Between ‘rollover UK’ and ‘retaliatory China’: will EU hardball secure trade deal with US?

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"EU's Strategy to Secure US Trade Deal Amidst Rising Tariff Tensions"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In Brussels, there is a growing sense of optimism regarding the European Union's strategy to secure a trade deal with the United States amid escalating tensions. While the UK has quickly sought to mitigate the impact of Donald Trump’s tariffs through a recent agreement, the EU has opted for a more assertive approach. A Brussels source described the EU's position as balancing between the 'rollover UK' and 'retaliatory China.' The stakes are significant, with £706 billion in transatlantic trade at risk, alongside concerns about the implications of the US's aggressive tariff policies on the global rules-based system that underpins Western democracy. A diplomat noted that Trump's appeal lies in power, and the EU's current strategy could lead to a situation where it might not secure a deal, raising questions about the future of international norms and regulations related to employment rights and free speech if the EU does not stand firm against the US demands.

The EU's approach is fraught with risks as it navigates a complex landscape marked by Trump's threats to impose tariffs on EU imports, with a critical deadline approaching in July. Although EU member states are currently united in their resistance to capitulate to US demands, the potential for retaliation from member states looms large if the situation escalates. Chief negotiator Maroš Šefčovič has expressed cautious optimism about reaching a deal while acknowledging the ongoing preparations for a trade war. The EU is also engaging in discussions with various countries, including India and Australia, to establish new trade agreements as a counterbalance to US tariffs. The overarching concern in Brussels is the shift in the global trade order, with the US's behavior being likened to that of a developing nation reliant on tariffs for revenue. This reflects a broader anxiety regarding the changing dynamics in international trade and the potential long-term impacts on European businesses and the transatlantic alliance.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article presents a critical look at the ongoing trade negotiations between the EU and the US, highlighting the EU's strategy in the face of Donald Trump's tariffs. The narrative suggests a growing confidence in Brussels that the EU's hardline approach may be effective in securing a favorable trade deal. However, it also outlines the risks associated with this strategy.

Strategic Positioning of the EU

The EU is depicted as strategically positioning itself between the UK, which is opting for a softer approach by negotiating a trade deal, and China, which is engaged in a retaliatory trade stance. This positioning indicates that the EU is trying to carve out a unique identity in the global trade landscape, asserting its influence and resisting what it perceives as threats to the international rules-based system.

Risks of Hardball Tactics

The article highlights the high stakes involved, including the potential impact on employment rights and democratic values if the EU fails to stand firm against Trump's demands. The diplomat quoted expresses skepticism about the EU's ability to negotiate effectively, suggesting that the lack of a deal could have dire implications for international relations and the global economy.

Potential Consequences of NATO Summit

A significant event looming on the horizon is the NATO summit scheduled for June 24, where tensions could escalate further. The article implies that Trump's attitude toward NATO, particularly his criticism of "freeloading allies," could complicate negotiations and lead to a more confrontational approach.

Perception and Public Sentiment

The tone of the article suggests that there is a shared resolve among EU member states to resist capitulation to Trump's demands, which may resonate positively with the public. This collective stance could be seen as a rallying point for European unity against external pressures, particularly from the US.

Market and Political Implications

In terms of market reaction, the article could influence investor sentiment, particularly regarding companies that might be affected by tariffs or trade policies. Investors may become wary of stocks in sectors vulnerable to trade disruptions, such as automotive and steel industries.

Global Power Dynamics

The article touches on broader themes of global power dynamics, suggesting that the EU's actions could either reinforce or undermine the international order. This is particularly relevant given current geopolitical tensions and the rise of authoritarianism in various regions.

Use of AI in Article Composition

While it is not explicitly stated, it's possible that AI tools might have been utilized to analyze data or draft certain sections of the article. AI models could assist in parsing complex trade information or summarizing diplomatic sentiments. However, the article maintains a human touch in its narrative and analysis, which suggests that AI was likely not the sole author.

In conclusion, the article effectively communicates the EU's precarious position in international trade negotiations and the potential ramifications of its strategies. The overarching narrative seems to aim at reinforcing EU solidarity while cautioning against the risks of a confrontational approach with the US.

Unanalyzed Article Content

In Brussels’ corridors of power, quiet optimism is growing that the EU’s hardball strategy to secure a US trade deal is working. While Britain quickly moved to try to cushion the impact of Donald Trump’s tariffs witha deal agreed last month– and US-Chinese relations area tit-for-tat situation– the EU has taken a different stance. “We are positioning ourselves between ‘rollover UK’ and ‘retaliatory China’,” said a Brussels source.

The stakes are not just the £706bn in transatlantic trade between the EU and US but the fallout from what diplomats and businesses say is a dangerous assault on the global rules-based system that governs western democracy.

“The only thing that appeals to Trump is power. Amid all the nausea and uncertainty here, there is a significant chance the EU will go the whole way and not do a deal,” said a diplomat in the Belgian capital.

“If the EU doesn’t stand up to Trump or demand the rigours of rules, the question will be: what is left of the international rules based system?” the source added, noting the risk to employment rights, free speech, social welfare and public care.

The EU’s steadfast strategy is high-risk, and has weeks to play out before the 90-day pause in Trump’s threat to impose 20% tariffs on all EU imports ends in July. He has already slapped a 10% tariff on all exports, with more on autos and steel, which this weekwent to 50%.

“If in the end, if we are the only ones on the pitch, people will start to say we should have been more like the Chinese,” said one EU official, with demands for retaliation expected to arise “very quickly from member states”.

The biggest pothole in what threatens to be a bumpy road ahead may bea Nato summit on 24 Junewhen Trump, who has shown visceral antipathy towards the EU, may find fault in what he considers freeloading allies.

Right now, EU member states are united in their resolve not to capitulate in the face of his demands, which include the removal of non-tariff barriers such as food standards.

“What the US is doing has brought us together, and there’s a sense of urgency of that cooperation within the 27 that is quite important,” says one diplomat.

There is even a growing acceptance that US tariffs of more than 10% are a long-term reality. “Ideally less than 10%, so it doesn’t look like we have rolled over,” says one Brussels official. Before Trump took office for the second time the average tariff on US imports in the EU was about 2.5%.

The EU’s chief negotiator, Maroš Šefčovič, said on multiple occasions this week that he was “optimistic” a deal would be done, but back at base, trade war preparations continue. “We are keeping the gun on the shelf. We don’t want to use it, but we want them to know it is there,” said one diplomat.

Šefčovič said on Friday he had held another call with the US secretary of commerce, Howard Lutnick. “Our time and effort fully invested, as delivering forward-looking solutions remains a top EU priority. Staying in permanent contact,” he wrote on X.

Meanwhile, twin talks took place this week in Paris at the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and in Washington with a team of EU officials led by Tomas Baert, trade adviser to theEuropean Commissionpresident, Ursula von der Leyen.

Those talks helped “clean the slate, clear the table”, Šefčovič told a conference organised by the European Policy Centre, a thinktank, on Thursday in Brussels.

He added that he had also discussed the continued threat of sectoral tariffs on pharmaceuticals and semiconductors with the US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris.

Šefčovič said his message was that the US and the EU had mutual interests in re-industrialisation on both sides of the Atlantic, and in minimising China’s unstoppable rise in key sectors such as electric vehicles and steel.

“Any obstacle in the middle of the Atlantic would simply make them less competitive and more vulnerable. This is the diplomatic, political but also very technical discussions we are having,” he said.

Up to now negotiations have been somewhat hampered by the parallel universe occupied by the US president, and White House and EU officials.

Sign up toBusiness Today

Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning

after newsletter promotion

Last month, Trump, out of the blue, threatened and then unthreatened to slap a 50% tariff on all EU imports, claiming Brussels was dragging its feet“to put it mildly”.

“This came as a surprise to Maroš, because he had been in talks since February,” said one source. “But because this is an imperial court, it is the emperor who will decide when talks are happening.”

The volatility in the transatlantic relationship on European business is unprecedented.

“I have been here 10 years and I have never seen this level of nervousness, not during the pandemic, not after the invasion of Ukraine,” said a director at one trade group representing dozens of multinationals in Brussels, who declined to be named.

Luisa Santos, the deputy director general at Confederation of Business Europe, which represents 42 national business federations, said trade would, like water, find its course but investment could prove the collateral damage.

“The whole basis of trade is WTO [World Trade Organization] rules,” she said. “We agreed on the rules and they were accepted the consequences. Now the rule is the power game: ‘I will impose what I think is best for me, and the bigger players with more power determine the rules and that is a huge change.”

Santos added: “I think the biggest shock in Europe is that we were supposed to be the traditional allies. But now we are basically put on the same basket as China.”

Kyle Martin, the vice-president of European affairs at the General Aviation Manufacturers Association, whose members include Boeing and Airbus, said tariffs would end a 45-year-old US-EU agreement that aviation construction, which relies on a global supply chain, was duty-free.

A Boeing 787 gets its front fuselage from Italy, its wings from Japan and doors from France, with assembly at home in Seattle, he pointed out.

“I don’t see this having a positive [outcome] for either Boeing or Airbus or any other manufacturer. Everyone will be impacted because everyone’s got an interconnected supply chain.”

But while negotiations with the US continue, new EU agreements with India, Thailand, the Philippines, Indonesia, South Africa and Australia are also on the cards.

Ultimately it is the profound shift in the world order that is bothering many in Brussels.

The US was behaving “like a very unevolved state”, said one EU source, like a developing country that relied on customs duties for national revenue in the absence of income tax, corporate tax and VAT. “Maybe this is what Trump wants, a smaller, leaner weaker state where everybody has to pay for themselves,” they said.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian