Australia mushroom trial live: defence set to conclude closing address in murder trial of Erin Patterson

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Defense Concludes Closing Argument in Erin Patterson's Murder Trial"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.0
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

The trial of Erin Patterson, accused of murdering her in-laws and her estranged husband's aunt, has entered a critical phase as defense lawyer Colin Mandy SC prepares to conclude his closing address. In the courtroom, Mandy highlighted discrepancies in the prosecution's case, particularly regarding the testimony of Patterson's online friend, Christine Hunt. He argued that Hunt's evidence was selectively chosen to support the prosecution's narrative while ignoring other relevant facts, such as Patterson’s stated religious beliefs. Mandy asserted that Hunt, who testified about Patterson's atheism, was not part of a smaller Facebook group chat where Patterson expressed frustrations about her in-laws, thereby suggesting that the prosecution was manipulating evidence to sway the jury's perception of Patterson's character. He emphasized that the prosecution's claim that Patterson intended to kill her estranged husband by inviting him to the lunch was unfounded and absurd, urging the jury to view the evidence critically.

As the trial progresses, Justice Christopher Beale has informed the jury that they will receive instructions beginning Tuesday, which may extend into the following Wednesday. Once the judge's charge is completed, the jury will deliberate on Patterson's fate. The charges against her include three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder, all stemming from a lunch incident in July 2023 that allegedly involved poisoning with death cap mushrooms. While the prosecution contends that Patterson acted with murderous intent, the defense maintains that any poisoning was accidental. The case has drawn significant attention, and the outcome will depend heavily on the jury's interpretation of the evidence presented by both sides during this high-profile trial.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Mandy turns to the evidence of one of Patterson’s online friends, Christine Hunt.

He says Hunt was not part of the smaller Facebook group chatwhere Patterson messaged friends about her in-laws, Don and Gail.

Mandy says Hunt was asked about Patterson’s religious views while those in the smaller group chat were not. He says this is an example of the prosecution picking and choosing evidence that suits them and ignoring others.

Hunt previously testified that Patterson told a wider Facebook group she was an atheist.

“Erin Patterson was not an atheist,” Mandy says.

The jurors have entered the court room in Morwell.

Justice Christopher Beale tells the jury he will begin instructing them on Tuesday, before they begin their deliberations. He says his instructions, called the judge’s charge, will take two days.

“I’m working hard to try and compress it,” he says.

Beale says Patterson’s defence lawyer, Colin Mandy SC, will conclude his closing address today.

Here’s what the jury heard yesterday:

Patterson’s defence lawyer,Colin MandySC, said his client was “not on trial for being a liar”. He told jurors the court was not one of “moral judgment”.

The prosecution’s case that Patterson wanted her estranged husband,Simon, to attend the lunch so she could kill him was “absurd”, Mandy said.

The defence said the jury should reject the evidence from the sole surviving lunch guest,Ian Wilkinson, that Patterson served her guests on four large grey plates while eating from an orangey-tan coloured plate. Mandy said Ian was “honestly mistaken”.

Mandy said the December 2022 Facebook group chat messages, where Patterson said her in-laws were a “lost cause”, were being used by the prosecution as a distraction from the evidence in the case. He said the messages, which related to a disagreement over child support withSimon, stood out because they were about the only disagreement between Patterson and her in-laws.

Mandy says online searches about death cap mushrooms – discovered on a computer police seized from Patterson’s house – showed his client’s “idle curiosity” and was not a person “carefully studying this information”.

Welcome to day 35 ofErin Patterson’s triple murder trial.

Patterson’s defence lawyer, Colin Mandy SC, will continue delivering his closing address to the jury when the trial resumes from 10.30am.

Justice Christopher Beale has told the jury he will begin instructing them on Monday, before their deliberations. He said this “could spill” into next Wednesday. Once this is concluded, the jury will retire to consider its verdict.

Patterson, 50, faces three charges of murder and one charge of attempted murder relating to a beef wellington lunch she served at her house in Leongatha, in regionalVictoria, on 29 July 2023.

She is accused of murdering her in-laws,DonandGail Patterson, and her estranged husband’s aunt,Heather Wilkinson. The attempted murder charge relates to Heather’s husband,Ian.

She has pleaded not guilty to the charges.

The prosecution alleges Patterson deliberately poisoned her lunch guests with “murderous intent”, but her lawyers say the poisoning was a tragic accident.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian