‘Breath-stoppingly tense’: which Mission: Impossible film is the greatest?

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"'Mission: Impossible' Film Series: A Comprehensive Analysis of Its Evolution and Impact"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.6
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The 'Mission: Impossible' film series, known for its high-stakes action and intricate plots, has evolved significantly since its inception. The first film, directed by Brian De Palma, set the tone with a blend of modern blockbuster elements and classic film noir sensibilities. Tom Cruise's portrayal of Ethan Hunt, an IMF agent wrongfully accused of murder, showcased a more complex character than his earlier roles. This film introduced audiences to a world of deception and high-wire stunts, establishing a foundation for the franchise. It was not just an action movie; it was a psychological thriller where tension built around the protagonist's attempts to navigate a treacherous environment filled with double-crosses and moral dilemmas. The film's stylish execution and gripping narrative made it a standout, even as it masked the behind-the-scenes drama involving competing scriptwriters.

As the franchise progressed, each installment brought its own unique flavor, with directors like John Woo and Christopher McQuarrie adding their distinct styles to the mix. 'Mission: Impossible II' is remembered for its iconic moments, despite being a chaotic experience for its cast and crew, while 'Mission: Impossible III' marked a pivotal point for Cruise’s career, revitalizing his public image during a tumultuous period. The fourth film, 'Ghost Protocol,' set a new benchmark for action sequences, particularly with Cruise's breathtaking Burj Khalifa climb. With 'Rogue Nation' and 'Fallout,' the series embraced a collaborative approach that deepened character development and elevated stunt work to new heights. Each film contributed to a rich tapestry of espionage and action, culminating in the thrilling, visually stunning sequences of the most recent entries, which continue to push the boundaries of cinematic action and storytelling. The franchise's success lies not only in its relentless pace but also in its ability to evolve while maintaining the core elements that fans have come to love.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article delves into the cinematic legacy of the "Mission: Impossible" franchise, particularly focusing on the tension and artistry behind its creation. It highlights the contrast between the films' polished exterior and the complex narrative struggles occurring behind the scenes. The analysis of the first two films showcases the evolution of the series, illustrating how each film contributes uniquely to its overall legacy.

Cinematic Tension and Artistic Merit

The writer emphasizes the intricate balance of genre influences in the original "Mission: Impossible," showcasing its Hitchcockian aspects. This suggests that the film is not merely an action movie but also a meticulously crafted thriller, thus elevating its status within cinema history. By depicting Tom Cruise's character, Ethan Hunt, as a multifaceted figure, the article highlights the character's evolution and the depth that the narrative achieves through tension and suspense. Such a portrayal can enhance the audience's appreciation for the film's craft.

Audience Perception

There seems to be an intention to engage audiences who appreciate both action and narrative complexity in films. The article likely aims to shape viewer perceptions of the "Mission: Impossible" series as not only entertaining but also intellectually stimulating. This could foster a deeper connection with long-time fans of the franchise and attract new viewers seeking more than just action-packed sequences.

Hidden Agendas or Oversights

While the article primarily focuses on film analysis, it might overlook broader industry trends or issues, such as the impact of blockbuster filmmaking on smaller independent films. However, this omission does not necessarily indicate a manipulative agenda but rather a focused commentary on a specific franchise.

Manipulative Nature of the Article

The article does not appear overtly manipulative; it provides an analysis grounded in film critique. However, there is a subtle persuasion in how it elevates the films, which may influence opinions about the franchise positively. This could be seen as an attempt to bolster the films' reputation among critics and viewers alike.

Reliability and Trustworthiness

The analysis seems well-grounded, pulling from established cinematic critiques and recognized filmmaking elements. The focus on the first two films allows for a detailed exploration of their qualities, suggesting a thoughtful approach rather than sensationalism. This bolsters the article's reliability, as it presents a reasoned argument rather than unsupported claims.

Community and Economic Impact

The discussion surrounding "Mission: Impossible" may resonate with specific communities, particularly film enthusiasts who appreciate action and narrative depth. The franchise's success can also influence economic aspects, particularly if it results in increased viewership or box office sales. A renewed interest in the series could benefit not only the studios involved but also ancillary markets, such as merchandise and streaming services.

Global Relevance

While the article's primary focus is cinematic, it does touch upon themes of tension and conflict that resonate in various socio-political contexts. The mechanics of espionage and deception explored in the films could have parallels in real-world scenarios, drawing interest from audiences aware of contemporary global issues.

Artificial Intelligence Considerations

There is no clear indication that AI has been employed in the writing of this article. The narrative style appears human-driven, reflecting critical analysis rather than formulaic reporting. However, if AI were used, it might have influenced the structure or tone to ensure engagement with the audience.

In conclusion, the article serves as a thoughtful examination of the "Mission: Impossible" films, highlighting their artistic merit and the intricate craft behind them. Its reliability stems from a well-reasoned critique, although it may subtly shape audience perceptions in favor of the franchise's legacy.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Mission: Impossible’s slick and sensuous surface bears no trace of the drama behind the scenes making it. During production, the screenwriters of Jurassic Park (David Koepp) and Chinatown (Robert Towne) sent in duelling script pages for director Brian De Palma and producer Tom Cruise to wrestle over. The magnificent outcome is an intense tango between the modern blockbuster and a classic film noir, circling each other warily, and beautifully, like noMission: Impossiblethat would follow. De Palma’s original is a sexy wrong-man thriller, a Hitchcockian affair that comes disguised as an action-heavy corporate product (or maybe the mask is worn the other way around?). In it, Cruise’s coiled IMF agent, framed for the murder of his entire team and surrounded by slippery allies, is constantly trying to play it cool through the plot’s knotty parlor games, all while feeling the noose tightening around him. If Cruise’s career up to this point was all about often leaving his relaxed boyish middle-American charm on the surface, Mission: Impossible pushed him to try on layers – not just the latex ones – while also pulling off those incredible high-wire stunts, which would only escalate but never improve on the hair-raising tension the first time out.Radheyan Simonpillai

By film two, Ethan Hunt is still sort of a blank-slate action man – but John Woo’s take on M:I stands out simply by having the highest iconic-moment-per-minute ratio in the entire series. Cruise first appears on the screen free-soloing a mountain and takes delivery of his mission in the form of a set of rocket-delivered exploding sunglasses: then it’s straight into the motorbike duels, rubber masks and capoeira kicks, with barely a pause for breath. There is a scene in this film whereTom Cruiseflawlessly impersonates a man who is three inches taller than him. There is a stunt where Dougray Scott was encouraged,by Cruise, to put his entire weight on a knife mere millimetres above the megastar’s eyeball, just for a cool closeup. The soundtrack is by Hans Zimmer andLimp Bizkit. It might be silly, and Thandiwe Newton described the shoot as “a nightmare”, but no other Impossible is as rewatchable, let alone as fun.Joel Snape

It’s almost impossible to overstate the importance of Mission: Impossible III. For the franchise it was key (the previous John Woo-directed installment remains a baffling mess), but for Cruise himself it was absolutely vital. The film was released right at his nadir. One year earlier, he had gone off the rails in public – leaping on Oprah’s couch, lambasting interviewers for being glib for asking questions about Scientology – and he was three months away from being temporarily sacked from Paramount by its boss, Sumner Redstone. But if Mission: Impossible III delivered, he’d still have a career left to salvage. Luckily it did. Later outings might have outdone it in terms of scale and spectacle, but M:I III was responsible for laying the table for those films. This was the first film where Ethan Hunt was an actual person, not just a smirking mannequin. It was also where we first met Benji, Simon Pegg’s superlative sidekick. The stunts had a pleasingly smashmouth quality (check out the way that Cruise is awkwardly flung against a car during an explosion). What’s more, in Philip Seymour Hoffman, we had the most intense villain of the franchise. Mission: Impossible III is a great film, but the most perfect thing about it is that it arrived just when Tom Cruise needed it most.Stuart Heritage

There isn’t really a bad Mission: Impossible sequel, a compliment one would be hard pressed paying to the majority of eight-film-strong franchises (the second, which many would pick, still possesses an aggressively, Limp Bizkit-y year 2000 charm for me). But the one that most effectively packages all of the expected elements is the fourth instalment, Ghost Protocol, which set the perfect blueprint for the latter chapters. Brad Bird might not have been the most stylish of Mission directors (De Palma he is not) but, with a background in animation, there’s both a buoyancy and a clarity to the unrelenting action, delivering some of the most thrillingly staged and paced action sequences in the series (has there been anything more exciting than Cruise climbing the Burj Khalifa?). There’s also something hilariously demented about Cruise responding to quibbles over his age or longevity in the role by offering us two potential replacements in Josh Holloway and Jeremy Renner and then killing one and emasculating the other. King behaviour, honestly.Benjamin Lee

Eleven years after the release of Rogue Nation, it might look less like a highlight than a series turning point, when it switched from accidental director anthology to a long-term collaboration between writer-director Christopher McQuarrie and Tom Cruise. Rogue Nation was the first of four McQuarrie-directed Missions, and the practical, Cruise-endangering stunt work that became a series trademark was, by its nature, repeatedly topped by subsequent instalments. The opening, which merely has Cruise actually hanging on to the side of a real plane as it takes off, camera fixed on him to assure us that it’s not an illusion, now seems downright quaint. But as a spy caper featuring stunts (the airplane opener), break-ins (a spectacularly tricky underwater data breach during which Cruise’s Ethan Hunt literally dies), noir-ish intrigue (the gorgeous sequence at the Vienna Opera House and the shadowy climax recall both Hitchcock and The Third Man), and sheer blockbuster much-ness (the underwater break-in leads to a car chase which leads to a motorcycle chase), Rogue Nation is the series operating at top level. After many personnel shifts, it establishes a core team of Cruise, Simon Pegg, Ving Rhames and a stunning Rebecca Ferguson that will power much of the series going forward, and adds in a little extra Jeremy Renner, as a treat. The sequels are a lot of fun with plenty of indelible moments but the truth is, McQuarrie nailed it in one.Jesse Hassenger

Some people may cherish Mission: Impossible – Fallout for the glimpse it offers of Ethan’s longing for ex-wife Julia (Michelle Monaghan). But for most of us, the film’s appeal lies in the way it builds its terrifying vertical action sequences from a series of electric ups and downs in Paris and London to take the world to the brink of destruction as Ethan thrashes about in a chopper in Kashmir. Writer-director Christopher McQuarrie provides the kind of plot twists that would satisfy a silent serial without losing focus on Ethan’s route through the moral murk. The European road chases, stunts and perilous parkour have a dash of gritty style, even flashes of lightning, as the camera whips past landmark architecture, while a bathroom fight scene against bright white tile is amusingly inventive – plus there’s noir-chic in the low-lit scenes where expositions and betrayals unfold. But the film is best when it loses its cool, with Ethan trying to intercept the detonator to a nuclear bomb, via a monstrously improbable, breath-stoppingly tense helicopter battle in the mountains.Pamela Hutchinson

The penultimate Mission: Impossible is the best franchise instalment because it has the best stunt. But, as its Oscar nominations suggest (visual effects and sound design – the only two ever earned by the series), it is a stunt fuelled not just by Tom Cruise’s kamikaze bravado but by good ol’ VFX and some incredible metal groaning on the soundtrack. It’s the film’s climax. We’re on a gorgeous, posh, blue-and-gold runaway steam train. There’s the obligatory knife fight on the roof and a precisely timed leap to liberty by the baddie, but that’s just the start. A viaduct ahead is blown up, and – just in time – Cruise and Hayley Atwell manage to disengage the engine, which crashes spectacularly into a ravine, per Back to the Future III. They did actually crash a steam train for this, in Derbyshire, where itcaused a bit of a stir. But then –then!– our hero and heroine must leap through the next few carriages as they, too, grindingly slide off the edge of the track and hang for a few moments before the couplers fail and the valley awaits. There’s the kitchen car (soup, peppers, gas hob), the dining carriage (crockery, flames, chairs) and, most perilous of all, the cocktail bar (grand piano). It’s like The Poseidon Adventure in super-speed miniature, a Buster Keaton upside-down nightmare and the most fabulous thing ever.Catherine Shoard

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian