and sea. The textures and contrasts in her work are enhanced by her innovative techniques, which include using a medium format panoramic camera and hand-emulsified processes that draw from her background in calligraphy and ceramics. These methods not only create visually striking images but also infuse them with a tactile quality reminiscent of traditional Korean ink paintings. Lee’s artistic mastery shines through, as each photograph resonates with both personal and universal themes, inviting viewers to reflect on their own emotional landscapes within the broader context of nature's raw power. This exhibition at Huxley-Parlour Gallery in London, running until July 5, is a testament to Lee’s ability to transform landscapes into profound explorations of the human condition.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The review of Jungjin Lee's exhibition highlights the deeply personal and introspective nature of her photography. By focusing on the emotional responses elicited by her black-and-white landscapes of Iceland, the article invites readers to consider their own inner landscapes and unresolved experiences. This approach not only elevates Lee's work beyond mere visual representation but also positions her as an artist who encourages viewers to engage with their own past traumas.

Purpose of the Article

The review aims to introduce Jungjin Lee's work to a UK audience, emphasizing her unique artistic journey and the emotional depth of her photographs. It seeks to position Lee as an artist worthy of attention, especially considering this is her first solo show in the UK after a long career. By framing her work as a reflection of the viewer's psyche, the article encourages a more profound appreciation of art that resonates on a personal level.

Community Perception

The text cultivates an image of Lee's work as transformative and introspective. It suggests that her photography can serve as a mirror for viewers to confront their own hidden fears and traumas. This framing may attract an audience keen on exploring psychological and emotional themes through art, fostering a community that values introspection and personal growth.

Concealed Aspects

While the review does not explicitly indicate any hidden agendas, it does hint at a desire to elevate Lee's profile in the art world, potentially masking the broader context of her work within contemporary discussions of art and trauma. By focusing on the emotional impact of her photography, the article might simplify the complexities of her artistic influences and the socio-political context of her work.

Manipulative Elements

There is a subtle manipulation in the way the article presents Lee's work. By framing it as a catalyst for personal reflection, the review may lead readers to feel an obligation to engage with their own traumas, thus creating a sense of urgency and importance around the exhibition. This can enhance the perceived value of Lee's art but may also divert attention from other artistic or contextual critiques.

Truthfulness of the Article

The review appears to be grounded in genuine appreciation for Lee's work and her artistic journey. However, the subjective nature of art criticism means that interpretations can vary widely. Thus, while the review is likely sincere, the emotional framing may not resonate with all audiences, leading to a mixed perception of its truthfulness.

Societal Impact

This article could influence societal views on art as a means of personal healing and reflection. By promoting the idea that art can facilitate the confrontation of trauma, it may encourage more individuals to seek out art for its therapeutic qualities. This could lead to a broader acceptance of art in mental health discussions, impacting funding and support for arts initiatives.

Audience Targeting

The language and themes in the review suggest it is aimed at art enthusiasts, particularly those interested in the psychological dimensions of art. It may also appeal to individuals engaged in discussions about mental health, personal growth, and the therapeutic benefits of creative expression.

Market Implications

While the article itself may not have direct implications for stock markets or global financial trends, it could influence the art market by drawing attention to Lee's work and potentially increasing her visibility and sales. Art institutions and galleries may see a rise in interest in similar artists who explore themes of trauma and reflection, impacting their programming and funding.

Geopolitical Relevance

There is no clear geopolitical significance in the article, as it focuses on an individual artist's work rather than broader political issues. However, the themes of trauma and personal history could resonate in a global context, particularly in societies grappling with collective trauma.

AI Usage in Writing

It is unlikely that AI played a significant role in the writing of this article, as the nuanced critique and emotional engagement suggest a human touch. If AI models were involved, they might have helped in structuring the review or analyzing artistic themes but would not have captured the depth of personal interpretation effectively.

In conclusion, the review of Jungjin Lee's exhibition serves to elevate her profile and engage readers in a deeper contemplation of their own emotional landscapes. While it is largely sincere and reflective, the framing also introduces elements of manipulation that encourage personal introspection. Overall, the article is a valuable contribution to art criticism, though its emotional emphasis may not appeal to all audiences.

Unanalyzed Article Content

There’s a visual quiz circulating on social media at the moment that promises to reveal your unresolved childhood trauma. Do you see an elephant first or a forest? A butterfly or an apple? Jungjin Lee’s exhibition, called Unseen,is in some ways an elevated version of that. The series of large, black-and-white landscape photographs – all made last year in Iceland – do not tell you anything about the times, or the place. Instead what you see depends on what is buried in you – threatening to open up that scary, unbidden “unseen”.

Lee, who lives in New York, is little known in the UK beyond her photobooks. This small show of 10 works is her first solo show in the UK in a 30-year career. Her background is important in deciphering these images. Her first artistic training was in the traditional calligraphic arts, as a child growing up in South Korea. Later she studied ceramics at Hongik University in Seoul, where artists such as Lee Bul were among her peers.

In the late 1980s, her first photography project followed an old man living on a remote Korean island, documenting his search for wild ginseng. In a decade, he had never found a single plant. But by the time Lee had finished the project, she realised what she had made was more a reflection of her own state of mind, and that she would never be a documentary photographer. She turned her back on the genre for good.

After moving to New York, she worked for a time as an assistant to Robert Frank. His attitude, rather than his style, influenced Lee, who was moved by the way he followed his instincts and interests. In the 1990s, she began to travel the US and make portraits of a decaying American landscape and its elements: the barren desert, the unforgiving wind, the endless debris. These clamouring landscapes were, and continue to be, portraits of the artist as rocks, trees, and thrashing waves. They come to be portraits of the viewer, too.

This new body of work was all made last year, in Iceland. Many contemporaries of Lee have made work about or with the Icelandic elements: Roni Horn, Ragnar Axelsson, Olafur Eliasson. Lee also responds to this aspect of the place. The specific topographies there provided Lee with what she needed: dramatic vistas capable of carrying the epic literary qualities of her work, the full range of human emotion. They are brooding, fearsome and roar with the supremacy of nature. The landscape, to Lee, is an expression of existential angst and metaphorical musings. Out there is the only subject capable of holding everything that’s in here, in us.

We are placed on an empty road that plunges into a dark abyss on the horizon (#83), or at the frothy seam of the sea and land (#55). You can almost feel the salty air slap your face in a portrait of an imposing rock standing resolute against the choppy water that whips up around it (#76). Its coarse and craggy surface seems to contain the history of the world. A smoky cloud descends on a blackened earth, its symbolism striking.

What you see, of course, is subjective. A mournful picture of two rocks (#49) shows them rising like tombstones from the sea, one large, jutting out, one tiny and intrepid, as if heading off into the distance. I make out the tender figures of a mother and child, the child forging ahead, falteringly, off into the unknown. I see Frank’s influence surfacing: the “humanity of the moment.” And the moment is uncertain.

You have to be a decent artist – even more so, working with a camera – to make a landscape picture interesting. Part of the brilliance of Lee’s work comes from her technical mastery, which reflects her journey as an artist, from the calligraphy of her childhood and the same raw approach to moulding the earth with her hands, adapted from ceramics.

Sign up toArt Weekly

Your weekly art world round-up, sketching out all the biggest stories, scandals and exhibitions

after newsletter promotion

It starts with a medium format Panoramic camera. She then brushes the negative with processing emulsion soaked on to delicatehanji, or Korean mulberry paper, and bathes them at a slightly higher temperature than is conventional for fixing. This optimises the mottled, etched textures. These hand-emulsified images are then transformed again, into digital images, at which point she tinkers with the contrasts and prints them again.

The brushstrokes to the surface are palpable and are as evocative Korean ink paintings – you can’t help but trace the influence of a pictorialist tradition that seeps unmistakably into Lee’s work. The knockout textures and the charcoal tones are aesthetically closer to drawings. At times the photograph seems to dissolve completely: in #10, a minimalist picture of a sloping mountain is stretched to abstraction, its suggestive black lines merely mimicking what was there.

Jungjin Lee: Unseen is atHuxley-Parlour Gallery, London, until 5 July

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian