Attack on London: Hunting the 7/7 Bombers review – finally, Netflix makes a great, serious documentary

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Netflix's Documentary Explores the 7/7 Bombings and Their Aftermath"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 8.2
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Netflix's latest documentary, "Attack on London: Hunting the 7/7 Bombers," marks a significant departure from the platform's typically sensationalist approach, showcasing a newfound maturity in tackling serious subject matter. This four-part series commemorates the 20th anniversary of the devastating 7/7 bombings in London, which resulted in the deaths of 52 individuals and left over 700 injured. The documentary meticulously recounts the events of that day, utilizing a combination of phone images, news footage, reconstructions, and firsthand accounts from survivors and victims' families. The emotional weight of the narrative is palpable, drawing viewers into the chaos and horror experienced during the attacks. Personal testimonies, such as that of Daniel Biddle, who lost his legs in the Edgware Road bombing, provide a chilling insight into the moments leading up to and following the explosions, highlighting the panic and confusion that gripped the city. One survivor recalls receiving a text from her boyfriend confirming the presence of bombs just before the bus she was on was detonated, illustrating the personal tragedies intertwined with the broader event.

The documentary goes beyond mere recounting of the attacks to delve into the extensive investigation that followed, which was unprecedented in scale within the UK. As the first suicide bombings on British soil, the attacks prompted a complex response from law enforcement, who initially struggled to comprehend the nature of the threat they faced. The series features interviews with key figures, including Eliza Manningham-Buller, the former head of MI5, and former Prime Minister Tony Blair, who addresses the contentious link between the Iraq War and the bombings. The narrative also explores the societal impact on the Muslim community in Britain, reflecting on the aftermath of the attacks and the prejudices that arose in their wake. The documentary's strength lies in its detailed portrayal of both the criminal investigation and the human stories that emerged, ultimately balancing the focus between the perpetrators and the survivors, making it a compelling and respectful tribute to those affected by the tragedy.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Netflix is not always known for its restraint in the documentary genre, but with its outstanding recent filmGrenfell: Uncovered, and now Attack on London: Hunting the 7/7 Bombers, it appears to be finding a new maturity and seriousness in the field. There have been plenty of recent documentaries on the subject of the attacks and the sprawling investigation that followed – no surprise, given that it is the 20th anniversary this week – but there is still real depth to be found here.

Over four parts, this thorough series unravels the initial attacks on the London transport system, which killed 52 people and injured more than 700, then follows that febrile month into the failed bombings of 21 July, and then thepolice shooting of the innocent Jean Charles de Menezes, a day later. The first 25 minutes or so simply recount those first attacks, compiling the story using phone pictures, news footage, occasional reconstructions, the infamous photographs of the injured pouring out of tube stations and accounts from survivors and the families of victims. Though it is by now a familiar story, this evokes the fear, confusion and panic of that day in heart-racing detail.

In those details, it is unsparing and frequently horrifying.Daniel Biddle lost his legs in the explosionat Edgware Road. His memory of locking eyes with the man who would shortly detonate the bomb in his bag is chilling, and his account of his fight to survive is as gripping as it is brutal. Others talk about the chaos, the noise, the screaming. One woman, who had managed to jump on the 30 bus near Tavistock Square in all of the transport disarray, recounts getting a text from her boyfriend at the time, saying: “You were right, they were bombs.” She had just put her phone back in her pocket after reading it, she says, when the bus exploded.

Those attacks led to the largest criminal investigation ever seen in the UK, which is the primary focus of all four episodes. These were the first suicide bombings to take place on British soil, and police did not know, immediately, that the bombers had also blown themselves up. The revelation about how they came to suspect this – from evidence gathered in one of the tube carriages – is gruesome and fascinating. Explosives expert Cliff Todd talks of material and techniques he had never seen before, and the work that went into tracking down those responsible – and attempting to prevent further attacks – is astonishing in its scale and reach.

This is not simply a police procedural – and that strengthens it greatly. It is impressively comprehensive, taking in the political and media climate of the time. There are interviews with Eliza Manningham-Buller, then director general of MI5, as well as the former prime minister Tony Blair. It even puts the crucial question to Blair: did the invasion of Iraq in 2003 lead directly to these attacks in Britain? His answer is politician-like and broad, but at least it asks the question, and offers context to attacks that did not happen in a vacuum.

Another survivor,Mustafa Kurtuldu, recalls his experience of being on the tube near Aldgate when his train was blown up. When he was finally removed from the carriage and taken out of the station, police searched his bag. There is footage of an appearance on GMTV, just days later, when the presenter asks him how he feels about the attacks, “as a Muslim”. When the investigation moves to Beeston, in Leeds – where two of the four attackers were from – a youth worker in the Muslim community talks about the realisation that, as after 9/11, he would be asked, once more, to apologise for the actions of extremists.

The third episode deals with the failed attacks on 21 July. There are eyewitness accounts of the explosions that went wrong – chilling and eerie, in their own way – the subsequent hunt for the four men who escaped is, again, astonishing in its scope. The next day, the 27-year-old Brazilian electrician Jean Charles de Menezes was on his way to work when he was described as behaving in an “edgy” manner by police who had mistakenly identified him as a suspect. He was shot dead. One of the officers who pulled the trigger speaks here, his identity disguised.

Again, the strength of Attack on London is in the details. When officers finally caught up with Yassin Omar – who had attempted to blow up Warren Street and had fled to Birmingham disguised in a burqa – he was standing in a bath with a backpack on. Fittingly, though, this does not end with the attackers, but with the survivors and their relatives. It strikes a careful balance throughout.

Attack on London: Hunting the 7/7 Bombers is on Netflix now.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian