Blow to Minns as turf club votes down plan to sell Sydney racecourse to NSW to build 25,000 homes

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"ATC Members Reject Sale of Rosehill Racecourse, Impacting NSW Housing Strategy"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The Australian Turf Club (ATC) members have dealt a significant blow to the New South Wales (NSW) government led by Premier Chris Minns by rejecting a proposed sale of the Rosehill racecourse, which was intended for the development of 25,000 new homes. The government had offered $5 billion for the site as part of its broader housing strategy aimed at addressing a critical housing shortage in Sydney. The proposal was expected to contribute substantially to NSW's target of 337,000 new dwellings by 2029, as outlined in the national housing accord. However, during a recent meeting, 56% of the 7,860 members voted against the sale, highlighting a clear division within the club. This rejection not only represents a setback for the government’s housing agenda but also reflects deeper issues within the ATC regarding trust and the management of racing proceeds, especially under the leadership of Racing NSW's chief executive, Peter V’Landys, who had initially supported the sale.

Premier Minns expressed disappointment at the outcome, describing the proposal as a “gamechanger” and a “once in a lifetime opportunity” that has now been lost. He emphasized that the failure to secure the Rosehill site would also mean that plans for a new metro station aligned with the housing development would be shelved. While he ruled out the option of compulsory acquisition, which he deemed disrespectful to ATC members, Minns assured the public that alternative sites for housing development are being explored. The political ramifications of the failed deal are already being felt, as opposition leader Mark Speakman criticized the Minns government for its lack of decisive action on housing amidst a growing crisis. With the potential for housing development now diminished at Rosehill, the government will need to identify new large-scale sites, with the Canterbury race track being one possibility, although it presents its own set of planning challenges. The outcome raises questions about the future of both the housing strategy and the racing industry in NSW, as the rejection of the sale could hinder efforts to revitalize racing facilities and secure financial stability for the sector.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The recent news regarding the Australian Turf Club's decision against selling the Rosehill racecourse presents several layers of implications for housing development and political strategy in New South Wales. This decision is particularly significant as it directly affects Premier Chris Minns' housing strategy, which aimed to address the pressing need for new homes in Sydney.

Political Implications and Public Perception

The rejection of the sale represents a substantial setback for the Minns government, which had positioned the transaction as a pivotal move to alleviate the housing crisis. By framing the proposal as a "gamechanger," the government sought to inspire confidence in its housing policy. The negative outcome of the vote, with 56% opposing the sale, indicates a potential disconnect between government initiatives and community sentiment. This could lead to a perception of the government as ineffective in addressing housing needs, which might diminish public trust and support.

Economic Considerations

The proposed development was tied to a broader plan to construct 25,000 new homes, which would have contributed significantly to New South Wales' housing targets. The failure to secure the site not only stalls this specific project but also raises questions about the state’s overall housing strategy. The premier's acknowledgment of disappointment suggests an awareness of the economic implications, as continued high housing prices in Sydney could exacerbate social inequalities and limit growth.

Community Reaction and Future Plans

Minns emphasized respect for the wishes of the ATC members, which reflects a consideration for local stakeholders in the decision-making process. However, the government’s need to pivot to alternative sites for housing development may not resonate as positively with the public. This shift could be viewed as an admission of failure, especially if future proposals do not meet the same expectations or do not adequately address housing shortages.

Media Influence and Narrative Control

The article's tone and focus on the Premier's disappointment may serve to shape public discourse around government accountability. It highlights the stakes involved in the decision while subtly urging the community to consider the broader implications of housing shortages. The narrative might aim to rally support for alternative initiatives by framing them as necessary responses to the setback.

Market and Investment Impact

The news could influence real estate markets and investor sentiment regarding housing developments in New South Wales. The failure to secure Rosehill for development might lead to cautious investment strategies, as stakeholders reassess the viability of future projects. This situation could cause fluctuations in related stocks, particularly those tied to construction and real estate.

Conclusion on Manipulative Nature

While the article presents factual information about the vote and its implications, it also emphasizes the political fallout for Premier Minns. This framing could be interpreted as an attempt to steer public opinion toward a narrative of political failure, potentially to support future government actions or proposals. The language used reflects an underlying concern about housing affordability and the effectiveness of governmental responses.

The reliability of this news is high, given the presentation of clear facts and direct quotes from key figures involved. However, the interpretation of these events can vary based on political leanings and public sentiment surrounding the housing crisis.

Unanalyzed Article Content

The Minns government has had a major hole punched in its strategy to boost housing inSydneyafter the Australian Turf Club members voted not to sell Rosehill racecourse, earmarked for a major housing development.

TheNew South Walesgovernment had offered $5bn for the site, and proposed it would accommodate 25,000 new homes and a proposed Metro stop.

The proposal would have made a significant contribution towards the NSW target of 337,000 new dwellings by 2029 that NSW has pledged under the national housing accord.

The vote, conducted at a meeting at Randwick on Tuesday and with an earlier online vote, was soundly rejected by 7,860 members who voted, with 56% against the sale and 44% for it.

The Rosehill site is owned by the members of the ATC – unlike some other race tracks that are on crown land.

The failure to gain endorsement for the $5 bn transaction is a political blow to premierChris Minnswho personally championed the proposal since day one. He had described it as “a gamechanger” and “a once in a lifetime opportunity”.

Sign up for Guardian Australia’s breaking news email

The government had planned to buy the site, build a metro station and then sell development rights to private companies for the housing component.

“Look, I am obviously disappointed in the decision of ATC members, I am not going lie,” Minns said on Tuesday.

“I think this would have been a great opportunity. The fact that it will not be realised is disappointing for the government, the people of NSW, and many ATC members.

“It feels like a golden opportunity has slipped through our fingers.”

The metro stop will also be shelved due to viability, the premier said.

Minns again ruled out compulsory acquisition of Rosehill racecourse, saying that would disrespect the wishes of the members of the ATC.

But he said the government had been working on other sites which would be unveiled soon.

“The reason we are the most expensive city for housing on earth is that we have been too timid on housing for too long,” Minns said.

He promised that despite the failure of this proposal, he would continue to “look outside the box” at proposals to increase housing.

The Rosehill project has come at a political cost. Minn’s enthusiastic pursuit of the Rosehill project led to a referral to the Independent Commission against Corruption, over his personal friendship with an ATC executive. The ICAC did not find any reason to pursue an investigation.

The opposition leader, Mark Speakman, said he respected the democratic processes of the ATC, but said this was another case of a lack of action on housing by the Minns government.

“We have a crisis of housing in NSW. It’s a crisis for young people and for families of NSW.”

Sign up toAfternoon Update

Our Australian afternoon update breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what’s happening and why it matters

after newsletter promotion

The government will now need to find alternative large scale sites. One alternative is to develop the Canterbury race track, but there are more complex planning issues associated with the site and it would not yield the same amount of housing.

There may also be some scope for some development around Rosehill on vacant land owned by the ATC, but this would be on a much smaller scale.

On Monday, Greyhounds NSW announced plans to close the iconic Dapto dog track near Wollongong and there has been speculation that it could be developed for housing.

The failure to endorse the sale will also have implications for the racing industry in NSW and Racing NSW’s chief executive, Peter V’Landys.

Some in the industry saw the potential $5bn windfall as an opportunity to revamp racing facilities in NSW and secure the long term future of horse racing via a trust that would hold about $3bn of the proceeds. Racing currently relies on support from the state government and gambling revenues.

The failure of the deal is a rare setback for V’Landys, one of the most powerful figures in NSW.

The ATC chair, Peter McGuaran, who had also championed the sale, said wagering on animal sports was falling faster than expected and this was creating a serious problem for the racing industry.

He said it would now be a challenge to upgrade the facilities at Rosehill. He said he intended to stay on as chair of the ATC, despite the defeat.

The shifting sands of the deal with the government and concerns about who would control the proceeds have been blamed for the eroding support among ATC members, which include prominent trainers like Gai Waterhouse.

There was a high level of distrust about the intentions of V’Landys, who was a strong proponent of the sale.

In recent weeks he backtracked from an earlier position that Racing NSW should manage the proceeds.

In a bid to win over members concerned about V’landys’ influence, the Racing NSW boss wrote to McGauran this month, confirming the regulator “will not seek to recover any of the net $5 billion in sale proceeds from the ATC”.

The vote was delayed by legal action from Racing NSW. In recent weeks the ATC promised members $1.9bn-worth of upgrades to other Sydney tracks, including turning Warwick Farm into a replacement Group 1 track, as well as giving existing members a $1,000 food and beverage tab once a year for five years.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian