Biden destroyed Harris bid by staying in race too long, top adviser says in book

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Biden's Late Withdrawal from 2024 Race Criticized by Harris's Former Adviser"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 6.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

A new book titled 'Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again' reveals critical insights from a former top aide to Kamala Harris regarding President Biden's impact on her presidential bid. David Plouffe, who previously managed Barack Obama’s successful 2008 campaign, expressed frustration over Biden's late withdrawal from the 2024 election, stating that his prolonged candidacy significantly hindered Harris's campaign. Plouffe described Harris's brief campaign against Donald Trump as a 'fucking nightmare' and emphasized that Biden's decision to run and to stay in the race after a poor debate performance raised serious concerns about his mental acuity and age. He criticized Biden's handling of the situation, suggesting that it not only hurt Harris's chances but also posed a disservice to the Democratic Party and the nation at large.

The book highlights the internal struggles and alarm among Biden’s close allies regarding his cognitive abilities. It recounts how some advisers attempted to shield him from the extent of his decline, with one senior aide admitting they had tried to protect Biden from his own staff's awareness of his deteriorating condition. Prominent Democratic figures, including Barack Obama and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, expressed their concerns directly to Biden, urging him to reconsider his candidacy to preserve his legacy. Despite these warnings, Biden remained adamant about his re-election bid until he finally withdrew on July 21, 2024, subsequently endorsing Harris. However, the authors argue that this late endorsement was insufficient to avert the consequences of his extended candidacy, ultimately facilitating the return of Trump to the White House, which Biden had desperately sought to prevent.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article delves into the implications of Joe Biden's decision to remain in the 2024 presidential race, particularly how it affected Kamala Harris's campaign. David Plouffe, a former aide, provides a critical perspective on Biden's late withdrawal, suggesting that it significantly undermined Harris's chances against Donald Trump. The commentary highlights increasing concerns about Biden's mental acuity and age, which have raised alarms among political insiders and donors alike.

Intent Behind the Publication

The primary aim of this article appears to be to shed light on the internal dynamics and challenges faced by the Democratic Party as it heads into the 2024 election. By featuring critical remarks from a prominent campaign adviser, the piece seeks to provide insight into the frustrations surrounding Biden's candidacy and the impact on other candidates like Harris. This approach may serve to galvanize discourse around the party's leadership and its electoral viability, especially as doubts about Biden's capabilities become more pronounced.

Public Perception Manipulation

The article could be seen as an attempt to influence public opinion regarding Biden’s fitness for office. By focusing on negative assessments from within his own party, it aims to create a narrative of dysfunction and decline, potentially swaying undecided voters or those within the party who may have reservations about Biden's re-election. This could be a strategic move to draw attention away from the party's weaknesses and redirect focus onto Biden's failings.

Hidden Agendas

There may be aspects of the Democratic Party's strategy that are not fully revealed in this article. The emphasis on Biden's shortcomings could be a tactic to prepare the ground for a potential shift in leadership or to rally support for alternative candidates. The internal critiques presented might also serve to distract from other pressing issues within the party or the political landscape.

Credibility Assessment

The reliability of the information hinges on the credibility of the sources cited. David Plouffe's experience lends weight to his opinions, but it's essential to consider the context and potential biases in these claims. The article relies heavily on personal narratives and insider accounts, which, while valuable, can also be influenced by the author's framing and the overall agenda of the publication.

Broader Context and Connections

In comparison to other political analyses, this article aligns with a growing trend of scrutinizing leadership within the Democratic Party, especially as it faces a critical election. There is a wider narrative emerging that questions the viability of older candidates in a rapidly changing political landscape. This aligns with similar discussions across various media outlets that highlight generational shifts in political leadership.

Potential Societal and Economic Impacts

The article could have far-reaching implications for the political landscape, potentially affecting voter turnout and party unity. If public sentiment sways against Biden, it could weaken the Democratic Party's chances in the upcoming election, which in turn could influence economic policies and market stability, depending on the outcome.

Support Base Dynamics

The narrative presented may resonate more with progressive and younger voters who are increasingly advocating for new leadership. Conversely, more traditional Democratic supporters might view this as an unwarranted attack on a sitting president. The article thus targets a specific segment of the electorate that is looking for change and may be disillusioned with the current administration.

Market Influence

While the article may not directly impact stock prices, the sentiment surrounding Biden's leadership could influence investor confidence in sectors sensitive to political stability, such as healthcare and renewable energy. Investors often react to political uncertainty, and narratives that question a leader's capability can lead to fluctuations in market performance.

Geopolitical Relevance

From a global perspective, the article underscores the importance of stable leadership in the U.S. Given the current geopolitical climate, any perceived instability could have implications for international relations and economic agreements. The discourse around Biden's candidacy is thus relevant not only domestically but also in the context of America's role on the world stage.

AI Involvement in Article Production

It is unlikely that artificial intelligence played a direct role in the writing of this article, as it relies heavily on personal insights and human experiences. However, AI could have been employed in the research phase to gather data or analyze public sentiment, but the nuanced opinions expressed suggest a human touch.

In conclusion, the article provides a critical perspective on Biden's candidacy and its implications for the Democratic Party, revealing tensions that could affect the party's future. The insights from Plouffe and the framing of Biden's actions suggest a narrative that may serve specific political purposes.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Joe Biden “totally fucked us” by leaving it too late to drop out of the 2024 US presidential election, a former top campaign aide toKamala Harrishas told the authors of a new book.

David Plouffe, who was manager of Barack Obama’s winning 2008 campaign and a senior adviser in his White House, was drafted in to help Harris’s bid for president after the declining Biden withdrew from the race last summer.

Harris’s 107-day sprint against Donald Trump was “a fucking nightmare”, Plouffe is quoted as saying by authors Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson inOriginal Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover-up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again. A copy was obtained by the Guardian.

“And it’s all Biden,” Plouffe adds, reflecting on the former US president’s decisions to run for re-election and then to cling on for more than three weeks after a catastrophic debate performance against Trump raise questions about his mental acuity and age. “He totally fucked us.”

Plouffe, along with some other former Obama staffers, haspreviously been criticalof Biden and his role in the Democratic defeat. In the wake of Harris’ loss he posted a message on X – formerly known as Twitter – that the Harris campaign had begun in a “deep hole”. Helater deletedhis account.

The book describes how Plouffe had received calls from donors worried about Biden’s diminishing energy, cognitive skills and ability to deliver a speech. He in turn pressed the White House and Democratic party if they felt sure that the then president could win another election and was repeatedly told he could.

ButTapper, chief Washington correspondent for CNN, and Thompson, a national political correspondent for Axios, spoke to around 200 people for the book, including members of Congress and White House and campaign insiders. Some had been sounding the alarm about Biden’s mental acuity and about desperate efforts by his close staff and allies to hide the extent of his deterioration.

One senior aide, who quit the White House because they did not think Biden should run, admits to the authors that “we attempted to shield him from his own staff so many people didn’t realize the extent of the decline beginning in 2023”.

“I loveJoe Biden. When it comes to decency, there are few in politics like him. Still, it was a disservice to the country and to the party for his family and advisers to allow him to run again.”

A prominent Democratic strategist says of Biden’s determination to seek re-election: “It was an abomination. He stole an election from the Democratic party; he stole it from the American people.”

Original Sin is one of several eagerly awaited books about the 2024 election and an alleged White House conspiracy.

Biden, 82, seemingly tried to preempt its revelations last week with media appearances on BBC Radio 4’s Today program and ABC’s talkshow The View. Biden has signed with Creative Artists Agency for representation andhired communications strategist Chris Meagherto help burnish his public reputation.

But the 27 June 2024debate in Atlantawas no anomaly, the book argues. Since at least 2022 Biden has been increasingly prone to lose his train of thought and struggle to remember the names of top aides. His speeches can be incoherent and difficult to hear. When he proved incapable of delivering a two-minute video address without stumbling, aides filmed him with two cameras so the edit would be less obvious.

Original Sin tells how prominent figures tried to intervene in various ways. Obama visited the White House in 2023 and warned Biden: “Just make sure you can win the race.”

Ari Emanuel, a Hollywood powerbroker and significant Democratic donor, yelled at longtime Biden ally Ron Klain: “Joe Biden cannot run for re-election! He needs to drop out! He can’t win! What’s the plan B?” Klain admitted there was no plan B.

AndChuck Schumer, the Democratic leader in the Senate, confronted the president after the debate last July at his home in Rehoboth, Delaware, and appealed to his desire to preserve his legacy. He warned Biden that, he if stayed in the race and lost to Trump then 50 years of “amazing, beautiful work goes out the window. But it’s worse than that – you will go down in American history as one of the darkest figures.”

On their way out, the book reports, Biden put his hands on Schumer’s shoulders and told him: “You have bigger balls than anyone I’ve ever met.”

Biden stepped aside on 21 July and quickly endorsed Harris but it was too late, the authors contend. He had already helpedusher in the fatethat he most wanted to avoid: the return of Trump to the White House.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian