Asos customers banned for being ‘serial returners’ say it is ‘deeply concerning’

TruthLens AI Suggested Headline:

"Asos Customers Express Concerns Over Account Closures Due to Return Policy Changes"

View Raw Article Source (External Link)
Raw Article Publish Date:
AI Analysis Average Score: 7.8
These scores (0-10 scale) are generated by Truthlens AI's analysis, assessing the article's objectivity, accuracy, and transparency. Higher scores indicate better alignment with journalistic standards. Hover over chart points for metric details.

TruthLens AI Summary

Customers of Asos, the online retail giant, have expressed their frustration after receiving notifications that their accounts have been closed due to excessive returns, which the company claims breaches its updated 'fair use' policy. This policy was revised last September to impose fees on those who frequently return large quantities of items. Many affected customers, including Tskenya-Sarah Frazer, have voiced their concerns, arguing that online shopping is essential for individuals with specific needs, such as those who are tall, plus-sized, or neurodivergent. Frazer highlighted that the inconsistency in sizing is a significant factor contributing to her returns, making it challenging for her to find the right fit. She criticized Asos for deactivating accounts without prior warning or transparency, stating that this practice is not only unfair but also discriminatory against certain groups who rely on online shopping for their unique body types and sensory needs.

Additional customers have shared similar experiences on social media, illustrating the confusion caused by inconsistent sizing in Asos's products. One user demonstrated how two bodysuits labeled as medium were drastically different in size, further emphasizing the challenges consumers face when navigating the retailer's offerings. In response, Asos confirmed that the closure of accounts was limited to a small number of customers whose behavior consistently violated the fair use policy, underscoring the company's commitment to maintaining free returns for the majority of its clientele. Consumer lawyer Gary Rycroft stated that while businesses can set thresholds for returns, they must ensure compliance with consumer protection laws, especially regarding faulty or misrepresented items. He noted that discrepancies in sizing could fall under the category of 'not as described,' thus preserving consumers' rights in such cases.

TruthLens AI Analysis

You need to be a member to generate the AI analysis for this article.

Log In to Generate Analysis

Not a member yet? Register for free.

Unanalyzed Article Content

Shoppers using the online retailerAsoshave complained about having their accounts closed and being accused of breaching a “fair use” policy on returns.

Asos updated its terms and conditionslast September, introducing charges for shoppers who frequently returned large numbers of goods in attempts to crack down on “serial returners”.

In the past few days some customers have reported receiving emails saying their accounts would be deactivated.

One shopper, Tskenya-Sarah Frazer, said she had been contacted to say her account had been closed because she had made too many returns.

“As a tall, plus-sized, neurodivergent customer I find Asos’s decision to deactivate accounts without warning deeply concerning,” she said.

“For people like me, online shopping isn’t just a preference, it’s a necessity. The high street often doesn’t cater to our body types or sensory needs, and the physical act of shopping can be overwhelming … We rely on online retailers to try clothes in the safety and comfort of our own homes.”

Frazer, whose video sharing her experience has had 150,000 views on TikTok, said one of the reasons for the returns was inconsistent sizing.

“To now be penalised for returning items that don’t fit after being forced to order multiple sizes due to inconsistent sizing is not only unfair, it’s discriminatory,” she said. “There was no explanation, no transparency, and no chance to appeal.”

On X (formerly Twitter) another user posted a picture of two bodysuits which were both labelled as medium but appeared to be different sizes.

I’m a size 8-10. I mostly wear a size S. The bodysuit on the left is M (too small). The bodysuit on the right is also M (too big). But ASOS are closing my account because I return things 😂@ASOS_newspic.twitter.com/2CLGY2YtSJ

They said: “I’m a size eight to 10. I mostly wear a size small. The bodysuit on the left is a medium (too small). The body suit on the right is also medium (too big). But Asos are closing my account because I return things.”

Sign up toBusiness Today

Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning

after newsletter promotion

Asos said: “We recently closed the accounts of a small group of customers whose shopping activity has consistently fallen outside our fair use policy. This helps us maintain our commitment to offering free returns to all customers across all core markets.”

Gary Rycroft, a consumer lawyer at Joseph A Jones & Co solicitors, said it was lawful for a business to decide it did not wish to conduct business with a certain group of customers, as long as the decision was based on commercial data and not discriminatory.

“Asos have imposed a threshold on returns and that’s fine for them to change their terms and conditions and as long as other statutory protections for consumers are not breached,” he said.

Such a change in terms and conditions should not affect the right of consumers to return goods that are faulty or not as described, he added.Not matching a retailer’s published measurements for particular sizes could be said to be “not as described”.

Back to Home
Source: The Guardian