Autistic people and experts voice alarm at RFK’s ‘terrible’ approach to condition

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Experts and Advocates Criticize Robert F. Kennedy's Approach to Autism and Proposed Policy Cuts"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Autism advocates and experts are expressing serious concerns over Robert F. Kennedy's approach to autism following his recent comments and proposed policies. Kennedy, in his capacity as health secretary, has suggested a significant expansion in the monitoring of autistic individuals' health records through a large-scale study that would utilize private medical information from federal and commercial databases. This initiative is set against the backdrop of leaked plans indicating substantial cuts to disability services under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which would eliminate support for education, research, and services for individuals with disabilities. Experts like Daniel Geschwind, a professor at UCLA, have warned that these changes could severely hinder progress in autism research and support, effectively halting advancements at a critical time when researchers are poised to make significant strides in understanding the condition. Furthermore, Kennedy's comments during his press conference, which inaccurately suggested that autistic individuals do not contribute to society, have only intensified the backlash from the autism community, highlighting the negative implications of such rhetoric on public perception and policy-making.

The proposed cuts and the framing of autism as an epidemic linked to environmental toxins, including vaccines, have been widely criticized as alarmist and unfounded. Researchers assert that genetics account for the vast majority of autism cases, with only a few non-genetic factors potentially influencing its development. The misinformation surrounding vaccines, which Kennedy appears to perpetuate through his association with David Geier—who has a controversial history regarding autism and vaccination—has sparked outrage among professionals in the field. Many, including autistic individuals themselves, emphasize the importance of focusing on support and resources for the autistic community rather than scapegoating them or misrepresenting their experiences. The ongoing cuts to Medicaid and educational support, which disproportionately affect disabled individuals, are viewed as far more pressing threats than the speculative claims about autism's causes. As advocates rally against these policies, they stress the necessity of protecting the rights and dignity of autistic individuals, urging for a shift in focus toward meaningful support rather than harmful narratives.

TruthLens AI Analysis

The article highlights significant concerns from autism experts and the autistic community regarding Robert F. Kennedy's approach to autism as the newly appointed health secretary. His proposed initiatives, including the use of private medical records for a large-scale autism study and cuts to disability services, have sparked outrage and fear among those affected by autism and their advocates.

Concerns Over Health Monitoring and Data Use

Kennedy's plan to create a health registry tracking autistic Americans raises alarms about privacy and the ethical implications of using private medical records. Experts warn that this could lead to misuse of sensitive information, and the focus on monitoring rather than support could detract from genuine efforts to improve the lives of autistic individuals.

Impact of Proposed Cuts to Services

The leaked draft proposing cuts to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services suggests a significant reduction in support for people with disabilities. This includes funding for education and research, crucial areas for advancing understanding and support for autism. Experts argue that these cuts would halt progress in autism research and negatively impact the quality of life for many individuals and families.

Misrepresentation of Autism

Kennedy's comments during his first press conference, which inaccurately stated that autistic people do not contribute to society, have stirred controversy. Such statements reflect a broader misunderstanding of autism and can perpetuate stigma. Experts argue that the real issues facing the autistic community stem from lack of support and funding, rather than the condition itself.

Erosion of Rights for People with Disabilities

The article suggests that there is a broader trend of diminishing rights for people with autism and disabilities. The connection to previous administrations, particularly the Trump administration's cuts to research related to diversity and inclusion, highlights ongoing challenges within the funding and support systems for these communities.

Potential Societal and Economic Impacts

The proposed changes could have far-reaching effects on society, potentially leading to increased discrimination and marginalization of autistic individuals. Economically, cuts to services may result in higher long-term costs for healthcare and social services, as untreated autism can lead to more significant challenges down the line.

Support from Specific Communities

This article is likely to resonate with disability rights advocates, autism organizations, and families affected by autism who are concerned about the implications of Kennedy's policies. It serves as a rallying point for those who demand better support and understanding for autistic individuals.

Market Relevance

While this article may not directly impact stock markets, it could influence sectors related to healthcare and disability services. Companies involved in autism research or support services might be affected by the funding cuts, which could alter their operations and future prospects.

The article provides a critical perspective on current policies affecting the autistic community, emphasizing the need for informed and compassionate approaches. It appears to be credible, given the expertise quoted and the serious implications of the discussed policies. However, the framing may also serve specific agendas within the ongoing discourse around autism and disability rights.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Autism experts and autistic people are pushing back on Robert F Kennedy’s “terrible” approach to autism as the health secretary plans more expansive monitoring of autistic people’s health records and proposes cuts to disability services.

A huge study on autism proposed by Kennedy will draw upon private medical records from federal and commercial databases, and a new health registry will track autistic Americans, CBS Newsreportedon Monday.

A draft of proposed cuts to the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), leaked on Wednesday, would alsoeliminatesupport for people with disabilities in the US, including education, research and services.

“It’s going to have an enormous chilling effect,” said Daniel Geschwind, professor and director of the UCLA Center for Autism Research and Treatment.

Researchers were “poised to make big advances in autism”, yet these cuts and harmful approaches will make those advances “stop in their tracks”, he said.

The moves come after Kennedyclaimed incorrectly, in his first press conference as health secretary last week, that autistic people do not contribute to society or lead fulfilled lives and that autism “destroys” families.

Researchers say a lack of support, including the Trump administration’s proposed and existing cuts to health insurance, research and special education, are the real challenges for individuals and families living with autism.

“There’s a larger erosion of rights for people with autism and people with disabilities,” said Dora Raymaker, a research associate professor focused on autism at Portland State University.

The Trump administration has halted key research on autism through itsbanon research and services related to diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility.

“The withdrawal of funding for research is going to dramatically slow down the acquisition of new knowledge,” said Stephen Shore, professor of special education at Adelphi University of New York.

About 15 million people with disabilitiesrelyon Medicaid in the US, yet the Republican-controlled Congress has proposed slashing Medicaid by nearly a third over the next decade.

The Trump administration has also proposed cuts to the Department of Education, which supports more than 7 million disabled students. Trump hassaidKennedy will oversee services for students with disabilities, an unusual switch from the education department to HHS.

“That is going to present a major challenge to special education,” Shore said. “We stand to lose as much as half a century of progress.” The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act was first enacted in 1974.

One in 31 eight-year-olds received an autism diagnosis as of 2022, according to a newstudyby the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The report noted that the slight rise in diagnoses is due to improvements in diagnosing autism, though it remainsunder-diagnosed, and more awareness of what autism is – contradicting Kennedy’s claims.

In a 10 April cabinet meeting, Kennedy unveiled “a massive testing and research effort” for autism.

“By September, we will know what has caused the autism epidemic and we’ll be able to eliminate those exposures,” he said.

He hired David Geier to oversee the research attempting to link autism to vaccination, especially to the measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine. In 2011, the state of Marylandfoundthat Geier was practicing medicine without a license, including prescribing medications to block puberty among autistic children.

While it was reasonable to investigate whether vaccines had a role in autism, “the question has been asked and answered many dozens of times,” said Geschwind.

Instead, genetics underlie about 95% of autism cases,researchshows.

“The evidence is overwhelming,” Geschwind said. Inherited genetic factors contribute at least 80%, and another 10 to 15% are attributed to non-inherited genetic factors, he said.

And while autism is often diagnosed in early childhood – around the same time that children receive routine vaccinations – it develops in utero during fetal brain development.

In that time, “there’s very, very little room for what are called ‘maternal’ or ‘shared environmental effects’,” Geschwind said.

One of the rare non-genetic factors that may lead to autism is infection with rubella during pregnancy. Rubella is one of the three viruses prevented by the MMR vaccine currently targeted by Kennedy.

Yet Kennedy has pointed to an “environmental toxin” causing an “epidemic” of “preventable disease”, and he hasclaimedthat it “dwarfs” the Covid pandemic.

But autism spectrum disorder is a neurological and developmental disorder, not a disease. It “affects how people interact with others, communicate, learn, and behave”,accordingto the US National Institutes of Health.

“Epidemic” is also an “alarmist” and inaccurate word to use, said Shore. The word usually refers to infectious diseases that progressively worsen over the course of illness.

“It’s a lack of awareness on his part as to who autistic people are,” said Shore, who is autistic, ofKennedy’s characterizations of autistic people.

“It feels terrible. It’s attacking me – they’re attacking autistic individuals for no reason at all. Autistic people have a lot to contribute to society. The focus should be on the need to support autistic individuals and people with special needs in general.”

Scapegoating autistic individuals, like attacks on trans people, was “using people’s fear of something” to “advance some other agenda”, said Raymaker, who is autistic.

There are immediate harms – “people feel awful,” she said. “You can terrify people, you can oppress them,” she said. But at the same time, “you can’t unwind” the progress made over recent decades toward understanding and supporting autistic people, she said.

Responding to Kennedy’s comments “is like being asked to react to somebody who is a flat-Earther or somebody who believes in a pre-Copernican theory of planetary motion”, she said. “It’s hard to respond to something that is fiction.

“What is this distracting us from?” Raymaker questioned, pointing to cuts on health insurance, services, and research as a greater threat: “I’m a lot more concerned about immediate threats that are coming from the cuts.”

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian