British artist claims he has created paint in ‘new’ colour announced by scientists

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Artist Stuart Semple Creates Paint Version of Newly Discovered Color 'Olo'"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

British artist Stuart Semple has announced that he has created a paint version of a new color called 'olo,' which was originally discovered by scientists at the University of California, Berkeley. The researchers achieved this groundbreaking color through an experiment that involved firing laser pulses into the eyes of five individuals, stimulating their retinal cells to perceive a color beyond the natural human spectrum. Semple's paint, which he has named 'yolo,' is available for £10,000 per 150ml jar, or £29.99 for artists. Unlike the high-tech method used in the Berkeley experiment, Semple utilized a more traditional approach by mixing pigments and incorporating fluorescent optical brighteners to enhance the visibility of the color. He used a spectrometer to analyze the light intensity of his paint to closely match the hue produced by the scientists.

Semple's artistic endeavors are not new; he has a history of creating vibrant paints, including the world's blackest and pinkest paints. His motivation stems from a desire to democratize color, making it accessible to everyone rather than allowing it to be monopolized by corporations or individuals. The color 'olo' is named after the binary code 010, which indicates that only the medium (M) cones in the eye are activated, creating a unique visual experience. Despite Semple's enthusiasm, vision scientist Austin Roorda from the Berkeley team expressed skepticism about the ability to recreate the true essence of 'olo' with paint, suggesting that any reproduction would inevitably fall short. Roorda even humorously noted his own attempts at mixing drinks to mimic the color, although he found the results less than appealing. Overall, Semple's venture into creating 'yolo' reflects both his artistic innovation and the ongoing fascination with the science of color perception.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article presents a fascinating intersection of art and science, focusing on British artist Stuart Semple's claims of creating a paint color inspired by a scientific discovery. This blend of creativity and scientific inquiry raises several questions about the motivations behind the news, the public perception it aims to shape, and its broader implications.

Motivation Behind the News

The article highlights a narrative that underscores the democratization of color and art. By emphasizing Semple's approach to making a scientifically inspired color accessible to everyone, it suggests a challenge to traditional notions of ownership in art. This reflects a broader cultural movement that seeks to question who gets to control artistic expressions and innovations.

Public Perception

The report aims to foster an appreciation for the interplay between art and science. By framing Semple as a rebellious artist taking on corporate monopolies and exclusive claims to color, the article likely seeks to resonate with audiences who value creativity and accessibility. It positions Semple as a champion for artists and a disruptor in the art world.

Hidden Agendas

While the article celebrates Semple's achievements, it may downplay the complexities of scientific discovery and intellectual property. By simplifying the narrative to focus on Semple's artistic endeavors, it could obscure discussions around the ethical implications of color ownership in both art and science.

Truthfulness of the Article

The claims made in the article seem credible, as they are grounded in actual scientific research conducted at a reputable institution. However, the sensationalization of the color's discovery and Semple's replication may warrant a more nuanced understanding of the scientific process involved.

Societal Implications

This news could inspire a shift in how we perceive the relationship between art and science, potentially influencing public interest in both fields. It may encourage greater collaboration between artists and scientists, leading to innovative projects that blur the lines between disciplines.

Target Audience

The article appeals primarily to art enthusiasts, scientists, and individuals interested in innovation. It likely resonates with communities that value creativity, exploration, and the challenge of established norms.

Market Impact

While the article may not directly affect stock markets, it could influence the art supply industry, particularly for companies that produce pigments and paints. Increased interest in unique colors may lead to heightened sales in specialized art supplies.

Global Context

On a broader scale, the article touches on themes relevant to contemporary discussions about intellectual property and creativity. In an age where innovation is often claimed by corporations, Semple's approach may reflect a growing societal desire for shared access to cultural and scientific advancements.

Artificial Intelligence Influence

There is no clear indication that AI played a role in the composition of this news article. However, it is possible that AI models could have been used in editing or optimizing the content for online platforms. The writing style appears human-driven, focusing on narrative engagement rather than algorithmic precision.

Manipulation Potential

This article does not exhibit overt manipulative tactics, but its framing of Semple as a hero could influence public sentiment. By presenting the narrative in a way that champions creativity against corporate interests, it may evoke an emotional response that aligns readers with Semple's cause.

In conclusion, while the article presents a compelling story about the intersection of art and science, it also invites scrutiny regarding its simplifications and the broader implications of color ownership. The narrative serves to promote a cultural shift towards inclusivity in the arts, emphasizing the need for access to innovation.

Unanalyzed Article Content

A British artist claims to have replicated in paint a colour thatscientists say they discovered by having laser pulses fired into their eyes.

Stuart Semplecreated his own version of the blue-green colour based on the US research published inScience Advances, which he is selling on his website for £10,000 per 150ml jar – or £29.99 if you state you are an artist.

In the experiment conducted at University of California, Berkeley, a laser was used to stimulate individual cells in the retinas of five researchers, pushing their perception of colour beyond its natural limits.

Semple, who has previously made what he claims to be the world’s blackest and pinkest paints, synthesised his version of the colour in a more low-tech manner.

The artist mixed pigments, adding fluorescent optical brightenersthat absorb ultraviolet light and re-emit it as visible blue light, making materials appear whiter or brighter. Using a spectrometer, which separates light into its constituent colours, he then analysed their intensity to best match his paint samples to the target hue.

“I’ve always thought that colour should be available to everybody,” said the artist, who also produced his own version ofYves Klein’s famous ultramarine blue paint. “I’ve fought for years to liberate these colours that are either corporately owned or scientists have staked a claim to, or have been licensed to an individual person.”

The scientists named the colour olo. Semple, who called his version yolo, has form for irreverently reproducing colours only available to an exclusive few.

When the artist Anish Kapoorbought the exclusive rights to the world’s blackest paint, Semplemade what he said was a blacker oneand banned the Turner prizewinner from using it.

Humans perceive the colours of the world when light falls on colour-sensitive cells called cones in the retina. There are three types of cones that are sensitive to long (L), medium (M) and short (S) wavelengths of light.

Red light primarily stimulates L cones, while blue light chiefly activates S cones. But M cones sit in the middle and there is no natural light that excites these alone.

The Berkley experiment produced a colour beyond the natural range of the naked eye because the M cones are stimulated almost exclusively. Its name olo comes from the binary 010, indicating that of the L, M and S cones, only the M cones are switched on.

Semple said: “I think they’ve triggered an experience in people that they’re approximating to a colour. What I’ve done is tried to make an actual colour of that experience.”

Austin Roorda, a vision scientist on the Berkley team, said he would buy a bottle of the paint, but not for £10,000. “I might even commission my cousin who’s an artist to do some work with this paint,” he said.

“It’s impossible to recreate a colour that matches olo,” he added. “Any colour that you can reproduce would just pale by comparison. It doesn’t matter whether it’s a paint or a swatch of colour or something or even a monochromatic laser, which generate the most saturated natural human colour experiences.”

The scientist said he had also tried to recreate the colour by meticulously mixing two liqueurs: the slightly sweet melon-flavoured Midori and Blue Curacau, made from the dried peel of the bitter orange.

“It’s a bit foul, Roorda said of the concoction’s taste. “But the more I drink, the more it looks like olo.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian