Beards may be dirtier than toilets – but all men should grow one | Polly Hudson

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Debate Over Beard Hygiene Sparks Discussion on Their Aesthetic Benefits"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 4.9
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

In a recent discourse about beards, Polly Hudson challenges the negative perceptions surrounding them, particularly in light of a Washington Post report suggesting that beards might harbor more germs than toilets. While acknowledging the findings, Hudson expresses her unwavering love for beards and dismisses the anti-beard sentiment as mere propaganda. She highlights a study from the University of Leicester, where researcher Primrose Freestone offers a more balanced view on the microbial presence in beards. Freestone notes that the microbial population on skin varies significantly based on multiple factors, including temperature and humidity, and emphasizes that regular washing can effectively minimize microbial buildup. This nuanced perspective reassures Hudson and reinforces her belief in the aesthetic and social advantages of beards.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

It’s a convenient truth of our time that if you Google for long enough, you will eventually find the answer you want. In other words, there’s a lot of anti-beard propaganda out there, and I’m not falling for any of it. I love beards. So I keep scrolling.

Past the recentWashington Postreportthat some toilets contain fewer germs than the average beard (that’s pretty much true ofphone screens, and we happily rub them on our faces). Not even pausing on an investigation into whether it would be hygienic toscan canines and humansin the same MRI machine, which found most beards contained more microbes and bacteria than dog fur. La la la, I’m not listening.

Finally, a link worth clicking – a researcher at the University of Leicester supplying a more nuanced picture – AKA My Truth.Primrose Freestone, senior lecturer in clinical microbiology, says: “The microbial population on skin varies by location and is influenced by factors such as temperature, pH, humidity and nutrient availability.” She points out that regular washing “removes dirt, oils, allergens and dead skin, helping prevent microbial buildup”.

Phew. Although germs be damned, nothing could put me off anyway. All men look better with beards and I will die on that hill; my husband instantly resembles an estate agent without his. Beards also give men an easy advantage in life (come on, they needed one): those with them are instinctively more trustworthy than their bald-chinned counterparts.

I would go so far as to suggest that men without beards are ungrateful. If you’re able to, why wouldn’t you embrace an aesthetic that requires less effort than the alternative – as in, literally no effort – and will not only make you more handsome generally, but also, as the years roll by, disguise what used to be your jawline? Beards are free, painless plastic surgery. A hairy little glow-up, available to most, regardless of wealth or status. The great leveller, right under your nose this whole time. Genuinely rude not to.

Polly Hudson is a freelance writer

Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in ourletterssection, pleaseclick here.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian