Blue Labour leader Dan Carden to vote against assisted dying bill

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Blue Labour Leader Dan Carden Opposes Assisted Dying Bill Ahead of Crucial Vote"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.4
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Dan Carden, the leader of the Blue Labour group, has announced his intention to vote against the assisted dying bill, marking a significant shift in the ongoing debate surrounding the proposed legislation. This bill aims to legalize assisted dying for mentally competent adults in their final months of life, a topic that has garnered considerable attention and division among lawmakers. As the vote approaches, campaigners and bereaved families, including Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, have rallied to emphasize the urgency of passing the bill, warning that another opportunity to change the law might not arise for at least a decade. Carden articulated his opposition by invoking core Labour values, arguing that legalizing assisted suicide could lead society to favor death over life, diminishing the importance of family, community, and social responsibilities. His concerns are deeply personal, as he reflects on caring for his father during his battle with lung cancer, believing that the proposed legislation could further isolate individuals and erode essential social bonds among communities facing hardships and inadequate public services, particularly in end-of-life care.

As the debate intensifies, supporters of the bill have expressed fears that failing to pass the legislation could prolong suffering for thousands of terminally ill individuals and their families. They have highlighted the extensive scrutiny the bill has undergone since its introduction, with MPs having ample time to consider its implications. The likelihood of MPs shifting their stance on the bill has increased, with around 15 who previously supported or abstained now indicating opposition. Prominent figures, including Labour leader Keir Starmer, continue to advocate for the bill, while others, such as former Prime Minister Gordon Brown, have called it fundamentally flawed. The emotional testimonies from constituents further illustrate the impact of current laws on families, with individuals sharing harrowing experiences of loss and fear under the existing legal framework. As the vote approaches, the contrasting perspectives on assisted dying reflect broader societal values and the profound complexities surrounding end-of-life choices.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The leader of the Blue Labour group has said he will vote against the assisted dying bill – one of the most high-profile switchers – as both sides make their final pleas to MPs before Friday’s crunch vote.

It comes as campaigners and bereaved relatives joined the Labour MP Kim Leadbeater ahead of the third reading vote to urge parliament to back the reforms, saying it would be at least a decade before another chance to change the law.

The bill would legalise assisted dying for mentally competent adults in their final months of life.

Dan Carden, who previously abstained, said it was core Labour vales that drove him to vote against the bill. “Legalising assisted suicide will normalise the choice of death over life, care, respect and love,” he said. “I draw on my own family experience, caring for my dad who died from lung cancer three years ago.

“I genuinely fear the legislation will take us in the wrong direction. The values of family, social bonds, responsibilities, time and community will be diminished, with isolation, atomisation and individualism winning again.”

The MP for Liverpool Walton, whose group seeks to promote culturally conservative or what it says are blue-collar values within the party, added: “For people who live with the reality of rundown public services, particularly palliative end-of-life care, poverty, hardship and broken down communities are a fact of life. They will be impacted very differently. And that’s something the political class doesn’t dare discuss.”

At a press conference on Thursday morning, MPs backing the bill said a failure to pass legislation could condemn thousands of terminally ill people and their families to years of more trauma, secrecy and fear of prosecution.

“It has gone through hours and hours of scrutiny, and colleagues have had this bill since November,” Leadbeater said on Thursday. “If we don’t pass this law tomorrow, it could be another decade before this issue is brought back to parliament. And in that time, how many stories [of suffering] will we hear?”

About 15 MPs who backed the bill or abstained at its second reading have now said they are likely to vote against it. MPs previously backed the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55 in November. Should it pass its third reading on Friday, it will go to the House of Lords.

Keir Starmer has indicated he will continue to back the bill, saying his position on assisted dying is “longstanding and well known”. But the former Labour prime minister Gordon Brown has described Leadbeater’s bill as fundamentally flawed andurged MPs to reject it.

In the office of the Conservative MP and former minister Andrew Mitchell on Thursday, campaigners shared raw testimony of being failed by the current law. Anil Douglas told the story of his father, Ian, who died by suicide after ordering opioids on the dark web.

He was suffering from secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, and no longer able to face the pain, Douglas said. “On the night he died, I found him still alive. I cracked and called the GP, she had a legal obligation to call an ambulance, and soon paramedics arrived.”

They tried to resuscitate his father. “A couple of days later, a police investigation hung over our heads for more than six months. Nothing can prepare you for that experience of grief in real time, that kind of trauma.”

Pamela Fisher, a Church of England lay preacher with terminal breast cancer, said she supported the bill not in spite of her Christian faith but because of it. “I don’t want to die now, but I’m in terror at the prospect of how my final weeks may turn out to be,” she said. “Even the best palliative care has limits.”

Fisher rejected religious objections to assisted dying as misrepresenting Christian values.“My god is not a harsh and controlling god,” she said. “My god is a god of love who invites us to work with him to create conditions of greater compassion [in] society. Religious arguments against the bill also sometimes overlook the Christian concept of free will.”

The Catholic Archbishop of Westminster, Cardinal Vincent Nichols – who is opposed to assisted dying – has previously argued that the suffering of human beings is “an intrinsic part of our human journey, a journey embraced by the eternal word of God, Christ Jesus himself”.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian